Menu

Close

Transient intracellular acidification regulates the core transcriptional heat shock response

Catherine G Triandafillou, Christopher D Katanski, Aaron R Dinner, D. Allan Drummond

Preprint posted on September 12, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/09/12/414706

A short-lived decrease in the pH of the cellular interior is critical to mount a response to environmental stresses such as increased temperature.

Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

Context:

In 1987, over three decades ago, a group led by Dr. Ludger Rensing at the University of Bremen leveraged pH-dependent chemical shifts in intra-cellular inorganic phosphate using [31P] NMR spectra and discovered that the cytoplasm of budding yeast cells acidifies when the yeast are exposed to a variety of stresses [1]. They also noted that this drop in intracellular pH is correlated with increased expression of heat shock proteins but were unable to identify any causal relationships between the two [1]. In subsequent studies, this stress-induced intracellular acidification has been shown to be a common feature amongst most eukaryotes [2, 3]. However, opinions have fluctuated between whether this phenomenon is a cytotoxic consequence of stress-induced damage, or a cytoprotective aspect of the cellular stress response [4].

In this preprint, the authors develop and utilize a system that simultaneously manipulates and monitors intracellular pH in budding yeast and can uncouple it from the heat shock stress response. This system reveals that a transient acidification of the cytoplasm upon stress – and subsequent restoration of the pH to physiological levels – functions as one input of an ‘AND’ gate (with the other input being the stress itself) to activate the transcriptional heat shock stress response. The data allow the authors to persuasively argue that intracellular acidification is an adaptive response to stress.

 

Key Findings:

The authors have developed a two-color system to monitor intracellular pH and the cellular response to stress simultaneously using flow cytometry. A pH-sensitive fluorescent protein reports on the intracellular pH, and a different non-overlapping fluorescent protein fused to a canonical heat shock response protein informs on the dynamics of the stress response. Though typically found in an acidic environment (~ pH 4.0), yeast maintain a slightly basic intracellular pH of ~7.5. Using their newly developed system, the authors show that when the yeast are subjected to short periods of elevated temperature, their pH drops rapidly to ~ 6.8.  When the temperature stress is relieved, normal intracellular pH is restored within a few minutes (Figure 1 – Figure 1A of the manuscript) and the reporter for the heat shock response rises to detectable levels (a delay that is likely due to the kinetics of protein maturation).

Figure 1: intracellular pH during heat shock and recovery

Next, the authors treat cells with nigericin, a chemical that blocks regulation of intracellular pH, therefore rendering it completely dependent on the media in which cells are grown. Cells subjected to a pH range of 5.0 – 7.5 during the heat stress (and recovery in normal media at ~ pH 4.0 after stress), show robust induction of the heat shock response (albeit at varied kinetics – dependent on the rate of post-stress recovery to resting pH). Remarkably, cells that were never allowed to acidify their cytosol (by growing them in media at pH 7.5 both during stress and recovery phases) never induce the heat shock protein. This indicates that:

  • Cytosolic acidification is critical for the induction of the heat shock response
  • Cytosolic acidification can be temporally decoupled from the heat shock itself, and still produce a response.
  • The stress response depends on the recovery from acidification to a resting pH.

Further, cells subjected to Nigericin treatment without heat shock don’t induce the heat shock protein regardless of the pH to which they are coerced, indicating that:

  • Cytosolic acidification is not sufficient for induction of the stress response.

Using RNA-sequencing, the authors discover that the cytosolic acidification is required for induction of the subset of stress-response genes whose transcription is dependent on Hsf1, a key transcription factor that regulates the yeast stress response, indicating that transient cytosolic acidification is required for Hsf1 activation.

 

Open questions, future directions, and why I chose this preprint:

            Hsf1 is an interesting protein. The canonical understanding is that when the cell is growing under conducive conditions, Hsf1 is sequestered by its binding to Hsp70. Under heat stress, Hsp70 is titrated away by exposed hydrophobic patches caused by heat-induced misfolding, releasing Hsf1 [5]. The primary question the manuscript raises is fairly obvious: “how does transient cellular acidification lead to Hsf1 activation?” The authors speculate on multiple hypotheses within the manuscript and favor a model wherein the Hsp70 substrate that titrates it away from Hsf1 is sub-toxic, stress-triggered protein aggregates that depend on cytosolic acidification. These aggregates would be comprised of “sensor” proteins, which would “demix” or separate from the cytosol in a biphasic manner, dependent on both temperature (the primary stressor) and the acidification of the cytosol. Previous work from the authors provides an example of how this might work. Poly(A)-binding protein, or Pab1, forms cytosolic aggregates in response to stress, in a fashion that is coordinately regulated by temperature and pH. The authors propose a model in which proteins like Pab1 synthesize and integrate multiple signals, such as the primary stress itself, and subsequent acidification – with the nucleation of Pab1 aggregates being dependent on thermal misfolding, and their subsequent growth into robust Hsp70 substrates being dependent on a drop in cytosolic pH – which is in fact exactly how Pab1 aggregates behave [6]. It is an elegant model, and satisfyingly explains the observations within the paper – but remains untested.

The proton transport mechanism for the intracellular acidification also remains undetermined, to the best of my knowledge. The author’s data indicates that the acidification is a consequence of proton influx from the growth medium, but the nature of the transporter remains unknown. The system the authors have developed provides a platform for both targeted and unbiased screens to identify the proton transporter, as well as potential sensor proteins (although functional redundancy of the latter category might complicate matters).

I was excited to read this paper as I felt it provided and interesting perspective on gene regulation under conditions of stress. The ubiquitous nature of temperature stress, both in terms of the breadth of organisms (and the cells that make up those organisms) that experience temperature stress, and the diversity of contexts under which the elevated temperature is experienced, raises the intriguing possibility that the cytoplasmic acidification provides an additional logic layer to correspondingly diversify the cellular response. For instance, elevated temperature in an acidic environment (permitting acidification) could elicit different gene regulatory responses than in a basic environment (restricting acidification). Furthermore, the original discovery by the Rensing group also reports similar drops in intracellular pH occurs in a response to a variety of different (but not all) stressors [1], begging the question whether other stress responses are also contextually interpreted based on environmental pH. The possibilities are endless, and endlessly intriguing.

 

References:

  1. Weitzel, G., U. Pilatus, and L. Rensing, The cytoplasmic pH, ATP content and total protein synthesis rate during heat-shock protein inducing treatments in yeast. Exp Cell Res, 1987. 170(1): p. 64-79.
  2. Bright, C.M. and D. Ellis, Intracellular pH changes induced by hypoxia and anoxia in isolated sheep heart Purkinje fibres. Exp Physiol, 1992. 77(1): p. 165-75.
  3. Zhong, M., S.J. Kim, and C. Wu, Sensitivity of Drosophila heat shock transcription factor to low pH. J Biol Chem, 1999. 274(5): p. 3135-40.
  4. Tombaugh, G.C. and R.M. Sapolsky, Evolving concepts about the role of acidosis in ischemic neuropathology. J Neurochem, 1993. 61(3): p. 793-803.
  5. Krakowiak, J., et al., Hsf1 and Hsp70 constitute a two-component feedback loop that regulates the yeast heat shock response. Elife, 2018. 7.
  6. Riback, J.A., et al., Stress-Triggered Phase Separation Is an Adaptive, Evolutionarily Tuned Response. Cell, 2017. 168(6): p. 1028-1040 e19.

Tags: heat, stress response, yeast

Posted on: 25th September 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Author's response

    Catherine G Triandafillou shared

    Thanks for featuring our work in this preLight. On a personal note, I’m really excited about this project because it gave me the opportunity to use quantitative methods to investigate a biological phenomenon that I was drawn to out of pure curiosity. We noticed that acidification accompanied many stresses in budding yeast and other organisms, and wondered if it might be a regulated part of the response. I remember when I first realized we were on to something. I had finally ironed out all the wrinkles in the assay and measured induction after stress at different pHs, and when I analyzed the data I was amazed to see a huge difference between the response of acidified and non-acidified cells. The only problem: I was doing this analysis after going home for winter break, so I had to wait three weeks before I could get back into lab to verify the result!

    A lot of exciting future questions come out of this study, many of which are touched on in this preLight. Of particular interest, of course, is now to determine the mechanism by which pH change regulates Hsf1 activation. The identity of the putative pH-sensitive sensor protein(s) remains to be determined, as do the mechanisms of cellular pH regulation during stress. Moreover, this study ties into ideas that have their genesis in earlier work from the Drummond lab: a shift from thinking of elevated temperature as creating catastrophic events in the cell, to an environmental signal which the cell senses and interprets as a cue to shift from one adaptive program to another.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    1

    Actomyosin-II facilitates long-range retrograde transport of large cargoes by controlling axonal radial contractility

    Tong Wang, Wei Li, Sally Martin, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer



    Selected by Romain F. Laine

    Stable knockout and complementation of receptor expression using in vitro cell line derived reticulocytes for dissection of host malaria invasion requirements

    Timothy J Satchwell, Katherine E Wright, Katy L Haydn-Smith, et al.



    Selected by Alyson Smith

    Maintenance of spatial gene expression by Polycomb-mediated repression after formation of a vertebrate body plan

    Julien Rougot, Naomi D Chrispijn, Marco Aben, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    1

    Activation of intracellular transport by relieving KIF1C autoinhibition

    Nida Siddiqui, Alice Bachmann, Alexander J Zwetsloot, et al.



    Selected by Ben Craske, Thibault Legal and Toni McHugh

    1

    A non-canonical arm of UPRER mediates longevity through ER remodeling and lipophagy.

    Joseph R Daniele, Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria, Vidhya Ramachandran, et al.



    Selected by Sandra Franco Iborra

    1

    Basal extrusion drives cell invasion and mechanical stripping of E-cadherin

    John Fadul, Gloria M Slattum, Nadja M Redd, et al.



    Selected by William Hill

    Ribosomal DNA and the rDNA-binding protein Indra mediate non-random sister chromatid segregation in Drosophila male germline stem cells

    George Watase, Yukiko Yamashita



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    An F-actin shell ruptures the nuclear envelope by sorting pore-dense and pore-free membranes in meiosis of starfish oocytes

    Natalia Wesolowska, Pedro Machado, Celina Geiss, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    1

    Multi-color single molecule imaging uncovers extensive heterogeneity in mRNA decoding

    Sanne Boersma, Deepak Khuperkar, Bram M.P. Verhagen, et al.



    Selected by Lorenzo Lafranchi

    Multi-color single molecule imaging uncovers extensive heterogeneity in mRNA decoding

    Sanne Boersma, Deepak Khuperkar, Bram M.P. Verhagen, et al.

    AND

    Live-cell single RNA imaging reveals bursts of translational frameshifting

    Kenneth R Lyon Jr, Luis U Aguilera, Tatsuya Morisaki, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    A non-canonical arm of UPRER mediates longevity through ER remodeling and lipophagy.

    Joseph R Daniele, Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria, Vidhya Ramachandran, et al.



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Microtubules Gate Tau Condensation to Spatially Regulate Microtubule Functions

    Ruensern Tan, Aileen J. Lam, Tracy Tan, et al.

    AND

    Kinetically distinct phases of tau on microtubules regulate kinesin motors and severing enzymes

    Valerie Siahaan, Jochen Krattenmacher, Amayra Hernandez-Vega, et al.



    Selected by Satish Bodakuntla

    2

    Also in the molecular biology category:

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Unlimited genetic switches for cell-type specific manipulation

    Jorge Garcia-Marques, Ching-Po Yang, Isabel Espinosa-Medina, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Almeida

    1

    Stable knockout and complementation of receptor expression using in vitro cell line derived reticulocytes for dissection of host malaria invasion requirements

    Timothy J Satchwell, Katherine E Wright, Katy L Haydn-Smith, et al.



    Selected by Alyson Smith

    The coordination of terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit is mediated through the regulation of chromatin accessibility

    Yiqin Ma, Daniel J McKay, Laura Buttitta



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Disrupting Transcriptional Feedback Yields an Escape-Resistant Antiviral

    Sonali Chaturvedi, Marie Wolf, Noam Vardi, et al.



    Selected by Pavithran Ravindran

    1

    Multi-color single molecule imaging uncovers extensive heterogeneity in mRNA decoding

    Sanne Boersma, Deepak Khuperkar, Bram M.P. Verhagen, et al.



    Selected by Lorenzo Lafranchi

    Multi-color single molecule imaging uncovers extensive heterogeneity in mRNA decoding

    Sanne Boersma, Deepak Khuperkar, Bram M.P. Verhagen, et al.

    AND

    Live-cell single RNA imaging reveals bursts of translational frameshifting

    Kenneth R Lyon Jr, Luis U Aguilera, Tatsuya Morisaki, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    A non-canonical arm of UPRER mediates longevity through ER remodeling and lipophagy.

    Joseph R Daniele, Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria, Vidhya Ramachandran, et al.



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Retrieving High-Resolution Information from Disordered 2D Crystals by Single Particle Cryo-EM

    Ricardo Righetto, Nikhil Biyani, Julia Kowal, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    The modular mechanism of chromocenter formation in Drosophila

    Madhav Jagannathan, Ryan Cummings, Yukiko M Yamashita



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    1

    The structural basis for release factor activation during translation termination revealed by time-resolved cryogenic electron microscopy

    Ziao Fu, Gabriele Indrisiunaite, Sandip Kaledhonkar, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    The cell wall regulates dynamics and size of plasma-membrane nanodomains in Arabidopsis.

    Joseph Franics McKenna, Daniel Rolfe, Stephen E D Webb, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    Psychiatric risk gene NT5C2 regulates protein translation in human neural progenitor cells

    Rodrigo R.R. Duarte, Nathaniel D. Bachtel, Marie-Caroline Cotel, et al.



    Selected by Joanna Cross

    DNA microscopy: Optics-free spatio-genetic imaging by a stand-alone chemical reaction

    Joshua A. Weinstein, Aviv Regev, Feng Zhang



    Selected by Theo Sanderson

    2

    Rapid embryonic cell cycles defer the establishment of heterochromatin by Eggless/SetDB1 in Drosophila

    Charles A Seller, Chun-Yi Cho, Patrick H O'Farrell



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey
    Close