Site-specific K63 ubiquitinomics reveals post-initiation regulation of ribosomes under oxidative stress

Songhee Back, Christine Vogel, Gustavo M Silva

Preprint posted on 14 August 2018

Article now published in Journal Of Proteome Research at

Detailed analysis of an understudied modification of the ribosome highlights evidence for an elongation-based mechanism to halt protein synthesis during cellular stress.

Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan


Cells rely on the plasticity of their gene expression programs to respond, adapt to, and maximize their survival under a variety of stresses. While adaptation involves both transcriptional and post-transcriptional changes, translation regulation is particularly crucial in situations that demand a rapid response [1]. Stress such as hypoxia, starvation, viral infections, and heat shock lead to global translation downregulation [2], typically by phosphorylation of initiation factor eIF2a [3]. Initiation is thought to be the limiting step in mRNA translation, and therefore the principal control point during stress. However, there have been several lines of evidence that translation elongation is also limited under conditions of stress [4, 5]. Studying regulation of elongation is challenging, since almost all stresses that down-regulate elongation also inhibit initiation upstream [3], and deconvoluting the myriad cellular effects of a single stressor is not always feasible.

Oxidative stress induces rapid cellular accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins. Ubiquitin itself has seven lysine (K) residues, each of which can participate in further ubiquitination, generating poly-ubiquitin chains of different linkage types, which confer different fates upon the poly-ubiquitinated protein. K48 linkages are most common, and direct proteins for proteasomal degradation. K63 linkages, on the other hand, are the second most abundant, and have a variety of non-degradation associated cellular functions. While the authors have previously shown that K63 ubiquitination is important for cellular resistance to the oxidative stress, the mechanism by which this resistance was conferred remained unclear [6]. One reason was that available methods to globally identify sites of ubiquitination destroy information about the type of linkage.

In this preprint, the authors developed a new method called “Ub-DiGGer” to accurately and specifically identify sites of K63 ubiquitination proteome-wide in an unbiased manner. This method allowed to identify several sites of K63 ubiquitination upon the ribosome and characterize the role of this modification in the translational response to stress. The authors combined this high-resolution mapping with orthogonal studies that explored the effect of K63-ubiquitin on the ribosome – and found evidence for a new elongation-based regulatory mechanism.


Tools and Key Findings:

Using an unbiased method that combines selective affinity enrichment, differential isotope labelling and mass spectrometry, Back et al. identified ~1,100 sites of increased K63 ubiquitination in response to stress, mapping to ~500 yeast proteins. Their approach successfully identified a number of the previously confirmed sites of K63 ubiquitination, as well as many novel sites. In particular, the head of the 40S ribosomal subunit (which harbors the decoding center of the ribosome as well as flanks both the mRNA entry and exit sites) is enriched in sites modified by K63 ubiquitin linkages under oxidative stress, indicating a role for this linkage in translation regulation.

Structure of the ribosome with sites of K63 ubiquitination indicated in gold


Three observations within this preprint are particularly crucial to defining the role of K63 ubiquitination in translational regulation. Firstly, although translation initiation is inhibited under oxidative stress, abrogation of this inhibition is insufficient to restore the reduced translation output under oxidative stress back to normal levels. This result indicates that multiple stages of the translation cycle are repressed under stress. Secondly, abrogation of K63 ubiquitin conjugation in a mutant incapable of inhibiting initiation causes translation output to remain unaltered in response to stress, suggesting that K63 ubiquitination is involved in control of translation post-initiation, and likely targets the elongating ribosome. Finally, the authors show that K63 ubiquitination in response to stress occurs on fully assembled polysomes, further supporting that K63 ubiquitination affects translation post initiation.  Proteomic profiling of the ribosome indicates that the inability to form K63 ubiquitin linkages results in decreased association of elongation factors with the ribosome in response to stress, indicating an inhibited elongation cycle.

Taken together, the authors demonstrate that K63 ubiquitination is important for repression of translation elongation under oxidative stress, potentially by altering the recruitment of accessory translation factors to the ribosome.


Why I chose this preprint:

Primarily, this preprint pioneers a powerful new method to identify ubiquitin modified lysine residues as well as the type of ubiquitin linkage simultaneously proteome-wide in an unbiased and quantitative fashion. Given the diversity of ubiquitin linkages, this tool will be invaluable in understanding the biological roles of ubiquitination of various proteins in various contexts.

On a personal note, my own interests lie in gene regulation, particularly translation, under stress. Because most stresses result in robust repression of translation initiation, deconvolution of any mechanisms regulating the translation elongation cycle remains almost impossible (although observations suggest that such regulation does in fact exist). By leveraging a novel proteomic approach and the power of yeast genetics, the authors indicate (to the best of my knowledge) one of the very few bona fide post-initiation regulatory mechanisms of translation under stress, potentially via direct modification of the ribosome.


Open questions and future directions:

This question is perhaps obvious, but it is worthwhile to lay out. What is the mechanism? The authors have demonstrated an enrichment of K63 ubiquitination sites on the ribosome, as well a role for K63 in the regulation of translation. However, the direct link between the two has not been established. Which of the ~80 modification sites on the ribosome contribute to translation regulation under stress? Is the effect on translation an indirect downstream consequence of modification of a different protein? Although the latter seems unlikely to me, it has not been formally ruled out. Further, it is also possible that K63 ubiquitination affects both initiation and elongation in response to stress, and the former in a manner orthogonal to canonical eIF2a phosphorylation (which was tested by the authors). Of course, answering these questions is a non-trivial endeavor, and will likely involve systematic mutational analysis of the identified modification sites on the ribosome.

Additionally, a thorough analysis of ribosome occupancy on transcripts would perhaps be able to identify which step in the elongation cycle is affected by K63 ubiquitination, as would any potential structure of the “stressed” ribosome decorated with K63 ubiquitin.

Broadly, the techniques laid out in this article, as well as the datasets described, provide an exciting opportunity to further study the biological roles of this ubiquitous yet incompletely understood protein modification. Additionally, a dozen years after the first evidence for an elongation-based translation halt under stress [7], I am excited to see evidence for this novel mechanism.



  1. de Nadal, E., G. Ammerer, and F. Posas, Controlling gene expression in response to stress. Nat Rev Genet, 2011. 12(12): p. 833-45.
  2. Panas, M.D., P. Ivanov, and P. Anderson, Mechanistic insights into mammalian stress granule dynamics. J Cell Biol, 2016. 215(3): p. 313-323.
  3. Liu, B. and S.B. Qian, Translational reprogramming in cellular stress response. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA, 2014. 5(3): p. 301-15.
  4. Shalgi, R., et al., Widespread regulation of translation by elongation pausing in heat shock. Mol Cell, 2013. 49(3): p. 439-52.
  5. Liu, B., Y. Han, and S.B. Qian, Cotranslational response to proteotoxic stress by elongation pausing of ribosomes. Mol Cell, 2013. 49(3): p. 453-63.
  6. Silva, G.M., D. Finley, and C. Vogel, K63 polyubiquitination is a new modulator of the oxidative stress response. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2015. 22(2): p. 116-23.
  7. Shenton, D., et al., Global translational responses to oxidative stress impact upon multiple levels of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem, 2006. 281(39): p. 29011-21.

Tags: k63, translation, ubiquitin

Posted on: 28 August 2018


Read preprint (1 votes)

Author's response

Gustavo M Silva shared

We are excited to see our work highlighted here at PreLights as our manuscript presents a new proteomics method that allowed us to delve deeper into the regulation of translation in response to oxidative stress. Like you and other researchers in this field, we are also very interested in solving new molecular mechanisms underlying translation control. Although highly complex and challenging as you mentioned, it is fascinating for us to investigate novel pathways of post-translation regulation of such a fundamental biological process and to understand the distinct roles of sub-populations of ribosomes during the stress response.

Our approach has been to first dissect individual ubiquitin pathways apart from the global ubiquitin response to then start elucidating its functional roles. Here we provided a new mass spectrometry-based method for the analysis of the K63 ubiquitin modified proteome under stress that demonstrated how widespread this modification is and that ribosomes were among the most abundant targets.

By resolving individual ubiquitin linkage pathways (e.g. K63), we were able to identify a new pathway of translation control independent of GCN2, and thus, independent of translation initiation. We agree that more information is required to unequivocally establish the relationship between K63 ubiquitin and translation control but we provided an important stepping stone towards resolving this new molecular mechanism. To understand causation, it seems logical to conduct point mutation of individual lysine residues in the ribosomes as proposed. However, other authors have shown that site-direct mutagenesis of selected ubiquitin sites promoted only partial impairment of ribosomal function.

We are working under the hypothesis that there is a huge redundancy in this system and that mutations on a large number of sites might be required to completely inhibit ribosomal reprogramming under stress. Furthermore, many of our results support the notion that this is not an indirect effect: K63 ubiquitin modifies the head of the 40S ribosome (decoding center), lack of K63 ubiquitin impacts the interaction of ribosome with translation factors, K63 ubiquitin co-localizes and coats the surface of ribosomes where these translation factors bind, and K63 ubiquitin modifies fully assembled particles. Our data suggest that a significant structural change might be required to modulate the interaction of ribosome with these factors (instead of a single ubiquitin site).  Moreover, modification of individual subunits (40S and 60S) and changes in the abundance of both, initiation and elongation factors, suggested that K63 ubiquitin can act as a fail-safe mechanism to guarantee a highly specific control of protein synthesis in response to stress.

My lab is currently investing in a variety of large scale and molecular approaches to better understand how K63 ubiquitin modifies ribosome, alters its function, and supports cellular resistance to stress. Proteomics methodologies as the one presented here is not only relevant for the field of translation control but also reveals new regulatory functions for ubiquitin and generates an important database on ubiquitin diversity for the scientific community. This post highlighted many of the open questions that we are currently addressing in our research projects, which we hope to continue contributing to deciphering mechanisms of ubiquitin control of gene expression.

Have your say

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here

preLists in the biochemistry category:

20th “Genetics Workshops in Hungary”, Szeged (25th, September)

In this annual conference, Hungarian geneticists, biochemists and biotechnologists presented their works. Link:


List by Nándor Lipták


The advances in fibroblast biology preList explores the recent discoveries and preprints of the fibroblast world. Get ready to immerse yourself with this list created for fibroblasts aficionados and lovers, and beyond. Here, my goal is to include preprints of fibroblast biology, heterogeneity, fate, extracellular matrix, behavior, topography, single-cell atlases, spatial transcriptomics, and their matrix!


List by Osvaldo Contreras

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)


List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019


List by Dey Lab

Cellular metabolism

A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.


List by Pablo Ranea Robles


This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.


List by Sandra Franco Iborra