A Scube2-Shh feedback loop links morphogen release to morphogen signaling to enable scale invariant patterning of the ventral neural tube
Preprint posted on November 13, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/11/13/469239
How do morphogen gradients adapt to size differences? Within populations, individuals vary in size, yet their proportions are similar. This process is known as scale-invariant patterning, and it is a crucial process in development [1,2]. A well-characterized example of this mechanism is the patterning of the neural tube, where it has been shown that embryonic proportions are constant in mouse embryos of different sizes, as well as in embryos of different species. In this preprint, Collins et al. investigate the mechanism by which sonic hedgehog (Shh) morphogen gradient scales in the ventral neural tube in zebrafish embryos of different sizes.
To generate embryos of varying sizes, they surgically remove some cells in the blastula stage (prior to neuroectoderm formation); this rendered embryos of smaller sizes but with constant proportions. Quantifications of a Shh target demonstrate that the response is scaled following embryo reduction.
The authors focus their attention on Scube2, a lipid-binding protein required for Shh release non-cell-autonomously, which is expressed in the dorsal and intermediate neural tube. They demonstrate that Scube2 is a diffusible factor distributed throughout the embryo that is secreted from dorsal cells, and it is repressed by Shh signaling.
The authors next wanted to test whether Scube2 expression would scale like Shh reporter genes in sized-reduced embryos. When they measure Scube2 expression in size-reduced embryos, they find that the reduction in Scube2 levels is not scaled: the levels are 50% reduced at DV positions of maximal expression compared to controls, a pattern not found for al scaling invariant genes formerly tested. In addition, when Scube2 is overexpressed in size-reduced embryos, Shh target response is of the same amplitude in embryos of all sizes. This implicates that control of scube2 is responsible for adjusting the Shh signalling gradient in a decreased tissue.
Why I chose the paper:
Embryo development is strikingly robust, and it can cope with variations in size or morphological alterations , however the mechanisms that allow embryos to adapt are poorly understood. Collins et al. identify a size-dependent factor that allows the scaling of Shh morphogen gradient in embryos of reduced sizes, adjusting proportionally to the embryonic axis.
The first thing I liked about this work is the surgical method developed in The Megason group to change embryo size and look at size-dependent scaling. They generate perfectly viable and scaled embryos by removing a big percentage of cells at the blastula stage without the need of genetically altering the embryos, which then allows them to perturb different genes.
Their molecular characterization with fish mutants and transgenic reporters is reminiscent of an expander-repressor model . In this model, the morphogen inhibits the expression of an “expander” molecule (Scube2 ), which functions to increase the gradient, holding back morphogen levels at a specific position. What I like about this model is that it does not rely on morphogen diffusion or degradation – that are common molecular properties of proteins regardless of the embryo size – but it relies on the feedback between “expander” and “inhibitor” to continuously adjust the gradient globally. It will be good to see how an expander-repressor model adjusts to their findings and what new predictions we can infer from the model.
Almuedo-Castillo, M., Bläßle, A., Mörsdorf, D., Marcon, L., Soh, G. H., Rogers, K. W., … Müller, P. (2018). Scale-invariant patterning by size-dependent inhibition of Nodal signalling. Nature Cell Biology, 20(9), 1032–1042. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0155-7
Ben-Zvi, D., & Barkai, N. (2010). Scaling of morphogen gradients by an expansion-repression integral feedback control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(15), 6924–9. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912734107
Umulis, D. M., & Othmer, H. G. (2013). Mechanisms of scaling in pattern formation. Development (Cambridge, England), 140(24), 4830–43. http://doi.org/10.1242/dev.10051
Questions to the authors:
- The neural tube is highly similar in fish and mammals even though there are some differences in the formation of the neural tube. Do the authors think that the expander-repressor model through Scube2 will operate similarly in mammals?
- The size reduction of the embryos occurs early in development, before any Shh has been secreted. Do the authors think their identified mechanism can operate after injury, once the morphogen gradient is ongoing?
- Invariant scaling achieves the same proportions of embryos that vary in size. Do the authors know if the scaling mechanisms have the same tempo in embryos of different sizes?
- Shilo, B.-Z., & Barkai, N. (2017). Developmental Cell Perspective Buffering Global Variability of Morphogen Gradients. Developmental Cell, 40, 429–438. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.012.
- Garric, L., & Bakkers, J. (2018). Shaping up with morphogen gradients. Nature Cell Biology, 20(9), 998–999. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0168-2.
- Lawrence, P. A., & Levine, M. (2006). Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin. Current Biology, 16(7), R236–R239. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.016.
Posted on: 3rd December 2018Read preprint
Also in the developmental biology category:
The visual system of the genetically tractable crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: diversification of eyes and visual circuits associated with low-resolution vision
|Selected by||Alexa Sadier|
Distinct RhoGEFs activate apical and junctional actomyosin contractility under control of G proteins during epithelial morphogenesis
|Selected by||Ivana Viktorinová|
The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila
|Selected by||Abagael Lasseigne|
Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development
|Selected by||Rafael Galupa|
Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity
|Selected by||Yen-Chung Chen|
In vivo glucose imaging in multiple model organisms with an engineered single-wavelength sensor
|Selected by||Stephan Daetwyler|
Active behaviour during early development shapes glucocorticoid reactivity
|Selected by||Kathleen Gilmour|
A unicellular relative of animals generates an epithelium-like cell layer by actomyosin-dependent cellularization
|Selected by||Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello|
Members of the Arabidopsis auxin receptor gene family are essential early in embryogenesis and have broadly overlapping functions
|Selected by||Chandra Shekhar Misra|
The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos
|Selected by||Maiko Kitaoka|
Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation
|Selected by||Giulia Boezio|
Mutations in the Insulator Protein Suppressor of Hairy Wing Induce Genome Instability
|Selected by||Maiko Kitaoka|
Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues
|Selected by||Tim Fessenden|
Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming
|Selected by||Sergio Menchero|
MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis
|Selected by||Rudra Nayan Das|
Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing
|Selected by||Irepan Salvador-Martinez|