MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, Yan Coulombe, Yujia A Chan, Yi Dan Zhu, Louis-Alexandre Fournier, Philip Hieter, Jean-Yves Masson, Peter C Stirling

Preprint posted on November 17, 2018

A new role for the MRN complex - protecting our genome from R-loops via recruitment and activation of the Fanconi Anemia pathway

Selected by Katie Weiner


R-loops, transcription byproducts consisting of an RNA:DNA hybrid and the resulting single stranded DNA, have both gene regulatory function as well as pose a threat to genome stability. Cells have evolved several mechanisms to regulate R-loop formation, such as occlusion of newly transcribed RNA by RNA processing factors, degradation of RNA:DNA hybrids by RNaseH, or regulation of DNA accessibility by topoisomerase. In addition to these factors, it is becoming apparent that factors in the replication fork are also key R-loop regulators. This is especially important as R-loops are an endogenous source of transcription-replication conflicts. However, a complete understanding of all factors involved and their mechanistic roles is still lacking.

Key Findings

A key component of the double strand break repair pathway, MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN complex), is also required to process R-loops via recruitment and activation of the Fanconi Anemia pathway.

The authors begin by conducting a screen in yeast to determine factors that impair yeast growth when deleted in combination with both of the catalytic RNaseH enzymes (rnh1∆rnh201∆geneX∆). Among the ~100 hits, the authors find several previously characterized R-loop related proteins. They also find novel factors – including several components of the MRN complex. To characterize the role of MRN complex in R-loop formation, the authors rely on the S9.6 antibody that specifically recognizes RNA:DNA hybrids with subnanomolar affinity. By microscopy and ChIP-qPCR, they demonstrate that knock-down of RAD50 results in increased R-loop accumulation in yeast and mammalian cells. As a control, they validate that overexpression of RnaseH1 abolishes the increase in R-loop accumulation. Next, the authors show that in mammalian cells RAD50 knock-down induces replication stress in an RNH1-dependent manner; RAD50 knock-down activates the ATR DNA response pathway (measured by increase in Chk1 phosphorylation), increases transcription-replication conflicts (measured by decreased proximity between RNAPII-PCNA), and slows replication progression (measured by reduced tract length of IdU/CldU DNA comb labeling).

Additionally, the authors find that the new role of the MRN complex is not dependent on the nuclease activity of Mre11, as treatment with a Mre11 inhibitor or a catalytically inactive Mre11 mutant does not increase R-loop accumulation. Rather, the MRN complex works as a structural element to recruit other factors capable of resolving R-loops. They describe a role for MRN complex in the Fanconia Anemia pathway through epistasis analysis. They further confirm previous reports that MRN recruits the helicases FANCM and BLM. Lastly, they demonstrate that MRN promotes the ubiquination of PCNA by RAD18. RAD18 was a clear choice for further study as it was also a hit in their yeast screen and is an early step of the FA pathway.

Figure 1. Model of MRN function in R-loop tolerance and mitigation (Figure 7 of pre-print).


R-loops and their role in genome stability are beginning to be understood. This is especially important as genome stability is a hallmark of cancer and other human disorders. In this work, the authors show for the first time that the MRN complex, specifically RAD50, prevents R-loop accumulation in yeast and mammalian cells. The authors do a particularly good job of performing R-loop characterization and replication stress experiments with the additional control of RNH1 overexpression to confirm that any observed effects are R-loop dependent. They then demonstrate that the MRN complex prevents R-loop accumulation through its role in the FA pathway. While a link between MRN and the FA pathway was already known, the authors expand on our mechanistic understanding of how MRN regulates FA factor recruitment by modulating PCNA-ub through RAD18. It is encouraging to see a preprint not only identify a novel factor in R-loop biology, but to begin to link it into the larger context of what is known about R-loop regulation and human disease.

Future directions and questions for the authors

  • Do RAD50 and NBS1 have the same effect? Interestingly, only rad50 and xrs2, but not mre11 were identified in the authors original yeast screen, suggesting that MRE11 is not required for R-loop regulation. The authors further demonstrate that knock-down of MRE11 in a RNaseH2 deficient cell line does not impair viability, nor does a catalytically inactive mutant increase R-loop formation. However, the authors do not investigate if there are different requirements of the other components of the MRN complex RAD50 and NBS1. It will be interesting to see future work that starts to disentangle this complex further.
  • Is the decreased recruitment of helicases a direct effect of MRN depletion or a downstream consequence of decreased PCNA-ub? Interestingly, the authors show that MRN depletion affects an early step in the FA pathway. Is depletion of RAD18 epistatic to depletion of FANCD2 when combined with RAD50 depletion?
  • How does MRN promote PCNA-ub if RAD18 is already primed at R-loop forming loci? The authors note that RAD18 recruitment is not affected by depletion of the MRN complex, just its ubiquitination activity. Further, rad18∆ was an independent hit from their yeast screen. It would be interesting to delve deeper into the role of RAD18 for future studies.

Tags: dsb repair, mre11, r-loop, rad50, yeast

Posted on: 21st January 2019

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

  • Author's response

    Peter C Stirling and Emily Yun-Chia Chang shared

    Thanks so much for discussing our work in this post. You do a nice job summarizing the main findings of the work and raise several important questions, some of which we are addressing now.

    Regarding the potential for specific subunits of MRN to have different effects on this process, we agree that there is much to be learned here. We know from previous work that loss of any one subunit seems to inactivate the entire MRN complex. In our study, knocking down Rad50 or Mre11 significantly reduces the protein level of the other two MRN subunits. However, knocking down NBS1 has no effect on Rad50 or Mre11 protein level. It is possible that NBS1 may affect R-loop through other mechanisms independently of the MRN complex function. Indeed, NBS1 has been shown to activate ATR in response to stalled replication fork independently of Mre11 (Kobayashi et al., Genes to Cells, 2013). Furthermore, at UV damage lesions Nbs1 has also been shown to recruit Rad18 through a Rad6-like domain (Yanagihara et al., Mol Cell, 2011.  PMID: 21884979). It is possible that specifically disrupting this Nbs1-Rad18 interaction could influence FA pathway activation or recruitment at transcription-replication conflicts. Besides NBS1, it will be interesting to introduce other mutant alleles of Mre11 and Rad50 as well to see which specific domains, enzymatic activities or protein interactions are important for R-loop mitigation by MRN. For instance, we would like to test ATPase deficient mutants of Rad50 and mutants of the Rad50 coiled-coil domain which allow the SMC-like function of the MRN complex. For Mre11, it is still possible that mre11D was a false negative in our rnh1Drnh201D SGA screen, and we are testing this directly now.

    The decreased recruitment of helicases may be a direct effect of MRN, as we cannot ignore the crucial role of MRN in stabilizing the replication fork. However based on our data our current model is that the helicase recruitment defects are also due to a deficiency in PCNA-Ub formation by RAD18.  We find that RAD18 depletion has identical R-loop associated DNA damage phenotypes to RAD50 and is epistatic with both RAD50 and FANCD2, at least with respect to R-loop accumulation. We are now working to directly test this idea with a closer look at PCNA. We favour this PCNA-Ub model also because Rad18-mediated PCNA-Ubiquitination has been shown to recruit FANCL and promote FANCD2-Ubiquitination (Geng et al., J Cell Biol, 2010. PMID: 20937699 and other studies). The two helicases we tested, FANCM and BLM, functionally interact with each other and FANCD2 has been shown to regulate BLM stability on chromatin. FANCM can be recruited in a FANCD2 dependent and independent manner depending on the genomic context and the type of damage, so it is likely complicated. One approach we are considering is mapping FANCM recruitment genome-wide under different stresses/gene depletion conditions to try and tease this apart.

    How MRN promotes PCNA-Ub is indeed a key question for us. What we know is that deletion of Mre11 in yeast (Ball et al., PLoS ONE, 2011. PMID: 25343618), or in our hands depletion of RAD50 in human cells does lead to lower levels of PCNA-Ub. This is somewhat surprising because we know that loss of RAD50 leads to replication stress, reduced fork progression and DNA damage – all phenotypes we might associate with increased PCNA-Ub. Whether this takes place through direct interaction (e.g. that of Nbs1-Rad18 noted above), or indirectly is not clear. Moreover, whether this occurs in the same way in non-cancerous cells is open for investigation. One important potential linking factor is RECQ5, which in one study has been shown to stimulate PCNA-Ubiquitination by RAD18 without affecting RAD18 recruitment to sites of replication-transcription conflict (Urban et al., J Cell Biol. 2016. PMID: 27502483), and in other studies has been shown to interact with the MRN complex (Zheng et al., NAR, 2009. PMID: 19270065). So, maybe in some contexts MRN works with the RECQ5-RAD18 complex to stimulate PCNA-Ubiquitination. This speculative model raises other questions (e.g. what is happening in yeast, which lack RECQ5?) and is getting well beyond what we can cover in this paper.

    As you can appreciate there is a lot more to learn about regulatory events and the degree of specificity they might have for transcription-replication conflicts versus other types of replication fork stalling lesions.

    Thanks again for your interest in our work and questions. We think that the SGA screen data set and subsequent observations here open up some new doors for future inquiry.

    – Peter and Emily

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cancer biology category:

    Oncogenic hijacking of a developmental transcription factor evokes therapeutic vulnerability for ROS-induction in Ewing sarcoma

    Aruna Marchetto, Shunya Ohmura, Martin F. Orth, et al.

    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.

    Selected by Tim Fessenden


    Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype

    Nicole M Sodir, Roderik M Kortlever, Valentin JA Barthet, et al.

    Selected by William Hill

    Quantification of microenvironmental metabolites in murine cancer models reveals determinants of tumor nutrient availability

    Mark R Sullivan, Laura V Danai, Caroline A Lewis, et al.

    Selected by Maria Rafaeva


    Mechanical Stretch Kills Transformed Cancer Cells

    Ajay Tijore, Mingxi Yao, Yu-Hsiu Wang, et al.

    Selected by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.

    Selected by Mila Basic

    A conserved MFS orchestrates a subset of O-glycosylation to facilitate macrophage dissemination and tissue invasion

    Katarina Valoskova, Julia Biebl, Marko Roblek, et al.

    Selected by Giuliana Clemente


    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer

    Selected by Romain F. Laine

    Basal extrusion drives cell invasion and mechanical stripping of E-cadherin

    John Fadul, Gloria M Slattum, Nadja M Redd, et al.

    Selected by William Hill

    Molecularly distinct models of zebrafish Myc-induced B cell leukemia

    Chiara Borga, Clay Foster, Sowmya Iyer, et al.

    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon


    The landscape of antigen-specific T cells in human cancers

    Bo Li, Longchao Liu, Jian Zhang, et al.

    Selected by Rob Hynds


    Unjamming overcomes kinetic and proliferation arrest in terminally differentiated cells and promotes collective motility of carcinoma.

    Andrea Palamidessi, Chiara Malinverno, Emanuela FRITTOLI, et al.

    Selected by Tim Fessenden


    STAT3 promotes melanoma metastasis by CEBP-induced repression of the MITF pigmentation pathway

    Alexander Swoboda, Robert Soukup, Katharina Kinslechner, et al.

    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.

    Selected by Leighton Daigh


    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.

    Selected by Coert Margadant

    Profiling the surface proteome identifies actionable biology for TSC1 mutant cells beyond mTORC1 signaling

    Junnian Wei, Kevin K. Leung, Charles Truillet, et al.

    Selected by Rob Hynds


    Also in the genetics category:

    The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila

    Austin Q Seroka, Chris Q Doe

    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne


    Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development

    Christina Paliou, Philine Guckelberger, Robert Schöpflin, et al.

    Selected by Rafael Galupa


    Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity

    Myungin Baek, Vilas Menon, Thomas Jessell, et al.

    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation

    Jean Francois Darrigrand, Mariana Valente, Pauline Martinez, et al.

    Selected by Giulia Boezio

    Functional dissection of TADs reveals non-essential and instructive roles in regulating gene expression

    Alexandra Despang, Robert Schöpflin, Martin Franke, et al.

    Selected by Clarice Hong

    Crowdfunded whole-genome sequencing of the celebrity cat Lil BUB identifies causal mutations for her osteopetrosis and polydactyly

    Mike Bridavsky, Heiner Kuhl, Arthur Woodruf, et al.

    Selected by Jesus Victorino, Gabriel Aughey


    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.

    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    Kinesin-6 Klp9 plays motor-dependent and -independent roles in collaboration with Kinesin-5 Cut7 and the microtubule crosslinker Ase1 in fission yeast

    Masashi Yukawa, Masaki Okazaki, Yasuhiro Teratani, et al.

    Selected by I. Bouhlel

    Human Handedness: Genetics, Microtubules, Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Brain Language Areas

    Akira Wiberg, Gwenaelle Douaud, Michael Ng, et al.

    Selected by Jose Guerrero

    The Spatio-Temporal Control of Zygotic Genome Activation

    George Gentsch, Nick D. L. Owens, James C. Smith

    Selected by Meng Zhu

    Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development

    Cornelia Fritsch, F. Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Tim Humberg, et al.

    Selected by Gabriel Aughey


    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.

    Selected by Marc Somssich

    A direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila

    Christopher M Uyehara, Daniel J McKay

    Selected by Natalie Dye

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

    Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, et al.

    Selected by Katie Weiner


    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.

    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.


    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible

    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das


    Also in the molecular biology category:

    The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes

    Shintaro Maeda, Chinatsu Otomo, Takanori Otomo

    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    LTK is an ER-resident receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates secretion

    Federica G. Centonze, Veronika Reiterer, Karsten Nalbach, et al.

    Selected by Nicola Stevenson


    Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences

    Huanle Liu, Oguzhan Begik, Morghan C Lucas, et al.

    Selected by Christian Bates


    Blue light induces neuronal-activity-regulated gene expression in the absence of optogenetic proteins

    Kelsey M. Tyssowski, Jesse M. Gray

    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    Slide-seq: A Scalable Technology for Measuring Genome-Wide Expression at High Spatial Resolution

    Samuel G Rodriques, Robert R Stickels, Aleksandrina Goeva, et al.


    High-density spatial transcriptomics arrays for in situ tissue profiling

    Sanja Vickovic, Goekcen Eraslan, Johanna Klughammer, et al.

    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Optical determination of absolute membrane potential

    Julia R. Lazzari-Dean, Anneliese M.M. Gest, Evan Miller

    Selected by James Marchant

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.

    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high resolution cryo-EM

    Claudio Schmidli, Stefan Albiez, Luca Rima, et al.

    Selected by David Wright

    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.

    Selected by Robert Mahen


    Structures of the Otopetrin Proton Channels Otop1 and Otop3

    Kei Saotome, Bochuan Teng, Che Chun (Alex) Tsui, et al.

    Selected by David Wright

    Central spindle microtubules are strongly coupled to chromosomes during both anaphase A and anaphase B

    Che-Hang Yu, Stefanie Redemann, Hai-Yin Wu, et al.

    Selected by Federico Pelisch


    Cell growth dilutes the cell cycle inhibitor Rb to trigger cell division

    Evgeny Zatulovskiy, Daniel F. Berenson, Benjamin R. Topacio, et al.

    Selected by Zaki Ahmad


    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.

    Selected by Marc Somssich

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.

    Selected by Mila Basic

    Bacteriophage resistance alters antibiotic mediated intestinal expansion of enterococci

    Anushila Chatterjee, Cydney N Johnson, Phat Luong, et al.

    Selected by Yasmin Lau

    On-site ribosome remodeling by locally synthesized ribosomal proteins in axons

    Toshiaki Shigeoka, Max Koppers, Hovy Ho-Wai Wong, et al.

    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan