Menu

Close

Immune factor of bacterial origin protects ticks against host microbial commensals

Beth M. Hayes, Atanas D. Radkov, Fauna Yarza, Sebastian Flores, Jungyun Kim, Ziyi Zhao, Katrina W Lexa, Liron Marnin, Jacob Biboy, Victoria Bowcut, Waldemar Vollmer, Joao HF Pedra, Seemay Chou

Preprint posted on April 11, 2020 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.10.036376v1

How Tick Spit got its Bite – Tick Immunity Using a Bacterially-Derived Protein

Selected by Connor Rosen

Background:

Horizontal gene transfer is a dominant mode of genome evolution in bacteria, but examples of cross-kingdom transfer of genes from bacteria into animals are rare. Previous work identified a family of anti-bacterial effectors likely transferred from bacteria to a common ancestor of ticks and mites hundreds of millions of years ago [Chou and Daugherty et al, 2014]. The adaptation of bacterial Type 6 secretion amidase effectors (TAEs) into domesticated amidase effectors (DAEs) suggested they may serve a beneficial effect in the new host organism. The tick Dae2 maintains anti-microbial activity, but its role in tick fitness remained unclear. In this preprint, Hayes and Radkov et al illuminate in more detail the biochemical activity of Dae2, and identify a role for its activity during tick bloodfeeding.

 

Key findings:

  • A horizontally-transferred amidase effector in ticks has expanded peptidoglycan specificity and direct antibacterial activity

Comparing Ixodes scapularis Dae2 to a bacterial homolog (Tae2 from Salmonella enterica) revealed that while Tae2 shows specificity towards Gram-negative cell wall peptidoglycan, Dae2 has an expanded substrate range and can degrade Gram-positive cell wall peptidoglycans as well. This corresponds to an increased anti-microbial activity, as Dae2 can directly kill several Gram-positive bacteria in culture, including multiple human skin commensal species.

  • Dae2 enhances tick fitness during feeding and infection

The authors found that Dae2 was upregulated during bloodfeeding and injected into the host in the tick saliva. This suggested it could target commensal skin microbes in the host, which might represent novel pathogens that could infect the tick during feeding. Blocking Dae2 with gene silencing or pre-bite passive immunization of the mouse host increased the colonization of Staphylococcus species in the ticks, as well as decreased the feeding efficiency of the tick. Additional experiments suggested that increased Staphylococcus colonization of ticks was pathogenic, leading to tick death when Dae2 activity was blocked. This activity is summarized in Figure 1, below.

 

Figure 1: The role of horizontally-acquired Dae2 during tick bloodfeeding.

During tick bloodfeeding, the Dae2 protein is injected into the host where it can target and kill host commensal skin microbes, such as Staphylococcus species. This enables robust feeding by the tick. In the absence of Dae2 activity (right), host commensal species can colonize the tick gut and decrease tick feeding and fitness. Figure prepared with Biorender.

 

 

Importance:

This study offers a compelling case study explaining a rare example of bacteria-animal horizontal gene transfer. The clear fitness benefit identified of Dae2 in ticks shows how acquisition of bacterial genes could be selected for over long evolutionary time and the potential of bacterial genes to expand the immune capabilities of animal hosts. Additionally, this study identifies a new biological pressure at the host-vector-microbe interface, where host commensals may act as vector pathogens – analogous to how vectors may harbor numerous host pathogens. Overall, this study expands both our understanding of how horizontal gene transfer may be used during animal evolution, as well as opens a new avenue to studying host-vector biology and the complex role of host microbes in shaping this interaction.

 

Moving Forward / Questions for Authors:

  • Dae2 is present in other tick species as well. It would be interesting to see how Dae2 antimicrobial activity has expanded or changed dependent on the host range of those ticks, and therefore the commensal microbes they are exposed to.
  • Ticks and other hematophagous vectors inject many proteins during bloodfeeding. Given that Dae2 has direct activity only against Gram-positive microbes, since it has no ability to cross the outer membrane of Gram-negatives, are there other effectors it might “cooperate” with to target more microbes? Do ticks have a broader range of anti-microbial salivary proteins than previously anticipated? The scope of tick (and vector) saliva targeting of host commensals, rather than the host directly, will be interesting to see, as the host-vector-microbe triangle expands.

 

References:

  • Chou S and Daugherty MD et al, “Transferred interbacterial antagonism genes augment eukaryotic innate immune function”, Nature (2014) 518:98-101

 

Posted on: 13th May 2020

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.20604

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here
    Close