Menu

Close

OptoGranules reveal the evolution of stress granules to ALS-FTD pathology

Peipei Zhang, Baochang Fan, Peiguo Yang, Jamshid Temirov, James Messing, Hong Joo Kim, J. Paul Taylor

Preprint posted on June 18, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/18/348870

Optogenetic tool to identify and study how chronic stress causes the formation of pathogenic inclusions in neurodegenerative diseases.

Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

Context:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS – also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease), is a progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disease. Both ALS and a clinically overlapping condition, Fronto-Temporal Dementia (FTD) are characterized by insoluble cytoplasmic aggregates within affected neurons. The appearance of these inclusions precedes neuronal destruction, and they are typically highly enriched in a hyper-phosphorylated and ubiquitinated form of a 43KDa DNA-binding protein, TDP-43. In addition, these pathological inclusions also host a variety of RNA-binding proteins, as well as mRNA [1].

All of the proteins within these inclusions are also components of stress granules (SGs), cytoplasmic mRNP granules that form when cells experience a wide variety of stresses that also repress mRNA translation. In fact, translation repression has long been considered a pre-requisite for endogenous SG formation. The similarities between the composition of these transient, dynamic SGs, and the persistent, pathological cytoplasmic inclusions seen in ALS affected neurons have led many to hypothesize that the formation of these inclusions might relate to altered/perturbed stress granule dynamics [2]. As support for this hypothesis, mutations in a number of SG-related proteins are strongly correlated with the occurrence of ALS [3].

However, the hypothesis that SGs are required for the formation of pathological inclusions has never been robustly tested, and neither have any potential mechanistic connections between the two addressed. The challenges have largely been technical. Since most SG-associated proteins are RNA-binding proteins and all of them have other cellular functions, abrogating SG formation via genetic methods causes too many pleiotropic effects to provide a clean assay [4]. On the other hand, methods to artificially induce SGs rely on subjecting cells to external stressors, all of which introduce the confounding variable of translation repression (most often via the inhibitory phosphorylation of initiation faction eIF2⍺) [5]. In this preprint, Zhang et al. develop a novel optogenetic tool to induce SG formation rapidly and robustly without the confounding variable of translation repression, allowing them to define the role of SGs in the formation of pathogenic ALS-type cytoplasmic inclusions.

Tools and Key Findings:

Zhang et al. replace the dimerization domain of G3BP1 (a core protein of SGs) with the dimerization domain from cryptochrome 2 (CRY2 – a blue light-absorbing photosensor from Arabidopsis thaliana), thereby allowing rapid assembly of SGs in response to blue light. Importantly, these light-induced granules (named OptoGranules) contain polyadenylated mRNA as well as every canonical SG protein tested, indicating that they are, in fact, bona fide stress granules.

Zhang et al. Supplementary Video 2: Opto-G3BP1 forms granules
upon activation by blue light.

Critically, the formation of OptoGranules DOES NOT involve general translational repression via eIF2⍺ phosphorylation, thereby eliminating the major confounding variable involved in the study of the biological consequences of SG formation. In addition, OptoGranules form within seconds of induction by blue light, and disassemble within ~5 minutes once the light stimulus is withdrawn. The OptoGranules also provide evidence for a definite hierarchy within the SG proteome. While G3BP acts as a nucleator of granules, other canonical SG proteins, such as TIA1, FUS and even TDP-43, are unable to serve as initiators of SG assembly, and are likely client proteins.

With this tool in hand, the authors examine the consequences of chronic, intermittent SG formation. They use a blue-light treatment regime forcing cycles of OptoGranule assembly-disasembly, mimicking chronic stress cells might face within the context of an organism. The OptoGranules formed at the beginning of this regimen contain TDP-43, but not in the hyper-phosphorylated form seen in the pathological ALS inclusions, indicating that they are canonical SGs. However, when cells are subjected to this pattern of OptoGranule assembly and disassembly for extended periods of time, the TDP-43 incorporated within them becomes increasingly phosphorylated and ubiquitinated, and cell viability decreases, a characteristic of ALS inclusions.  While the authors’ initial results are performed in the context of a transformed cell line, they recapitulate their experiments in neurons derived from iPSCs expressing OptoGranule-compatible G3BP1, demonstrating in a neuronal context the evolution of SGs into pathogenic ALS-like inclusions.

Taken together, the authors demonstrate that the chronic assembly of SGs is detrimental to the cell, independently of the distal stressor. Further, they demonstrate convincingly that chronically and intermittently stressing cells (and more specifically, neurons) results in the SGs within them to morph into ALS-like pathological inclusions.

Why I chose this preprint:

The cellular response to any individual stress almost invariably involves the activation and/or repression of a multitude of pathways and mechanisms. Inferring a causal chain by deconvoluting the various pathways the cell uses to adapt and survive remains a challenge. In the case of ALS-FTD, a link between SGs and the pathological inclusions had long been suspected, but never proven, due to the confounding variables described above. I found the approach taken by the authors to develop a tool to remove the confounding variable and allow the study of SGs in isolation to be an extraordinarily elegant experimental system. The power of this system was demonstrated in the establishment of a concrete link between SG dynamics and ALS pathology, viz. the evolution of SGs into phosphorylated/ubiquitinated TDP-43 containing pathological cytoplasmic inclusions under chronic stress.

Open questions and future directions:

The authors speculate that physiological amyloid-like states in SGs could serve as ‘seeds’ for the formation of TDP-43 pathological amyloids under chronic stress. One open question that remains is the context and mechanism of TDP-43 phosophorylation. Is TDP-43 phosphorylated during, or as a consequence of, SG incorporation and subsequent amyloid formation? Or does the phosphorylation occur extra-granularly, and promote amyloid formation?

Additionally, given that global translation is presumably not downregulated upon OptoGranule formation (as evidenced by the lack of eIF2⍺ phosphorylation, I would be curious to know whether the Optogranules recapitulate the translationally null state of endogenous SGs.

Broadly, the OptoGranule system offers a marvelous opportunity to further study modulators of SG assembly, dynamics and the biological roles played by this phase-separated cytoplasmic organelle. More specifically, the tool provides an assay to test the roles of various ALS-associated mutations on the formation of the pathological cytoplasmic inclusions. Understanding these mechanisms is critical to inform future efforts to slow or even reverse disease progression. 

References:

  1. Ling, S.C., M. Polymenidou, and D.W. Cleveland, Converging mechanisms in ALS and FTD: disrupted RNA and protein homeostasis. Neuron, 2013. 79(3): p. 416-38.
  2. Aulas, A. and C. Vande Velde, Alterations in stress granule dynamics driven by TDP-43 and FUS: a link to pathological inclusions in ALS? Front Cell Neurosci, 2015. 9: p. 423.
  3. Figley, M.D., et al., Profilin 1 associates with stress granules and ALS-linked mutations alter stress granule dynamics. J Neurosci, 2014. 34(24): p. 8083-97.
  4. Youn, J.Y., et al., High-Density Proximity Mapping Reveals the Subcellular Organization of mRNA-Associated Granules and Bodies. Mol Cell, 2018. 69(3): p. 517-532 e11.
  5. Buchan, J.R. and R. Parker, Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol Cell, 2009. 36(6): p. 932-41.

Tags: als, granules, optogenetics, stress

Posted on: 7th July 2018

Read preprint (1 votes)




  • Author's response

    J. Paul Taylor shared

    Thank you for highlighting this manuscript. In answer to your question, we observe the TDP-43 phosphorylation signal arising directly within the stress granules, but phosphorylation of TDP-43 outside granules would probably be below our level of detection. So presently we do not know where TDP-43 phosphorylation is taking place. With respect to amyloid formation, we suspect that TDP-43 (and related RNA-binding proteins) normally adopt labile, physiological amyloid-like conformations within mRNPs. We suspect that labile, physiological amyloids of TDP-43 are at risk of conversion to stable amyloids that not only disrupt the utilization of the immediately associated transcript, but also alter the material properties of associated membrane-less organelles leading to impairment of cell biology more broadly. Where this hypothetical conversion might occur is also unclear, but we suspect that long residence time in the condensed liquid state of membrane-less organelles (e.g. RNA granules) increases this risk.

    The induction of optogranules does not cause a broad, global impairment of translation based on puromycin incorporation, but it is possible that some transcripts that are enriched in stress granules may have selectively inhibited translation. Sorting that out will require more sophisticated approaches such as ribosome profiling or proteomics adapted to nascent translation (e.g. BONCAT). Yes, as a matter of fact, we do see puromycin incorporated into optogranules, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that translation is taking place in the granules. In fact, it’s probably more likely that complexes containing nascent translation products (e.g. defective ribosomal products or so-called “DRiPs”) are incorporated into stress granules.

    There are a great many open questions about mechanisms of stress granule assembly, dynamics and function; the relationship of stress granules to translation; and the relationship of stress granules to disease. We hope that OptoGranules will serve as a useful tool for sorting out the answers to some of these questions.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    Close