Motivation and food quality can affect the learning speeds and persistence of individual ants when foraging. This effect could drive the choice of specific food sources by a colony without the need for communication between ants or pheromone trails.James Foster
An important part of life as a social insect is working together to make the best decisions for the colony. Food sources in the surrounding environment may differ in quality, and new ones can appear at any moment. The colony’s reproductive output is affected by its ability to collect nutrients, so it must choose wisely between the available food sources. Bees and ants can communicate to one another about newly discovered food sources using various methods: honeybees famously “dance” information about direction and distance, and some ants lead or even carry their sisters to the desired location. In this manuscript the authors propose means for a colony to choose profitable food sources based purely on individual learning rates, with the tendency of individuals to return to a food source set by motivating factors and food source quality, which in turn would result in efficient foraging at the colony level.
The authors investigated how learning rates of individual black garden ants are affected by season, motivation and food source quality. They gave individual ants the opportunity to visit a pair of food sources in a choice chamber, one of which provided a sugar solution and the other of which provided only water. Most ants learned quickly to choose the sugar, although when motivation and sugar concentration were low many ants gave up visiting the choice chamber. Crucially, ants learnt faster in spring, when the colony needs nutrients most. Ants were less persistent in autumn, and even less so when the starvation period before the experiment was reduced from four days to one; an effect that was amplified by reducing the sugar concentration of the food source. These effects are presented alongside a simulation, suggesting that the learning rates of individual ants could lead to the nest as a whole choosing either to forage from many low quality food sources, or to identify and forage from only a few high quality ones, depending on their nutritional requirements.
How might even lower sucrose molarities affect learning and persistence rates? Are the ones used close to the threshold for what can be learnt?
Is it possible to manipulate the motivation of individual ants, perhaps physiologically? It would be interesting to know to what extent motivation is shared within the colony and how much it can vary between individuals (as the simulation suggests).
Posted on: 10th April 2018Read preprint
Also in the animal behavior and cognition category:
Bundling and segregation affects “liking”, but not “wanting”, in an insect
|Selected by||Lucy Nevard|
Multisite imaging of neural activity using a genetically encoded calcium sensor in the honey bee Apis mellifera
|Selected by||Lukas Weiss|
Can the Insect Path Integration Memory be a Bump Attractor?
|Selected by||T. W. Schwanitz|