Accelerated erythrocyte senescence causes dose-limiting anemia of antimalarial enolase inhibitors

Background of preprint

Malaria, an infectious disease caused by Plasmodium parasites, takes a massive toll on morbidity and mortality. While a positive selective pressure on hosts with certain hereditary blood disorders has been observed in certain malaria-endemic regions, efforts are still ongoing to understand the underlying mechanisms.

To circumvent problems associated with current inhibitors, such as the lack of specificity in target inhibition, Jezewski et al. target enolase to achieve cellular specificity of glycolytic inhibition. Enolase, an enzyme that catalyses the eighth step in glycolysis, exists as three isoforms in humans—ENO1(in all cell types), ENO2 (in neurons and erythrocytes), and ENO3 (in muscles)—which the authors utilised (Fig. 1). First, the authors characterised the physiologic effects of glycolytic inhibition in erythrocytes, and then they measured the impact of acute and specific glycolytic inhibition of erythrocytes on Plasmodium infection.

Figure 1. A summary of glycolytic inhibition effects in the preprint by Jezewski et al.

Key findings of preprint

(A) Metabolic profile of disrupted glycolysis in erythrocytes

First, Jezewski et al. used metabolomics to validate two lipophilic ester prodrugs, POM-SF and POM-HEX, establishing that treatment of erythrocytes with these two agents led to distinct metabolic profiles from untreated controls. These studies implicated enolase as the key mediator in the glycolytic inhibition. The generated profiles arising from glycolytic inhibition largely fell into two clusters: the prevention of metabolite accumulation, and the acceleration of metabolite depletion.

Specifically, the authors found that acute glycolytic inhibition increased glutathione and pyruvate metabolism. Since glutathione and pyruvate are antioxidants, glycolytic inhibition limited cells’ reductive capacity and increased their susceptibility to oxidative stress. Indeed, the authors confirmed a dose-dependent loss of reductive capacity using ¹³C-labelled experiments, and further showed that the increased susceptibility to oxidative stress led to accelerated senescence in erythrocytes.

From these experiments, Jezewski et al. concluded that glycolysis is essential to erythrocyte homeostasis.

(B) Impact of antiglycolytic inhibition in Plasmodium infection

Because Plasmodium induces oxidative stress in infected erythrocytes [1-3], the authors hypothesised that inhibiting erythrocyte reductive capacity could result in protection against malaria. To verify this hypothesis, the authors directly tested the antiparasitic activity of erythrocyte glycolysis inhibitors. Significantly, the antimalarial potency of these compounds correlated well with their ability to disrupt erythrocyte redox balance in vitro (and slightly less strongly in vivo in mice), leading the authors to conclude that erythrocyte enolase is likely the common target that links these two characteristics.

Next, Jezewski et al. verified that POM-SF and POM-HEX are effective against multidrug-resistant P. falciparum, and that further selectivity could be achieved with chemical complementation with pyruvate. The authors also found that enolase inhibition using selective inhibitors could reduce parasite burden and improve clinical scores and survival in murine cerebral malaria models.

Finally, the authors also investigated the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of enolase inhibitor HEX in non-human primates. Their experiments demonstrated that serum concentrations remained above the in vitro EC₅₀ against Plasmodium for at least 4 hours, leading them to conclude that these agents are likely to be clinically efficacious.

Why we highlighted this preprint

At the end of 2018, one of us (Zhang-He) wrote a preLight about the contributions of various drug discovery advances in the field of malaria. Indeed, the control of malaria has come a long way since then (though the ongoing covid-19 pandemic has unfortunately set progress back significantly [4]).

We selected this preprint to highlight the presentation of haemotoxicity in antimicrobial treatments. Many antimalarial treatments—such as primaquine and chloroquine—are often accompanied by haemotoxicities. In this preprint, the evidence presented by Jezewski et al. appears to suggest that such a trade-off indeed exists for antimalarials, particularly with therapy targeting host factors.

Despite these considerations, we believe that host factors in erythrocytes are promising drug targets for the reasons stated in the preprint: (a) erythrocytes serve as a vital host to the malaria life cycle and (b) variation in erythrocyte function in certain diseases confer a selective advantage to the host, suggesting multiple potential drug targets for malaria treatment.

Additionally, some selectivity may be possible. While oxidative stress is the very mechanism of action underlying both antimalarials’ efficacy and toxicity, the authors wrote that there may be some room for selectivity.

In this preprint, the authors posited that the human enolase is the main target of the inhibitors’ mechanism of action; but they also noted that they could not rule out other targets. That is probably what future work will build on—validating this target and building inhibitors to selectively target it over other isoforms. Further optimisation of the inhibitors’ pharmacokinetics will also be performed to improve their clinical utility.

The spooky season may be upon us, but the resistance to existing antimalarials remains a real and persistent threat. Against this ominous backdrop, we fervently hope that the discovery of these new druggable targets will give mankind a fillip in our constant battle against malaria.

Open questions

1. Were any markers of oxidative stress in vivo measured, and how well did these correlated with the inhibitor-induced anaemia in vivo?
2. Were there differences in the metabolic profiles of erythrocytes treated with POM-SF versus POM-HEX? For example, was one more efficacious in inhibiting glycolysis? Did this increase in efficacy affect the erythrocyte senescence or resistance to malaria infection?
3. What is the clinical impact of accelerated erythrocyte senescence on anaemia?
4. Given that neurons and erythrocytes both rely on enolase isoform ENO2 for glycolysis, was there a reason why murine cerebral malaria was chosen as the in vivo model?
5. Given that it is dose-dependent, is the negative impact of enolase inhibition transient? Specifically, do erythrocytes return to their normal rates of reaching senescence when the drug is washed out? This may be clinically significant, because patients who develop anaemia on the drug can be managed temporarily with blood transfusions for the course of the treatment.
6. From a clinical perspective, do you foresee any neurological side effects from inhibiting ENO2?

References

[1]        Cyrklaff M, Srismith S, Nyboer B, Burda K, Hoffmann A, Lasitschka F, Adjalley S, Bisseye C, Simpore J, Mueller A-K, Sanchez CP, Frischknecht F, Lanzer M, Oxidative insult can induce malaria-protective trait of sickle and fetal erythrocytes, Nature Communications 7(1) (2016) 13401.

[2]        Mohan K, Ganguly NK, Dubey ML, Mahajan RC, Oxidative damage of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium falciparum, Annals of Hematology 65(3) (1992) 131-134.

[3]        Becker K, Tilley L, Vennerstrom JL, Roberts D, Rogerson S, Ginsburg H, Oxidative stress in malaria parasite-infected erythrocytes: host-parasite interactions, Int J Parasitol 34(2) (2004) 163-189.

[4]        Sherrard-Smith E, Hogan AB, Hamlet A, Watson OJ, Whittaker C, Winskill P, Ali F, Mohammad AB, Uhomoibhi P, Maikore I, Ogbulafor N, Nikau J, Kont MD, Challenger JD, Verity R, Lambert B, Cairns M, Rao B, Baguelin M, Whittles LK, Lees JA, Bhatia S, Knock ES, Okell L, Slater HC, Ghani AC, Walker PGT, Okoko OO, Churcher TS, The potential public health consequences of COVID-19 on malaria in Africa, Nature Medicine 26(9) (2020) 1411-1416.

Acknowledgements

This preLight was co-written with Teng Hiang Heng, a PhD student at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and the University of Cambridge. She graduated from the National University of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and previously did her clinical rotations in the National University Health System.

Teng Hiang is also affiliated with the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) Singapore, where she did research attachments at the Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN). Her broad research interests include genomics, haematology, immunology, infectious diseases, cancer and paediatrics.

Tags: antimalarial, enolase, erythrocytes, glycolysis

Posted on: 31 October 2020 , updated on: 1 November 2020

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.25537

Read preprint (1 votes)