Menu

Close

Defining the design requirements for an assistive powered hand exoskeleton

Quinn A Boser, Michael R Dawson, Jonathon S Schofield, Gwen Dziwenko, Jacqueline S Hebert

Preprint posted on December 10, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/12/10/492124

Power to the People; designing a hand exoskeleton from both a clinicians’ and patients’ perspective

Selected by Joanna Cross

Background

How many motions have you made with your hands in the last 5 minutes without realizing it?  Do you have to think about reaching for that mug of coffee or glass of wine?  Most of us are fortunate to have full motion in our hands but this is not the case for everyone.  Every year, 15 million people worldwide suffer from a stroke, which often leads to partial upper limb paralysis. In addition, spinal cord injury and multiple neurological disorders can cause reduced hand function.  Thankfully, technology has improved to allow creation of a “hand exoskeleton”, which aids movement of the hand and digits, but it is important to consider the needs of the patient when designing these exoskeletons. In this preprint, Boser et. al. describe interviews with both clinicians and patients who have restricted hand movement to determine how to optimize development of hand exoskeletons.

 

Key findings

The study recruited clinicians and patients, through the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital in Canada, to participate in interviews and hand motion characterization.   The interviews focused on what the participants considered critical in a hand exoskeleton design, starting with the activities they predicted the exoskeleton being most useful. The clinicians felt that one of the most important aspects was being able to get the thumb into opposition, an impression shared by one patient. However, the most common activities desired by the patients were day to day actions, including writing/typing, carrying objects and preparation/consumption of food and drink. However, both the clinicians and patients did not envision the device being put on and removed multiple times throughout the day.  This is an important point for development, as the device would need to be waterproof and slight enough to fit under outer clothing, such as a coat.   Nevertheless, the ability to be able to remove the device independently was critical for the patients.  Questions regarding the size of the device elicited a range of responses, possibly due to the size and age of the individual, but most agreed that the device could not exceed 5 x 5 x 3 cm and it could weigh between 200 – 500g. Interestingly, noise was not a restrictive factor, although the patients did note that one of the motors was too loud to be used in public.

Although the clinicians and patients agreed on most points, their opinions differed regarding the best method for controlling the device.  Electromyography (EMG) uses tiny electrodes to detect nerve signals which can then be translated in motion, but the clinicians were concerned that using EMG to control the exoskeleton could be difficult to learn and result in unwanted movements.  Therefore, they suggested that using EMG in association with a button mechanism could be a potential solution.  However, the patients did not like the idea of a button-control mechanism and one stated they would not use the device if that was the case.

In addition to interviews, the study also assessed the range of motion and grip force of the restricted hand in three of the patients.  This showed that each participant had different hand characteristics, which indicates that there will not be a ‘one size fits all’ exoskeleton.  Every device would need to be tailored to the needs of the individual in order to most completely aid the patient and to prevent injury.

 

What I like about this preprint

As scientists, I often find we tend to consider the immediate question that we want to answer and not the bigger picture.  Yet it is essential to value the input of the patient, who is, after all, the end user. This study emphasized the importance of this as, although the patients and clinicians agreed on most points, they differed in the best way to control the device.  In terms of the hand exoskeleton, a failure to comprehend the aversions of the patient could lead to dissatisfaction of the device and result in the device being unwearable.

 

Questions for the authors

Have you had contact with developers of hand exoskeletons to put your results into practice?

Are there any ethical considerations for designing exoskeletons, e.g. could they be used for non-medical purposes?

 

References

https://www.world-stroke.org/component/content/article/16-forpatients/84-facts-and-figures-about-stroke

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/test_procedures/neurological/electromyography_92,p07656

 

 

 

Posted on: 8th January 2019

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the bioengineering category:

    Imaging mechanical properties of sub-micron ECM in live zebrafish using Brillouin microscopy

    Carlo Bevilacqua, Héctor Sánchez Iranzo, Dmitry Richter, et al.



    Selected by Stephan Daetwyler

    1

    DNA microscopy: Optics-free spatio-genetic imaging by a stand-alone chemical reaction

    Joshua A. Weinstein, Aviv Regev, Feng Zhang



    Selected by Theo Sanderson

    2

    Polyacrylamide Bead Sensors for in vivo Quantification of Cell-Scale Stress in Zebrafish Development

    Nicole Traeber, Klemens Uhlmann, Salvatore Girardo, et al.



    Selected by Jacky G. Goetz

    SABER enables highly multiplexed and amplified detection of DNA and RNA in cells and tissues

    Jocelyn Y. Kishi, Brian J. Beliveau, Sylvain W. Lapan, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    Live-cell imaging of marked chromosome regions reveals dynamics of mitotic chromosome resolution and compaction

    John K Eykelenboom, Marek Gierlinski, Zuojun Yue, et al.

    AND

    Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

    Elisa Dultz, Roberta Mancini, Guido Polles, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens, Gautam Dey

    HIF1-alpha expressing cells induce a hypoxic-like response in neighbouring cancer cells

    Hannah Harrison, Henry J Pegg, Jamie Thompson, et al.



    Selected by Anh Hoang Le

    Zebrafish as a model to investigate the effects of exercise in cancer

    Alexandra Yin, Nathaniel R. Campbell, Lee W. Jones, et al.



    Selected by Jacky G. Goetz

    A 3D model of human skeletal muscle innervated with stem cell-derived motor neurons enables epsilon-subunit targeted myasthenic syndrome studies

    Mohsen Afshar Bakooshli, Ethan S Lippmann, Ben Mulcahy, et al.



    Selected by Chris Demers

    Observing the Cell in Its Native State: Imaging Subcellular Dynamics in Multicellular Organisms

    Tsung-li Liu, Srigokul Upadhyayula, Daniel E Milkie, et al.



    Selected by Arnaud Monnard, Gautam Dey

    Also in the neuroscience category:

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    1

    A schizophrenia risk gene, NRGN, bidirectionally modulates synaptic plasticity via regulating the neuronal phosphoproteome

    Hongik Hwang, Matthew J Szucs, Lei J Ding, et al.



    Selected by Laura McCormick

    Actomyosin-II facilitates long-range retrograde transport of large cargoes by controlling axonal radial contractility

    Tong Wang, Wei Li, Sally Martin, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Unlimited genetic switches for cell-type specific manipulation

    Jorge Garcia-Marques, Ching-Po Yang, Isabel Espinosa-Medina, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Almeida

    1

    Defining the design requirements for an assistive powered hand exoskeleton

    Quinn A Boser, Michael R Dawson, Jonathon S Schofield, et al.



    Selected by Joanna Cross

    Strong preference for autaptic self-connectivity of neocortical PV interneurons entrains them to γ-oscillations

    Charlotte Deleuze, Gary S Bhumbra, Antonio Pazienti, et al.



    Selected by Mahesh Karnani

    Proteomic Studies reveal Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 as a key regulator unifying neurodevelopment and synaptic function

    Adriana Ramos, Carmen Rodriguez-Seoane, Isaac Rosa, et al.



    Selected by Yasmin Lau

    Distributed correlates of visually-guided behavior across the mouse brain

    Nicholas Steinmetz, Peter Zatka-Haas, Matteo Carandini, et al.



    Selected by Craig Bertram

    Psychiatric risk gene NT5C2 regulates protein translation in human neural progenitor cells

    Rodrigo R.R. Duarte, Nathaniel D. Bachtel, Marie-Caroline Cotel, et al.



    Selected by Joanna Cross

    Single cell transcriptomics reveals spatial and temporal dynamics of gene expression in the developing mouse spinal cord

    Julien Delile, Teresa Rayon, Manuela Melchionda, et al.



    Selected by Reena Lasrado

    1

    Developmental heterogeneity of microglia and brain myeloid cells revealed by deep single-cell RNA sequencing

    Qingyun Li, Zuolin Cheng, Lu Zhou, et al.



    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    SABER enables highly multiplexed and amplified detection of DNA and RNA in cells and tissues

    Jocelyn Y. Kishi, Brian J. Beliveau, Sylvain W. Lapan, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    LCM-seq reveals unique transcriptional adaption mechanisms of resistant neurons in spinal muscular atrophy

    Susanne Nichterwitz, Helena Storvall, Jik Nijssen, et al.

    AND

    Axon-seq decodes the motor axon transcriptome and its modulation in response to ALS

    Jik Nijssen, Julio Cesar Aguila Benitez, Rein Hoogstraaten, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    Simultaneous production of diverse neuronal subtypes during early corticogenesis

    Elia Magrinelli, Robin Jan Wagener, Denis Jabaudon



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    1

    Local protein synthesis in axon terminals and dendritic spines differentiates plasticity contexts

    Anne-Sophie Hafner, Paul Donlin-Asp, Beulah Leitch, et al.



    Selected by Dipen Rajgor

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    Also in the physiology category:

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Defining the design requirements for an assistive powered hand exoskeleton

    Quinn A Boser, Michael R Dawson, Jonathon S Schofield, et al.



    Selected by Joanna Cross

    Reduced mitochondrial lipid oxidation leads to fat accumulation in myosteatosis

    Jonathan P Gumucio, Austin H Qasawa, Patrick J Ferrara, et al.



    Selected by Pablo Ranea Robles

    The Toll pathway inhibits tissue growth and regulates cell fitness in an infection-dependent manner

    Federico Germani, Daniel Hain, Denise Sternlicht, et al.



    Selected by Rohan Khadilkar

    Optogenetic manipulation of medullary neurons in the locust optic lobe

    Hongxia Wang, Richard B. Dewell, Markus U. Ehrengruber, et al.



    Selected by Ana Patricia Ramos

    Targeting light-gated chloride channels to neuronal somatodendritic domain reduces their excitatory effect in the axon

    Jessica Messier, Hongmei Chen, Zhao-Lin Cai, et al.

    AND

    High-efficiency optogenetic silencing with soma-targeted anion-conducting channelrhodopsins

    Mathias Mahn, Lihi Gibor, Katayun Cohen-Kashi Malina, et al.



    Selected by Mahesh Karnani

    2

    Rearing temperature and fatty acid supplementation jointly affect membrane fluidity and heat tolerance in Daphnia

    Dominik Martin-Creuzburg, Bret L. Coggins, Dieter Ebert, et al.



    Selected by Alexander Little

    Long-term live imaging of the Drosophila adult midgut reveals real-time dynamics of cell division, differentiation, and loss

    Judy Martin, Erin Nicole Sanders, Paola Moreno-Roman, et al.



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    Individual- and population-level drivers of consistent foraging success across environments

    Lysanne Snijders, Ralf HJM Kurvers, Stefan Krause, et al.



    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    Zebrafish as a model to investigate the effects of exercise in cancer

    Alexandra Yin, Nathaniel R. Campbell, Lee W. Jones, et al.



    Selected by Jacky G. Goetz

    Feedback control of neurogenesis by tissue packing

    Tom W. Hiscock, Joel B. Miesfeld, Kishore R. Mosaliganti, et al.



    Selected by Sarah Morson

    1

    Content-Aware Image Restoration: Pushing the Limits of Fluorescence Microscopy

    Martin Weigert, Uwe Schmidt, Tobias Boothe, et al.



    Selected by Uri Manor

    Galleria mellonella as an Insect Model for P. destructans, the Cause of White-Nose Syndrome in Bats

    Chapman N Beekman, Lauren Meckler, Eleanor Kim, et al.



    Selected by Heath MacMillan

    Genome-wide selection scans integrated with association mapping reveal mechanisms of physiological adaptation across a salinity gradient in killifish

    Reid S. Brennan, Timothy M. Healy, Heather J. Bryant, et al.



    Selected by Andy Turko

    From Armament to Ornament: Performance Trade-Offs in the Sexual Weaponry of Neotropical Electric Fishes

    Kory M. Evans, Maxwell J. Bernt, Matthew A. Kolmann, et al.



    Selected by Cassandra Donatelli
    Close