Small differences in learning speed for different food qualities can drive efficient collective foraging in ant colonies

Felix B Oberhauser, Alexandra Koch, Tomer J Czaczkes

Preprint posted on March 01, 2018

Motivation and food quality can affect the learning speeds and persistence of individual ants when foraging. This effect could drive the choice of specific food sources by a colony without the need for communication between ants or pheromone trails.

Selected by James Foster

The Story

An important part of life as a social insect is working together to make the best decisions for the colony. Food sources in the surrounding environment may differ in quality, and new ones can appear at any moment. The colony’s reproductive output is affected by its ability to collect nutrients, so it must choose wisely between the available food sources. Bees and ants can communicate to one another about newly discovered food sources using various methods: honeybees famously “dance” information about direction and distance, and some ants lead or even carry their sisters to the desired location. In this manuscript the authors propose means for a colony to choose profitable food sources based purely on individual learning rates, with the tendency of individuals to return to a food source set by motivating factors and food source quality, which in turn would result in efficient foraging at the colony level.

The Study

The authors investigated how learning rates of individual black garden ants are affected by season, motivation and food source quality. They gave individual ants the opportunity to visit a pair of food sources in a choice chamber, one of which provided a sugar solution and the other of which provided only water. Most ants learned quickly to choose the sugar, although when motivation and sugar concentration were low many ants gave up visiting the choice chamber. Crucially, ants learnt faster in spring, when the colony needs nutrients most. Ants were less persistent in autumn, and even less so when the starvation period before the experiment was reduced from four days to one; an effect that was amplified by reducing the sugar concentration of the food source. These effects are presented alongside a simulation, suggesting that the learning rates of individual ants could lead to the nest as a whole choosing either to forage from many low quality food sources, or to identify and forage from only a few high quality ones, depending on their nutritional requirements.



How might even lower sucrose molarities affect learning and persistence rates? Are the ones used close to the threshold for what can be learnt?

Is it possible to manipulate the motivation of individual ants, perhaps physiologically? It would be interesting to know to what extent motivation is shared within the colony and how much it can vary between individuals (as the simulation suggests).


Posted on: 10th April 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the animal behavior and cognition category:

    Blue light induces neuronal-activity-regulated gene expression in the absence of optogenetic proteins

    Kelsey M. Tyssowski, Jesse M. Gray

    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    Establishment of the mayfly Cloeon dipterum as a new model system to investigate insect evolution

    Isabel Almudi, Carlos Martin-Blanco, Isabel Maria Garcia-Fernandez, et al.

    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira


    Regulation of modulatory cell activity across olfactory structures in Drosophila melanogaster

    Xiaonan Zhang, Kaylynn Coates, Andrew Dacks, et al.

    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das


    Elaborate pupils in skates may help camouflage the eye

    Sean Youn, Corey Okinaka, Lydia Mathger

    Selected by Carola Yovanovich

    Distributed correlates of visually-guided behavior across the mouse brain

    Nicholas Steinmetz, Peter Zatka-Haas, Matteo Carandini, et al.

    Selected by Craig Bertram

    Psychiatric risk gene NT5C2 regulates protein translation in human neural progenitor cells

    Rodrigo R.R. Duarte, Nathaniel D. Bachtel, Marie-Caroline Cotel, et al.

    Selected by Joanna Cross


    Predation risk and resource abundance mediate foraging behaviour and intraspecific resource partitioning among consumers in dominance hierarchies

    Sean Naman, Rui Ueda, Takuya Sato

    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    Antlions are sensitive to subnanometer amplitude vibrations carried by sand substrates

    Vanessa Martinez, Elise Nowbahari, David Sillam-Dussès, et al.

    Selected by James Foster

    Optogenetic manipulation of medullary neurons in the locust optic lobe

    Hongxia Wang, Richard B. Dewell, Markus U. Ehrengruber, et al.

    Selected by Ana Patricia Ramos

    Phenotypic landscape of schizophrenia-associated genes defines candidates and their shared functions

    Summer B. Thyme, Lindsey M. Pieper, Eric H. Li, et al.

    Selected by Daniel Grimes

    Using a robotic fish to investigate individual differences in social responsiveness in the guppy

    David Bierbach, Tim Landgraf, Pawel Romanczuk, et al.

    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    Molecular dynamics simulations disclose early stages of the photo-activation of cryptochrome 4

    Daniel R. Kattnig, Claus Nielsen, Ilia A. Solov'yov

    Selected by Miriam Liedvogel


    Individual- and population-level drivers of consistent foraging success across environments

    Lysanne Snijders, Ralf HJM Kurvers, Stefan Krause, et al.

    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    From Armament to Ornament: Performance Trade-Offs in the Sexual Weaponry of Neotropical Electric Fishes

    Kory M. Evans, Maxwell J. Bernt, Matthew A. Kolmann, et al.

    Selected by Cassandra Donatelli

    Controlled iris radiance in a diurnal fish looking at prey

    Nico K. Michiels, Victoria C. Seeburger, Nadine Kalb, et al.

    Selected by James Foster