Menu

Close

Widespread inter-individual gene expression variability in Arabidopsis thaliana

Sandra Cortijo, Zeynep Aydin, Sebastian Ahnert, James Locke

Preprint posted on May 31, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/31/335380

What is the level of transcriptional noise among genetically identical individuals? In Arabidopsis, more than 1,300 genes are particularly noisy – a trait associated with gene length, transcription factor binding and the chromatin environment.

Selected by Martin Balcerowicz

The broader context: gene expression variability in multicellular organisms – a black box

Differences in gene expression are strong determinants for phenotypic variability and are themselves affected by both the genotype and the local environment of a given organism. But even genetically identical organisms that exist in a homogeneous environment can exhibit variations in gene expression, often referred to as noise in this context1, 2. Such inter-individual differences have mainly been studied in unicellular organisms and cell culture, and this research has particularly taken off with the advance of single cell RNA-seq. However, while phenotypic variability has been widely described in multicellular organisms, plants in particular, data on gene expression noise in these organisms is scarce. Existing studies mostly focus on differences between single cells or tissues within the organism, but global studies of inter-individual variability in gene expression are virtually non-existent. With their preprint, Cortijo et al. have begun filling this gap, studying variability in gene expression among individual Arabidopsis thaliana plants over a 24-h time course.

Key findings: A set of highly variable genes – and factors that may promote their variability

The authors employed RNA-seq to look at the transcriptomes of 14 individual seedlings per time point sampled every 2 hours during a full 24-h day/night cycle (Figure 1). They detected a wide-spread level of inter-individual variability in gene expression and identified more than 1,300 highly variable genes. Different subsets of these genes displayed different variability profiles, with the highest variability of two subsets being specifically observed at day and at night, respectively. This “noisy” set is enriched for genes involved in environmental and stress responses, whereas genes with low variability are mainly related to primary metabolism.

Having established a comprehensive data set of gene expression variability in Arabidopsis, the authors then looked at the factors that may determine the level of variability. Notably, a correlation between expression level and variability was observed for fewer than half of all highly variable genes, implying that additional factors are involved in determining whether a gene exhibits noisy expression. Indeed, several genetic and epigenetic features were correlated with high variability: (1) highly variable genes are significantly shorter than their lowly variable counterparts; (2) their promoters are bound by a higher number of transcription factors; and (3) their chromatin environment is characterised by the presence of repressive epigenetic marks, while lowly variable genes are generally associated with permissive epigenetic marks.

Figure 1: Experimental setup to identify transcriptional variability between seedlings during a 24-h day/night cycle. RNA-seq was performed on individual seedlings (12 time points, 14 seedlings each). Seedlings of different colours represent different transcriptional states, i.e. the inter-individual expression variability the study aimed to detect (reproduced from Cortijo et al., Fig. 1A).

 

What I like about this preprint                                                                                            

I particularly enjoyed that Cortijo et al. ventured into a field of research that is not heavily studied in plants or other multicellular organisms and thus largely lacks predefined concepts and methodology. While their approach itself is rather straightforward, the authors had to take many precautions to ensure their data are meaningful and not the result of either slight variations in experimental setup or technical noise in RNA preparation and sequencing. By doing so they have established ground rules for similar investigations and also provide a valuable resource future research can build upon.

In addition, I like that the authors made their data readily available via an easy-to-use web interface. So if you have a favourite Arabidopsis gene and would like to know about its variability, make sure to check out https://jlgroup.shinyapps.io/AraNoisy.

Future directions: The cause and consequence of noisy gene expression in plants

This article lays important groundwork for further studies on inter-individual variability in plants. Nevertheless, it is only a first step in increasing our understanding of this trait. In particular, there are two lines of research that I expect to be investigated in the near future:

  • A gene’s length, chromatin environment and the number of transcription factors binding it are factors associated with its level of expression variability. However, these observations are just correlations and a causal relationship has yet to be confirmed. How will future research tackle this question? Can we identify a particular genetic background that exhibits perturbations in one of these factors, or can we extrinsically alter any of these factors to study effects on noise?
  • As the authors themselves point out, it has been suggested for unicellular organisms that noisy gene expression is a survival strategy under unpredictable conditions; variability in the expression of stress genes for instance may increase the likelihood of some individuals to survive stress treatment. Intriguingly, many highly variable genes in Arabidopsis are involved in environmental and stress responses. Is there a way to show that noisy expression of these genes indeed benefits the survival of a plant population under certain circumstances?

References/Further reading

  1. Raj, A, and van Oudenaarden, A (2008). Stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135(2): 216–226.
  2. Raser, JM, and O’Shea, EK (2005). Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control. Science 309(5743): 2010–2013.

Tags: arabidopsis, gene expression, noise, transcription

Posted on: 15th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the genomics category:

    Comparative analysis of droplet-based ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA-seq systems

    Xiannian Zhang, Tianqi Li, Feng Liu, et al.



    Selected by Samantha Seah

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    LCM-seq reveals unique transcriptional adaption mechanisms of resistant neurons in spinal muscular atrophy

    Susanne Nichterwitz, Helena Storvall, Jik Nijssen, et al.

    AND

    Axon-seq decodes the motor axon transcriptome and its modulation in response to ALS

    Jik Nijssen, Julio Cesar Aguila Benitez, Rein Hoogstraaten, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control

    Mayuri Rege, Ji Hun Kim, Jacqueline Valeri, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    Precise tuning of gene expression output levels in mammalian cells

    Yale S. Michaels, Mike B Barnkob, Hector Barbosa, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs

    Chong Tang, Tian Yu, Yeming Xie, et al.



    Selected by Fabio Liberante

    The genomic basis of colour pattern polymorphism in the harlequin ladybird

    Mathieu Gautier, Junichi Yamaguchi, Julien Foucaud, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Single-cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes Driven by the Tumor Microenvironment

    Elham Azizi, Ambrose J. Carr, George Plitas, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    Cell type-specific interchromosomal interactions as a mechanism for transcriptional diversity

    Adan Horta, Kevin Monahan, Lisa Bashkirova, et al.



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    PDX Finder: A Portal for Patient-Derived tumor Xenograft Model Discovery

    Nathalie Conte, Jeremy Mason, Csaba Halmagyi, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    An atlas of silencer elements for the human and mouse genomes

    Naresh Doni Jayavelu, Ajay Jajodia, Arpit Mishra, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Capturing the onset of PRC2-mediated repressive domain formation

    Ozgur Oksuz, Varun Narendra, Chul-Hwan Lee, et al.



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    Heterochromatin drives organization of conventional and inverted nuclei

    Martin Falk, Yana Feodorova, Natasha Naumova, et al.



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    The ancestral animal genetic toolkit revealed by diverse choanoflagellate transcriptomes

    Daniel Richter, Parinaz Fozouni, Michael Eisen, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Genome-wide selection scans integrated with association mapping reveal mechanisms of physiological adaptation across a salinity gradient in killifish

    Reid S. Brennan, Timothy M. Healy, Heather J. Bryant, et al.



    Selected by Andy Turko

    Precise temporal regulation of alternative splicing during neural development

    Sebastien M Weyn-Vanhentenryck, Huijuan Feng, Dmytro Ustianenko, et al.



    Selected by James Gagnon

    Also in the molecular biology category:

    Signaling dynamics control cell fate in the early Drosophila embryo

    Heath E Johnson, Stanislav Y Shvartsman, Jared E Toettcher



    Selected by Yara E. Sánchez Corrales

    1

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Target-specific precision of CRISPR-mediated genome editing

    Anob M Chakrabarti, Tristan Henser-Brownhill, Josep Monserrat, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Transient intracellular acidification regulates the core transcriptional heat shock response

    Catherine G Triandafillou, Christopher D Katanski, Aaron R Dinner, et al.



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    1

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    1

    Site-specific K63 ubiquitinomics reveals post-initiation regulation of ribosomes under oxidative stress

    Songhee Back, Christine Vogel, Gustavo M Silva



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    1

    Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis

    Cerys S Manning, Veronica Biga, James Boyd, et al.



    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    1

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression.

    Jeroen van den Berg, Anna G. Manjon, Karoline Kielbassa, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs

    Chong Tang, Tian Yu, Yeming Xie, et al.



    Selected by Fabio Liberante

    Dynamics and interactions of ADP/ATP transporter AAC3 in DPC detergent are not functionally relevant

    Vilius Kurauskas, Audrey Hessel, François Dehez, et al.

    AND

    Major concerns with the integrity of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier in dodecyl-phosphocholine used for solution NMR studies

    Martin S. King, Paul G. Crichton, Jonathan J. Ruprecht, et al.



    Selected by Reid Alderson

    1

    Targeting light-gated chloride channels to neuronal somatodendritic domain reduces their excitatory effect in the axon

    Jessica Messier, Hongmei Chen, Zhao-Lin Cai, et al.

    AND

    High-efficiency optogenetic silencing with soma-targeted anion-conducting channelrhodopsins

    Mathias Mahn, Lihi Gibor, Katayun Cohen-Kashi Malina, et al.



    Selected by Mahesh Karnani

    2

    Glutamic acid is a carrier for hydrazine during the biosyntheses of fosfazinomycin and kinamycin

    Kwo-Kwang Abraham Wang, Tai L. Ng, Peng Wang, et al.



    Selected by Ellis O'Neill

    The Histone H3-H4 Tetramer is a Copper Reductase Enzyme

    Narsis Attar, Oscar A Campos, Maria Vogelauer, et al.



    Selected by Lauren Neves

    Super-Mendelian inheritance mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in the female mouse germline

    Hannah A. Grunwald, Valentino M. Gantz, Gunnar Poplawski, et al.



    Selected by Rebekah Tillotson

    1

    Close