Mitotic heritability of DNA methylation at intermediately methylated sites is imprecise
Samantha Seah et al.
CTCF is essential for proper mitotic spindle structure and anaphase segregation
Saanjbati Adhikari
Actin nucleators safeguard replication forks by limiting nascent strand degradation
Roberto Amadio
marmite defines a novel conserved neuropeptide family mediating nutritional homeostasis
Pablo Ranea Robles, Cláudia Gil
BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitinates PCNA in unperturbed conditions to promote replication fork stability and continuous DNA synthesis
Pierre Caron
Quantification of gallium cryo-FIB milling damage in biological lamella
Kanika Khanna
Coordinated growth of linked epithelia is mediated by the Hippo pathway
Girish Kale
Conserved Chamber-Specific Polyploidy Maintains Heart Function in Drosophila
Anastasia Moraiti
Unclearing Microscopy
Robert Mahen
Single-strand mismatch and damage patterns revealed by single-molecule DNA sequencing
Kerryn Elliott
Insm1 regulates the development of mTECs and immune tolerance
Marina Schernthanner, Jessica Chevallier
Peer Review in Biomedical Sciences
Communication of scientific knowledge has changed dramatically in recent decades and the public perception of scientific discoveries depends on the peer review process of articles published in scientific journals. Preprints are key vehicles for the dissemination of scientific discoveries, but they are still not properly recognized by the scientific community since peer review is very limited. On the other hand, peer review is very heterogeneous and a fundamental aspect to improve it is to train young scientists on how to think critically and how to evaluate scientific knowledge in a professional way. Thus, this course aims to: i) train students on how to perform peer review of scientific manuscripts in a professional manner; ii) develop students' critical thinking; iii) contribute to the appreciation of preprints as important vehicles for the dissemination of scientific knowledge without restrictions; iv) contribute to the development of students' curricula, as their opinions will be published and indexed on the preLights platform. The evaluations will be based on qualitative analyses of the oral presentations of preprints in the field of biomedical sciences deposited in the bioRxiv server, of the critical reports written by the students, as well as of the participation of the students during the preprints discussions.
List by | Marcus Oliveira et al. |