Menu

Close

Axon-like protrusions promote small cell lung cancer migration and metastasis

Dian Yang, Fangfei Qu, Hongchen Cai, Chen-Hua Chuang, Jing Shan Lim, Nadine Jahchan, Barbara M. Grüner, Christina Kong, Madeleine J. Oudin, Monte M. Winslow, Julien Sage

Preprint posted on August 06, 2019 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/726026v1

Article now published in eLife at http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50616

Neuron + cancer cell = deadly combination! Yang et al. find that cancers that exhibit a neuronal phenotype metastasize more.

Selected by Pavithran Ravindran

Categories: cancer biology

Background

Metastasis is the deadliest manifestation of cancer in which cancer cells are able to disseminate from the primary tumor and take up residence in a novel location within the body1–3. Such a process involves the intricate interplay of a number of molecular processes to allow the cancer cell to survive such a perilous journey4. Understanding this process is crucial to the development of molecular targets for cancer therapy. One poorly understood feature of, specifically, lung cancer is the expression of neuron-specific genes that seem to be upregulated in cancer cells that have metastasized. Does the manifestation of a neuronal-like phenotype aide cancer cells to metastasize? The authors in this preprint set out to investigate exactly this question.

 

Key Findings

To understand whether or not the expression of neuronal genes plays a role in metastasis, the authors decided to first determine whether or not lung cancer cells exhibit neuron-like phenotypes in culture and in vivo. When growing the cancer cells in a monolayer – by plating 3 lung cancer cell lines on Matrigel – and grafting them subcutaneously, the authors found that a subset of the cancer cells exhibited neuron-like protrusions (Figure 1). The authors then did a retrospective study and found a list of 70 candidate genes thought to be important in axon guidance, neuron growth and migration, and found that 69 of the 70 genes were present in small-cell lung cancer cells. The authors then stained these cells for axon/neuron specific genes and found that the protrusions exhibited many of these axon-specific genes. Finally, they confirmed that cells that had these protrusions were able to migrate faster than cells without them, very similar to the migration patterns of neuroblasts. Overall, these data suggest that cancer cells exhibit protrusions and these protrusions are very similar to axons growing off of neurons.

 

Figure 1 Cancer cells grown on Matrigel exhibit axon-like features. Figure from Figure 1A of preprint.

 

How are these protrusions affecting the metastatic potential of the cancer cells? The authors took the list of 70 genes and cut it down to a list of 13 genes that played non-overlapping roles in axon formation, guidance and neuronal migration. Upon analysis of the Cancer Dependency Map project, knockdown of these particular genes did not seem to have an effect on the growth of cancer cells in culture. However, when the authors used shRNAs to knock down these genes in N2N1G cells (mouse small-cell lung cancer cells that were derived from a lymph node metastasis), they found that these cells had fewer protrusions and migrated slower compared to wild-type cells. This further bolsters the idea that these protrusions are truly axon-like and the cells are behaving similarly to neuroblasts. Finally, the authors found that knockdown of two different genes that are important for the development of axons (Gap43 and Fez1) did not affect the growth of a primary tumor but significantly affected the metastatic potential of the cells, as mice implanted with tumors with shRNAs to these genes had much fewer metastases. Overall, this work suggests that protrusions that seem to grow in small-cell lung cancers are axon-like and play an important role in the metastatic potential of the cells.

 

Why I chose this preprint

Metastasis is a very diverse problem in which multiple programs are initiated in cancer cells with the end goal of colonizing a new organ. How this process takes place has been the focus of many papers in the past decade. What this paper does quite elegantly is find a phenotypic difference of cancer cells compared to normal cells and characterize how such a phenotype and its genetic drivers may actually contribute to this deadly process. This work is even more interesting in the context of recent papers published this month in which labs have shown that glioblastoma cells may acquire neuron like features and interface with normal neurons to grow5–7.

 

Questions for the authors

1. You hypothesize that the neuronal-like axons growing from tumor cells may help in the initial steps of metastasis. After engrafting a primary tumor, did you extract the blood from the mice and see if there are less cancer cells there after shRNA knockdowns?

2. Since these cells seem to be acting like neuroblasts, did you notice any correlation between the phenotype and brain metastases?

 

References

  1. Chen, Q. et al. Carcinoma – astrocyte gap junctions promote brain metastasis by cGAMP transfer. Nature (2016). doi:10.1038/nature18268
  2. Boire, A. et al. Complement Component 3 Adapts the Cerebrospinal Fluid for Leptomeningeal Metastasis Article Complement Component 3 Adapts the Cerebrospinal Fluid for Leptomeningeal Metastasis. Cell 1101–1113 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.025
  3. Zhang, X. H. F. et al. Selection of bone metastasis seeds by mesenchymal signals in the primary tumor stroma. Cell 154, 1060–1073 (2013).
  4. Lawson, D. A., Kessenbrock, K., Davis, R. T., Pervolarakis, N. & Werb, Z. Tumour heterogeneity and metastasis at single-cell resolution. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 1349–1360 (2018).
  5. Venkatesh, H. S. et al. Electrical and synaptic integration of glioma into neural circuits. Nature 573, 539–545 (2019).
  6. Zeng, Q. et al. Synaptic proximity enables NMDAR signalling to promote brain metastasis. Nature 573, 526–531 (2019).
  7. Venkataramani, V. et al. Glutamatergic synaptic input to glioma cells drives brain tumour progression. Nature 573, 532-538 (2019).

 

Posted on: 1st October 2019 , updated on: 2nd October 2019

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.14285

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here
    Close