Similarity metric learning on perturbational datasets improves functional identification of perturbations

Background

Similarity metric learning

Similarity metric learning is a technique to measure how similar or different things are from each other. Well known traditional similarity functions include the Pearson and Spearman correlation for omics modalities (Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2003) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for gene expression analysis (Subramanian et al., 2005).

Machine learning-based similarity metric learning works in a weakly supervised manner (Duffner et al., 2021). This means that the similarity metric learning doesn’t try to categorise things into classes making it suitable when labels are unknown or hard to obtain (Hernández-González et al. 2016). Instead, it integrates known similarities from repeated measurements to create a high-dimensional space (embedding) where similar things are grouped together. Thus, it learns how to determine if new, unseen examples belong to the same class or exhibit similarity.

In the context of biology, similarity metric learning has proven particularly valuable for analysing large biological datasets. Biological measurements, such as gene expression or cell morphology, are often complex, exhibiting multimodal characteristics, susceptibility to confounding factors, and cell-to-cell variability (Eling et al., 2019). This complexity makes interpretation challenging, especially with sparse single-cell data and low signal-to-noise ratios. However, employing a similarity function tailored to the specific dataset transforms the data into a meaningful context-specific representation, enabling us to identify patterns and relationships within the dataset. For instance, it may help us to identify the mechanism of action, which is the specific way a treatment or substance affects a biological system.

High-throughput perturbational datasets

Recent advances in cost-effective transcriptomics and image-based profiling technologies have made it possible to create extensive public datasets allowing researchers to study the effects of chemical or genetic perturbations on cells, in an automated high-throughput manner. Notably, the Next Generation L1000 Connectivity Map (Subramanian et al., 2017) and the JUMP Cell Painting project (Chandrasekaran et al., 2023), developed through collaborations between pharmaceutical companies and research institutes, contain cell profiles of cells exposed to more than 100,000 unique compounds and genetic manipulations. These collaborations provide a unique opportunity to explore genetic patterns and similarities to a) identify drug mechanisms of action, b) nominate therapeutics for a particular disease, and c) construct biological networks among perturbations and genes.

Key Findings

Overview

Smith and colleagues introduce PeML, a weakly supervised similarity metric learning method that transforms biological measurements into an intrinsic, dataset-specific basis. Thus, biological relationships and mechanisms can be extracted from noisy high-throughput perturbational datasets. To measure the performance of the new method, the authors use the L1000 dataset comprising gene expression signatures of compounds in cancer and immortalised cell lines, as well as the CDRP Cell Painting dataset containing cellular morphology and function data from a single cell line. The authors show that PeML maximises the discrimination of replicate signatures, improves recall in biological data and yields better prediction of compound mechanisms of action. Recall (also known as sensitivity or true positive rate) is calculated as the ratio of the true positive (TP) predictions to the total number of actual positive instances in the dataset. PeML is capable of being learned with moderate dataset sizes and goes beyond traditional approaches by capturing a more profound notion of similarity. Therefore, it might improve data classification, clustering, and subsequent analyses.

Fig. 1 Schematic of the weakly supervised ML similarity metric learning method Perturbational Metric Learning (PeML). Figure taken from Smith et al. (2023), BioRxiv published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence.

Perturbational Metric Learning (PeML)

PeML is a weakly supervised machine learning framework that learns a similarity function between samples. This method uses replicates of experiments as ground truth to train a data-driven similarity function. Unlike traditional methods, PeML is a feature transformation technique that works directly on processed genetic or physical characteristics data, eliminating the need to extract new features from the original raw data.

PeML improves replicate recall in biological data

First, the authors conducted a replicate recall analysis to quantify the model’s ability to capture biologically relevant relationships in the data. To account for differences between cell lines, separate context-specific models were trained for each cell line. The training was performed on small batches of data instead of the entire dataset at once (mini-batch stochastic gradient descent), making it more efficient. Signatures representing the same compound treatment were grouped together, regardless of dosage or time point. As a similarity metric balanced AUC was used, which adjusts for some classes having more examples than others. AUC is a metric for evaluating machine learning models in binary classification tasks. It measures the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, where TPR (correctly classified positive samples) is plotted against FPR (incorrectly classified negative samples), providing insight into the model’s ability to distinguish between classes.

Subsequently, the model’s generalizability and performance across different compounds was evaluated using 5-fold compound-wise cross-validations. This means that the dataset was split into five parts based on the compounds, and each part was used as a validation set once while the other four parts were used for training. Thus, the authors demonstrated that PeML outperformed the baseline cosine similarity, yielding higher replicate rank and improving recall for replicate pairs in various cell lines, as well as achieving better results for previously unseen compounds.

PeML improves prediction of compound mechanism of action from perturbational signatures

Next, the authors benchmarked PeML’s ability to identify drugs’ mechanisms of action. Across each cell line in the L1000 and Cell Painting datasets, they found that PeML recovers a greater proportion of biologically-relevant mechanisms of action. Furthermore, a signal-to-noise ratio analysis revealed that PeML better discriminates similar pairs from the background than standard similarity metrics.

Generalizability of PeML

While the previous analyses demonstrated promising results for large high-quality datasets, the performance on smaller training datasets remained unknown. Hence, the authors assessed the minimal training data required for a well-generalised model by downsampling the original datasets. Their results indicate that a few hundred conditions with replicates are sufficient to identify and retrieve biologically relevant associations from a given dataset.

Finally, the authors tested their initial hypothesis that context-specific models tailored to a specific cell line perform better than pan-models trained on all cell lines. The results demonstrated that learning context-specific models for different cancer cell lines improved similarity retrieval tasks compared to models trained in all contexts and cosine models.

Fig. 2 Cell line-specific metric learning functions outperform a pan-dataset function and a baseline cosine function in predicting Mechanism of Action. Figure taken from Smith et al. (2023), BioRxiv published under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Further Material

GitHub Repository

R package (not released yet)

Conclusion and Perspective

As the volume of large-scale biological datasets continues to grow, the increasing relevance of weakly supervised learning algorithms becomes evident, offering data-driven and scalable analysis while minimising the dependency on costly and time-consuming expert annotations and training data. In this preprint, Smith and colleagues present Perturbational Metric Learning (PeML), a powerful tool for the analysis of large biological datasets. PeML learns a data-driven similarity function by transforming biological measurements into an intrinsic, dataset-specific basis to extract meaningful biological associations such as compound mechanisms of action from noisy datasets. In addition to capturing a more meaningful notion of similarity, data in the transformed basis can be used for other analysis tasks, such as classification and clustering.

The idea of integrating large-scale imaging data into our pipelines has emerged as a pressing challenge. This led us to consider featuring a preprint that offers valuable insights into bridging multi-omics data analysis with imaging and machine learning. Given Benjamin’s expertise in integrating and analysing large-scale multi-omics data, along with Anna’s background in computer vision, bioimage analysis and machine learning, this preLight post presents an exciting opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration.

References

Chandrasekaran, S. N., Ackerman, J., Alix, E., Ando, D. M., Arevalo, J., Bennion, M., Boisseau, N., Borowa, A., Boyd, J. D., Brino, L., Byrne, P. J., Ceulemans, H., Ch’ng, C., Cimini, B. A., Clevert, D.-A., Deflaux, N., Doench, J. G., Dorval, T., Doyonnas, R., … & Carpenter, A. E. (2023). JUMP Cell Painting dataset: morphological impact of 136,000 chemical and genetic perturbations. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.534023

Eling, N., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2019). Challenges in measuring and understanding biological noise. Nature reviews. Genetics, 20(9), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0130-6

Hernández-González, J., Inza, I., & Lozano, J. A. (2016). Weak supervision and other non-standard classification problems: A taxonomy. Pattern Recognition Letters, 69, 49–55. https://doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2015.10.008

Stefan Duffner, Christophe Garcia, Khalid Idrissi, Atilla Baskurt. Similarity Metric Learning. Multi-faceted Deep Learning – Models and Data, 2021. ⟨hal-03465119⟩ https://hal.science/hal-03465119

Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., … & Mesirov, J. P. (2005). Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(43), 15545-15550. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102

Subramanian, A., Narayan, R., Corsello, S. M., Peck, D. D., Natoli, T. E., Lu, X., Gould, J., Davis, J. F., Tubelli, A. A., Asiedu, J. K., Lahr, D. L., Hirschman, J. E., Liu, Z., Donahue, M., Julian, B., Khan, M., Wadden, D., Smith, I. C., Lam, D., Liberzon, A., … & Golub, T. R. (2017). A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles. Cell, 171(6), 1437–1452.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049

Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E., Luedemann, A., Kopka, J., Selbig, J., Roessner-Tunali, U., Willmitzer, L. and Fernie, A.R. (2003), Parallel analysis of transcript and metabolic profiles: a new approach in systems biology. EMBO reports, 4: 989-993. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor944

Tags: cell painting, classification, clustering, correlations, data-driven, gsea, machine learning, next generation connectivity map (l1000), perturbations, similarity metric learning

Posted on: 17 August 2023

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.35232

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)