Neuregulin-1 exerts molecular control over axolotl lung regeneration through ErbB family receptors

Tyler B Jensen, Peter Giunta, Natalie Grace Schulz, Yaa Kyeremateng, Hilary Wong, Adeleso Adesina, James R Monaghan

Preprint posted on 1 February 2018

All for one and one for all: Axolotl lungs regenerate through an NRG1-ErbB dependent compensatory response that involves cells throughout the lung and few rounds of division, rather than a highly-proliferative localized blastema

Selected by Alberto Rosello-Diez

Categories: molecular biology


While some human organs can undergo compensatory growth after amputation or damage, the process is extremely slow, and learning the fundamental aspects of this process in order to speed it up would have a strong impact on regenerative medicine. A priori, there are at least two conceivable mechanisms by which organs can recover their lost mass: 1) epimorphic regeneration, whereby some cells near the wound dedifferentiate and form a highly-proliferative blastema (e.g. regenerating limbs in amphibians and fins zebrafish); 2) compensatory growth of the organ as a whole, such that the mass is recovered but the original shape is not (e.g. liver in humans). Jensen and colleagues use the axolotl salamander to study lung regeneration, a process relatively unexplored outside mammalian models. Their molecular analysis focuses on the ErbB family of receptors and its activation of YAP signalling, both of which are important for pulmonary tissue proliferation. In particular, the ligand NRG1, the receptors ErbB2/4 and the YAP target HoxA1 are the usual suspects involved in the proliferative response [1-3].

Key findings

  1. Amputation of one third of one of the lungs leads to a rapid wound closure, with inflammation receding 7 days post amputation (dpa).
  2. There is a strong proliferative response as early as 7 dpa, but strikingly it is not restricted to the amputated region, but rather a whole-organ response, including the contralateral lung (Fig. 1A, B).
  3. While lung length is not overly recovered, lung volume is, and therefore the overall shape of the lung is altered. After 8 weeks, the amputated lung catches up to the control one in volume.
  4. Proliferative cells undergo only a few rounds of cell division, and tracking those cells suggests they give rise only to cells of their own cell type. If confirmed by marker expression studies, this would indicate that, as in rodent lungs [4], there is no a restricted population of multipotent stem cells that carries out the whole regenerative response. This is distinct from limb regeneration in the axolotl, which despite being quite lineage-restricted [5], works through the formation of a highly proliferative blastema where progenitor cells accumulate and proliferate actively.
  5. NRG1, ErbB4 and HoxA1 are upregulated in the injured lungs, suggesting they are responsible for the proliferative response. In fact, systemic inhibition of ErbB2 (which binds NRG1 and heterodimerizes with ErbB4) abolishes the proliferative response in injured lungs (Fig. 1C). Moreover, injection of NRG1 in uninjured lungs activates proliferation and a similar molecular response as seen upon amputation, and these responses depend on ErbB2 signalling.

What I like about this preprint

The study of Jensen and colleagues (understandably foundational as it is the senior thesis work of the first author) reveals that not all organs regenerate through the same mechanism in axolotl, and opens up a new set of questions to be explored in the future. It is surprising and refreshing that new basic discoveries are still possible in such an long-established model.

Pending questions

  1. Despite proliferation being activated in both the injured and contralateral lung, the injured one eventually catches up to the intact one in volume. Is this due to mechanical factors, such as there being more space available for the resected lung? And what happens to the extra cells in the uninjured lung?
  2. The authors suggest that inflammation plays a role to maintain the proliferative cells undifferentiated through repression of EGFR (ErbB1). Have the authors considered using antagonists of IL1B signalling after amputation, or agonists in combination with NRG1 treatment?
  3. The fact that NRG1 is able to induce proliferation of lung cells in the absence of amputation suggests that mass reduction is not required for the compensatory response to happen. If this is the case, I wonder how do lung cells ‘know’ when they have to stop proliferating –in other words, how do they know when the lung has been repaired?

 Related research

  1. Liu et al. 2009. Exp. Lung Res.
  2. Haskins et al. 2014. Sci. Signal.
  3. Liu et al. 2015. Mol. Cell. Biol.
  4. Kotton et al. 2014. Nature Medicine.
  5. Kragl et al. 2009. Nature.


Posted on: 23 April 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

Have your say

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here

preLists in the molecular biology category:

9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination

This preList contains preprints discussed during the 9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination. This conference was held in Kona, Hawaii from April 17th to 21st 2023.


List by Martin Estermann

Alumni picks – preLights 5th Birthday

This preList contains preprints that were picked and highlighted by preLights Alumni - an initiative that was set up to mark preLights 5th birthday. More entries will follow throughout February and March 2023.


List by Sergio Menchero et al.

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

This preLists features preprints that were discussed and presented during the CellBio 2022 meeting in Washington, DC in December 2022.


List by Nadja Hümpfer et al.

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

A list of preprints mentioned at the #EESmorphoG virtual meeting in 2021.


List by Alex Eve

FENS 2020

A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020


List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome


List by Hiral Shah

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)


List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

Lung Disease and Regeneration

This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.


List by Rob Hynds


This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.


List by Sandra Franco Iborra