Menu

Close

Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position

Chloe Moreau, Paolo Caldarelli, Didier Rocancourt, Julian Roussel, Nicolas Denans, Olivier Pourquie, Jerome Gros

Preprint posted on June 20, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/20/351106

Positioning of the limb field was long suspected to be dependent on Hox activity. Moreau et al. show for the first time that in avian species limb field positioning is dependent on Hox collinear activation during early gastrulation.

Selected by Wouter Masselink

Background

The formation of paired appendages in general, and limbs specifically is a crucial adaptation, which provides mobility to animals. The correct positioning of the limbs along the AP axis is essential for a robust body plan and any deviation severely impedes the mobility of an animal. As such, while remarkable variation exists in the positioning of the limb across species, their position is highly robust within any given species. The positioning of limb outgrowth correlates with specific regions of the spine. The spine can generally be divided into 4 regions; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral. Across tetrapods forelimb outgrowth occurs at the level of the cervico-thoracic boundary, while hindlimb outgrowth occurs at the level of the lumbo-sacral boundary. It is well understood that AP identity is provided by the phenomenon of Hox collinearity and as such directly controls vertebral identity. Therefore, Hox collinearity was long suspected to instruct the positioning of limb fields ( for reviews see Tanaka 2013, Tanaka 2016, Tickle 2015) but was never formally shown. Now for the first time, Chloe Moreau and colleagues combine classical comparative anatomy with advanced over-expression studies to provide direct evidence that Hox code identities instruct limb field positioning.

 

Key findings

In their preprint Moreau and colleagues use classical chicken embryological studies to find that the position of the forelimb bud is already specified by the end of gastrulation. They took advantage of the tissue grafting amenability of the chicken and show that a forelimb region grafted in an inter-limb position (and vice versa) results in the limb bud appearing in an interlimb position. Specifically, HoxB4, HoxB7, and HoxB9 were identified to be sequentially expressed in the epiblast as the forelimb position is specified. The activation of HoxB4 and inhibition of HoxB9 was sufficient to induce a limb field in the inter-limb region. These data suggest that HoxB4 and HoxB9 act together to specify the position of the fore-limb in chicken embryos.

 

If this was indeed true, this should be conserved across species. While mammals show very little variability in the positioning of the fore limb, in birds there is significant variability. Chickens consistently form their limbs at the 15th vertebra, while zebra finches and ostriches do so at the 13th and 18th vertebra, respectively. Taking advantage of this fact, it was expected that Hoxb4 and Hoxb9 expression is shifted anteriorly in zebra finches and posteriorly in Ostriches. Indeed, Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundaries are shifted and this is consistent with the specification of the limb field.

 

In a final heroic effort, the authors attempted to shift the boundary of Hoxb4/Hoxb9 expression by modulation of retinoic acid (RA) activity. The RA metabolizing enzyme, Cyp26a1, is known to modulate Hox gene activities. Cyp26a1 has variable expression domains in chicken, zebra finch and ostrich consistent with their variable specification of the forelimb. Indeed, the authors found that modulating RA activity, by either supplying exogenous RA or an RA antagonist shifts the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary. Consistent with the observations made in ostrich and zebra finch embryos exogenous RA shifts the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary and the subsequent limb field posteriorly. Conversely, the inhibition of RA activity results in a posterior shift of the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary and the associated limb field.

 

Taken together the authors convincingly show that the activation of Hoxb4 and repression of Hoxb9 are sufficient to induce the formation of the forelimb field and are responsible for the variability observed across bird species.

 

What I like about this work

This work takes advantage of the natural variability seen in the limb positioning of avian species. The authors use this variability to validate a long-suspected mechanism. The work is done rigorously showing both necessity and sufficiency, through several independent lines of work. Like any good piece of research, it answers one question while opening up several more.

 

Outlook

While the authors convincingly show how the expression domains of Hoxb4 and Hoxb9 specify the Tbx5 positive limb field, and thus specifies the position of the future limb. It makes me wonder if the authors attempted more longitudinal studies to see whether a shifting limb field also changes further downstream processes such as skeleton formation and nerve innervation. Also, is this a general mechanism which applies across all species with paired appendages or is it restricted to avian species or tetrapods? Given that Hox collinearity is an ancient patterning mechanism also seen in insects and jawless vertebrates, I would suspect that appendages in general is likely dependent on similar mechanisms and should thus also apply to both bony and cartilaginous fish. As such it would be interesting to see if the findings reported here also apply to skates. Skates are members of the cartilaginous fish family and have dramatically enlarged pectoral fins. If a similar mechanism applies in specifying the pectoral fin field in skates, one would expect a relative expansion of the hoxb4 domain, while Hoxb9 should be shifted further posteriorly. This should result in a wider fin bud allowing for the subsequent expansion of the pectoral fin domain.

 

References

  1. Tanaka, M. (2013). Molecular and evolutionary basis of limb field specification and limb initiation. Dev. Growth Differ. 55, 149–163.
  2. Tanaka, M. (2016). Developmental Mechanism of Limb Field Specification along the Anterior–Posterior Axis during Vertebrate Evolution. J. Dev. Biol. 4, 18.
  3. Tickle, C. (2015). How the embryo makes a limb: determination, polarity and identity. J. Anat. 227, 418–430.

Tags: chicken, hox, limb, positional identity

Posted on: 27th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

    Kerstin Klinkert, Nicolas Levernier, Peter Gross, et al.

    AND

    Centrosome Aurora A gradient ensures a single PAR-2 polarity axis by regulating RhoGEF ECT-2 localization in C. elegans embryos

    Sachin Kotak, Sukriti Kapoor



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.



    Selected by Coert Margadant

    SOL1 and SOL2 Regulate Fate Transition and Cell Divisions in the Arabidopsis Stomatal Lineage

    Abigail R Simmons, Kelli A Davies, Wanpeng Wang, et al.



    Selected by Martin Balcerowicz

    Analysis of the role of Nidogen/entactin in basement membrane assembly and morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Jianli Dai, Beatriz Estrada, Sofie Jacobs, et al.



    Selected by Nargess Khalilgharibi

    Neural crest cells regulate optic cup morphogenesis by promoting extracellular matrix assembly

    Chase Dallas Bryan, Rebecca Lynne Pfeiffer, Bryan William Jones, et al.



    Selected by Ashrifia Adomako-Ankomah

    1

    Simultaneous production of diverse neuronal subtypes during early corticogenesis

    Elia Magrinelli, Robin Jan Wagener, Denis Jabaudon



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    1

    mRNA localisation in endothelial cells regulates blood vessel sprouting

    Guilherme Costa, Nawseen Tarannum, Shane Herbert



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control

    Mayuri Rege, Ji Hun Kim, Jacqueline Valeri, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis

    Cerys S Manning, Veronica Biga, James Boyd, et al.



    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    1

    Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo

    Lars-Eric Fielmich, Ruben Schmidt, Daniel J Dickinson, et al.



    Selected by Angika Basant

    1

    Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.

    Jonathan B Michaux, Francois B Robin, William M McFadden, et al.



    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    A transition from SoxB1 to SoxE transcription factors is essential for progression from pluripotent blastula cells to neural crest cells

    Elsy Buitrago-Delgado, Elizabeth Schock, Kara Nordin, et al.



    Selected by Amanda Haage

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    Dynamic control of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1β and Tnf-α by macrophages is necessary for functional spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish

    Themistoklis M. Tsarouchas, Daniel Wehner, Leonardo Cavone, et al.



    Selected by Shikha Nayar

    1

    Also in the evolutionary biology category:

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    Conserved phosphorylation hotspots in eukaryotic protein domain families

    Marta J Strumillo, Michaela Oplova, Cristina Vieitez, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Peculiar features of the plastids of the colourless alga Euglena longa and photosynthetic euglenophytes unveiled by transcriptome analyses

    Kristina Zahonova, Zoltan Fussy, Erik Bircak, et al.



    Selected by Ellis O'Neill

    1

    The Ly6/uPAR protein Bouncer is necessary and sufficient for species-specific fertilization

    Sarah Herberg, Krista R Gert, Alexander Schleiffer, et al.



    Selected by James Gagnon

    Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position

    Chloe Moreau, Paolo Caldarelli, Didier Rocancourt, et al.



    Selected by Wouter Masselink

    The genomic basis of colour pattern polymorphism in the harlequin ladybird

    Mathieu Gautier, Junichi Yamaguchi, Julien Foucaud, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs

    Ariane Ramaekers, Simon Weinberger, Annelies Claeys, et al.



    Selected by Mariana R.P. Alves

    A robust method for transfection in choanoflagellates illuminates their cell biology and the ancestry of animal septins

    David Booth, Heather Middleton, Nicole King



    Selected by Maya Emmons-Bell

    A SoxB gene acts as an anterior gap gene and regulates posterior segment addition in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum

    Christian L. B. Paese, Anna Schoenauer, Daniel J. Leite, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    1

    Germ layer specific regulation of cell polarity and adhesion gives insight into the evolution of mesoderm.

    Miguel Salinas-Saavedra, Amber Q. Rock, Mark Q. Martindale



    Selected by ClaireS & SophieM

    1

    Wnt/β-catenin regulates an ancient signaling network during zebrafish scale development

    Andrew J Aman, Alexis N Fulbright, David M Parichy



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    Bacteriophage cooperation suppresses CRISPR-Cas3 and Cas9 immunity

    Adair L Borges, Jenny Y Zhang, MaryClare Rollins, et al.

    AND

    Anti-CRISPR phages cooperate to overcome CRISPR-Cas immunity

    Mariann Landsberger, Sylvain Gandon, Sean Meaden, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Dynamic Kinetochore Size Regulation Promotes Microtubule Capture And Chromosome Biorientation In Mitosis

    Carlos Sacristan, Misbha Ahmad, Jenny Keller, et al.

    AND

    Self-assembly of the RZZ complex into filaments drives kinetochore expansion in the absence of microtubule attachment

    Cláudia Pereira, Rita M Reis, José B Gama, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Individual- and population-level drivers of consistent foraging success across environments

    Lysanne Snijders, Ralf HJM Kurvers, Stefan Krause, et al.



    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    The ancestral animal genetic toolkit revealed by diverse choanoflagellate transcriptomes

    Daniel Richter, Parinaz Fozouni, Michael Eisen, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Genome-wide selection scans integrated with association mapping reveal mechanisms of physiological adaptation across a salinity gradient in killifish

    Reid S. Brennan, Timothy M. Healy, Heather J. Bryant, et al.



    Selected by Andy Turko
    Close