T cell receptor is required for differentiation but not maintenance of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes

Angelina M. Bilate, Mariya London, Tiago B. R. Castro, Luka Mesin, Suppawat Kongthong, Audrey Harnagel, Gabriel D. Victora, Daniel Mucida

Preprint posted on 5 June 2020

Article now published in Immunity at

The clone factory - intraepithelial lymphocyte development requires TCR signaling and culminates in clonal expansion.

Selected by Pedro Papotto

Categories: immunology


The intestinal mucosa is home to a great number of immune cells; the vast majority being intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), a heterogenous population of cells that reside between intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), differing in their developmental pathways, but sharing a similar transcriptional program and phenotypic characteristics (such as the expression of CD8αα). One of such subsets is composed by the CD4+ IELs, derived from conventional CD4+ T cells (Tconv) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) that gain access to the gut epithelium. Similar to other lymphocytes, IELs bear a rearranged T cell receptor (TCR), which endow them with the capacity to respond in an antigen-specific manner. However, the role of TCR in IEL differentiation and function remains unknown.


Key Findings

The differentiation process of CD4+ IELs leads to clonal expansion

In order to understand if peripheral CD4+ T cells conversion into IELs involves specific TCR usage, Bilate and colleagues employed a transgenic mouse model in which inducible Cre recombinase expression permanently tags cells that at some point expressed Foxp3 (the master transcription factor for Tregs) and a constitutive Foxp3-reporter transgene allows the identification of cells expressing the transcription factor at the time of the analysis; coupling the dual reporter activity with cell surface CD8αα expression, the authors sorted Tconv, Tregs, and CD4+ IELs originated both from Tconv (cIELs) and Tregs (ex-Treg IELs) for subsequent single cell TCR sequencing. Analysis of clonal distribution showed a diverse TCR repertoire for Tconv and Tregs. Interestingly, the authors observed substantial clonal expansions for both cIELs and ex-Treg IELs. Furthermore, in addition to clone sharing between different intestinal compartments, a number of expanded clones were shared between cIELs and ex-Treg IELs, suggesting Tconv precursors arriving in the gut can end up having multiple fates.

By employing single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) coupled with TCR sequencing analysis, the authors then sought to address how TCR diversity correlates with the observed plasticity of the system. Trajectory analysis showed that three different pathways lead to generation of IELs, which in turn represent a final stage of differentiation, irrespective if from Tconv or Treg origin. Interestingly, clonal expansion increases as cells undergo differentiation towards IEL program, but only achieves its maximum dominance when cells become fully differentiated IELs.


TCR signalling is required for CD4+ IEL differentiation

The reported focusing of the clonal repertoire in the IEL population indicated that TCR signalling could be important during the differentiation process. In fact, the scRNAseq data also revealed that during their differentiation IELs loose the expression of several genes involved in TCR signalling, whilst acquiring genes from the IEL program (for a more detailed analysis, check the preprint by London and colleagues). In addition, by using a Nur77-reporter mouse model, the authors found that IELs and pre-IELS express decreased levels of Nur77 (a molecule downstream TCR activation) when compared to Tconv and Tregs. Thus, suggesting TCR signalling is important in the early steps of IEL differentiation. This hypothesis was confirmed by genetic ablation of TCR specifically in Foxp3-expressing Tregs and OX40-expressing cells (a molecule involved in TCR signalling and expressed in Tregs and activated Tconv); in both cases loss of TCR resulted in a decrease in IEL population. Moreover, by using a similar approach and specifically and temporally deleting MHC-II in IECs – and thus preventing TCR activation from the other side of the MHC-TCR interaction – the authors observed a specific decrease in IELs. Altogether, these results indicate that TCR activation in peripheral CD4+ T cells arriving in the intestinal mucosa contributes for their differentiation into IELs.


Maintenance of IEL transcriptional program is largely TCR-independent

The mouse models employed above allowed for the dissection of the TCR role in the differentiation of IELs; however, if the TCR also contributes to the maintenance of already differentiated IELs remained unknown. Hence, the authors employed a mouse model in which TCR ablation was conditioned by CD8a expression in mature T cells (and not thymocytes), thus enabling deletion of the TCR in CD4+ T cells only after acquisition of the IEL program. Surprisingly, TCR-deficient mice had similar frequencies of CD4+ IELs when compared to control animals. Additionally, TCR deletion did not impact on IEL functional characteristics (such as IFN-γ and granzime-B production), nor in the maintenance of the IEL transcriptional program. Of note reconstitution of lymphocyte-deficient mice with bone marrow cells from TCR-deleted and control animals showed that TCR loss resulted in less competitive disadvantages for CD4+ IELs than to other subsets of IELs. Overall, the data presented here strongly suggests that TCR signalling is dispensable for the homeostatic control of CD4+ IELs.



How specific TCRs contribute to the maintenance and differentiation of the peripheral pool of T cells, is still unclear. This question is particularly important in barrier tissues, where these cells are abundant and adopt tissue-imprinted programs that are key for the maintenance of homeostasis. In this preprint, Bilate and colleagues show for the first time that CD4+ T cells undergo a clonal focusing process in parallel to the acquisition of IEL transcriptional identity. Moreover, this study reveals a previously unappreciated role for TCR signalling in the differentiation, but not maintenance of CD4+ IELs.


Open Questions

  • It is surprising to see the expansion of few clones of mature IELs. Do these clones recognize a broad range of antigens? Are these expanded clones shared between mice? Can changes in microbiota or diet alter the clonal structure of CD4+ IELs?
  • As IELs have a reduced proliferation capacity, should we not expect the peak of clonal expansion in the pre-IEL populations?
  • This study focused on steady-state conditions. Is it TCR dispensable upon an inflammatory challenge?
  • Even though deletion of TCR in mature CD4+ IELs did not impact on their frequency under steady conditions, competition with TCR-sufficient cells suggest some disadvantage in not having TCR signalling. Taken together with the fact that MHCII ablation also results in a major decrease in IELs, could it not be that CD4+ IELs do need some sort of tonic TCR signalling for their tissue maintenance?

Tags: clonal expansion, intraepithelial lymphocytes, mucosal immunology, t cell receptor, tcr

Posted on: 20 July 2020


Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

Have your say

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here