Menu

Close

Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation

Caleb Weinreb, Alejo E Rodriguez-Fraticelli, Fernando D Camargo, Allon M Klein

Preprint posted on December 01, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/12/01/467886

Lineage-traced scRNA-seq reveals that inheritable fate restriction occurring early in hematopoiesis is not detected computationally from the progenitor transcriptome.

Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

Background and context

Developmental biologists have long been picturing development as a process starting from a homogeneous population which becomes more and more different and eventually gives rise to a variety of terminally differentiated cell types. Waddington envisioned that this process governed by an “epigenetic landscape” is defined by genes and their interactions. Some key genes in the specification processes have been discovered since then, but the major regulators for most of the states in developmental processes remain uncharted to date.

The advent of massively parallel profiling techniques for single cells allows capturing a snapshot of a huge number of cell states simultaneously. When capturing cells from different stages, the similarity between the cells can be utilized to determine cell types and to reconstruct the developmental paths leading to each type.

Single cell profiling techniques have helped in the discovery of otherwise unannotated cell types and genes that might tune how a cell commits to a particular fate. However, because the techniques only capture snapshots of different states but not how they change in time, it’s challenging to determine whether each cell decides their goal early on and progresses along that particular branch to become a certain type, or if the cells remain plastic and carry the potential to switch trajectories along the way before becoming terminally differentiated. As a result, the reconstructed developmental paths need to be validated by experiments like lineage tracing to understand the degree of coupling between an early state and a terminally differentiated state.

Key findings

Lineage tracing experiments are often of lower throughput and require a specific early marker. One way to address this challenge is to label developing cells with unique barcodes that are heritable through cell divisions, and infer later whether two cell types come from the same progenitor pool by calculating the degree of barcode overlap between the two mature cell types. In this preprint, Weinreb et al. first barcoded murine hematopoietic progenitor cells using lentivirus. Then, the cells were cultured in a condition enabling multilineage differentiation and were allowed to proliferate for two days. The cells were collected on day 2, day 4, and day 6 of in vitro differentiation. By matching barcodes, this technique gives transcriptome and clonal information for multiple stages of differentiation.

Collecting clonal and transcriptome information allowed the authors to examine two important questions: Whether the differentiating cells are really progressing through a branching process, in which one cell cannot contribute to alternative fates once it has passed the branching point, and whether the time of branching event can be determined from the transcriptome alone (See figure 1).

Figure 1. Lineage-traced single cell RNA-seq helps estimate the relationships between transcriptionally defined cell states (Adapted from figure 1 of the preprint, under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license).

 

The authors first demonstrated that the cells of a particular transcriptionally defined type share most of their barcodes, indicating that transcriptionally determined cell types arose from different populations of progenitors. Then, the authors compared if transcriptomes of differentiated sister cells (“lateral prediction”) predict a cell’s fate better than the transcriptomes of progenitor sister cells (“forward prediction”), and discovered predictions from differentiated sister cells are more accurate. This difference in prediction power before and after differentiation could either be a result of the noisy nature of single cell RNA-seq which masks minor transcriptional differences, or it suggests that cellular properties other than the transcriptome also modulate cell fate decision.

To understand the exact point when a cell’s fate is specified, the authors used several computational methods to predict the time of diversification events, and compared the predicted time points to the point when different clones no longer contribute to the alternative fate. It turned out a cell’s ability to commit to other paths is restricted much earlier than what was predicted computationally based on the transcriptome alone.

Taken together, by combining clonal and transcriptome information, the authors showed that transcriptionally defined cell types in hematopoiesis are also clonally distinct. Furthermore, they showed that changes in the transcriptome correlate well with developmental time, and that fate restriction precedes overall transcriptomic discretion in development and might be better predicted by examining master cell fate regulators alone.

Why I like this preprint

The high-throughput nature of single cell profiling techniques enables researchers to study cells with different states with a high resolution. Nonetheless, it is challenging to understand how these states are related to each other because the profiling technique is essentially snapshot taking and provides no information about relationships. Multiple assumptions are required in developmental biology to learn the continuous process of development from single cell profiling. Two common assumptions are that the differentiation process is a branching and definite process, and that similarity in transcriptomes can be interpreted as temporal proximity. This preprint focuses on these key questions and benchmarks them experimentally. Although the necessity to separate sister cells limits the use of this technique, when applicable, it could be used to better capture development as a continuous process.

Open questions

  1. In a previous study [1], the authors utilized an elegant clonal tagging by an inducible transposable element in a mouse model, while lentiviral transduction was used in the preprint. I was wondering what the considerations behind the different methods chosen.
  2. The authors devised an elegant and user-friendly visualization tool for single cell profiling data [2], and in this preprint, the authors used SPRING plot to visualize multimodal (expression and clonal identity) data. I was wondering if it would be a plan to add this functionality to the tool, for it would be a great asset to the community.

References

  1. Sun, J. et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature 514, 322–327 (2014).
  2. Weinreb, C., Wolock, S. & Klein, A. M. SPRING: A kinetic interface for visualizing high dimensional single-cell expression data. Bioinformatics 34, 1246–1248 (2018).

Tags: hematopoiesis, lineage tracing, scrna-seq

Posted on: 5th February 2019 , updated on: 6th February 2019

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • 1 comment

    3 months

    Allon Klein

    Thanks for a great summary of our paper! I can suggest some points related to your open questions:

    Q1: How to barcode? Inducible transposable elements or lentiviral transduction? The transposable elements are fantastic for non-perturbative barcoding in vivo. Their limitation is that they don’t create a barcode expressed in mRNA. So they can’t be read out by single cell RNA-Seq. The lentiviral approach has the big disadvantage of requiring a massive perturbation (namely isolating the cells and infecting them in vitro), but it allows reading out a barcode by scRNA-Seq.

    Q2: Thanks for the great suggestion to visualize clonal data using SPRING! We don’t yet have an “all in one” package that goes from raw clonal data to completed analyses on SPRING yet. It’s a great idea.

    5

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the bioinformatics category:

    Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences

    Huanle Liu, Oguzhan Begik, Morghan C Lucas, et al.



    Selected by Christian Bates

    1

    Slide-seq: A Scalable Technology for Measuring Genome-Wide Expression at High Spatial Resolution

    Samuel G Rodriques, Robert R Stickels, Aleksandrina Goeva, et al.

    AND

    High-density spatial transcriptomics arrays for in situ tissue profiling

    Sanja Vickovic, Goekcen Eraslan, Johanna Klughammer, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Charting a tissue from single-cell transcriptomes

    Mor Nitzan, Nikos Karaiskos, Nir Friedman, et al.



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes and their predicted functions

    Hila Sberro, Nicholas Greenfield, Georgios Pavlopoulos, et al.



    Selected by Ganesh Kadamur

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer



    Selected by Romain F. Laine

    The embryonic transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Falko Hofmann, Michael A Schon, Michael D Nodine



    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra

    1

    The landscape of antigen-specific T cells in human cancers

    Bo Li, Longchao Liu, Jian Zhang, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals novel cell differentiation dynamics during human airway epithelium regeneration

    Sandra Ruiz Garcia, Marie Deprez, Kevin Lebrigand, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Target-specific precision of CRISPR-mediated genome editing

    Anob M Chakrabarti, Tristan Henser-Brownhill, Josep Monserrat, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Precise tuning of gene expression output levels in mammalian cells

    Yale S. Michaels, Mike B Barnkob, Hector Barbosa, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs

    Chong Tang, Tian Yu, Yeming Xie, et al.



    Selected by Fabio Liberante

    An atlas of the aging lung mapped by single cell transcriptomics and deep tissue proteomics

    Ilias Angelidis, Lukas M Simon, Isis E Fernandez, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    SWI/SNF remains localized to chromatin in the presence of SCHLAP1

    Jesse R Raab, Keriayn N Smith, Camarie C Spear, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    1

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    The visual system of the genetically tractable crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: diversification of eyes and visual circuits associated with low-resolution vision

    Ana Patricia Ramos, Ola Gustafsson, Nicolas Labert, et al.



    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    Distinct RhoGEFs activate apical and junctional actomyosin contractility under control of G proteins during epithelial morphogenesis

    Alain Garcia De Las Bayonas, Jean-Marc Philippe, Annemarie C. Lellouch, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    1

    The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila

    Austin Q Seroka, Chris Q Doe



    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne

    1

    Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development

    Christina Paliou, Philine Guckelberger, Robert Schöpflin, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity

    Myungin Baek, Vilas Menon, Thomas Jessell, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    In vivo glucose imaging in multiple model organisms with an engineered single-wavelength sensor

    Jacob P. Keller, Jonathan S. Marvin, Haluk Lacin, et al.



    Selected by Stephan Daetwyler

    1

    Active behaviour during early development shapes glucocorticoid reactivity

    Luis A. Castillo-Ramírez, Soojin Ryu, Rodrigo J. De Marco



    Selected by Kathleen Gilmour

    A unicellular relative of animals generates an epithelium-like cell layer by actomyosin-dependent cellularization

    Omaya Dudin, Andrej Ondracka, Xavier Grau-Bové, et al.



    Selected by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    1

    Members of the Arabidopsis auxin receptor gene family are essential early in embryogenesis and have broadly overlapping functions

    Michael J Prigge, Nikita Kadakia, Kathleen Greenham, et al.



    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra

    1

    The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos

    Janet Chenevert, Marianne Roca, Lydia Besnardeau, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation

    Jean Francois Darrigrand, Mariana Valente, Pauline Martinez, et al.



    Selected by Giulia Boezio

    Mutations in the Insulator Protein Suppressor of Hairy Wing Induce Genome Instability

    Shih-Jui Hsu, Emily C. Stow, James R. Simmons, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    1

    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.



    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Also in the systems biology category:

    Spreading of molecular mechanical perturbations on linear filaments

    Zsombor Balassy, Anne-Marie Lauzon, Lennart Hilbert



    Selected by Lars Hubatsch

    Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation

    Caleb Weinreb, Alejo E Rodriguez-Fraticelli, Fernando D Camargo, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    1

    Short-range interactions govern cellular dynamics in microbial multi-genotype systems

    Alma Dal Co, Simon van Vliet, Daniel Johannes Kiviet, et al.

    AND

    Rapid microbial interaction network inference in microfluidic droplets

    Ryan H Hsu, Ryan L Clark, Jin Wei Tan, et al.



    Selected by Connor Rosen

    High-throughput functional analysis of lncRNA core promoters elucidates rules governing tissue-specificity

    Kaia Mattioli, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara Gerhardinger, et al.



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    Variability of bacterial behavior in the mammalian gut captured using a growth-linked single-cell synthetic gene oscillator

    David T Riglar, David L Richmond, Laurent Potvin-Trottier, et al.



    Selected by Meng Zhu

    Charting a tissue from single-cell transcriptomes

    Mor Nitzan, Nikos Karaiskos, Nir Friedman, et al.



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes and their predicted functions

    Hila Sberro, Nicholas Greenfield, Georgios Pavlopoulos, et al.



    Selected by Ganesh Kadamur

    Symmetry breaking in the embryonic skin triggers a directional and sequential front of competence during plumage patterning

    Richard Bailleul, Carole Desmarquet-Trin Dinh, Magdalena Hidalgo, et al.



    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    RNase L reprograms translation by widespread mRNA turnover escaped by antiviral mRNAs

    James M Burke, Stephanie L Moon, Evan T Lester, et al.



    Selected by Connor Rosen

    Acquired interbacterial defense systems protect against interspecies antagonism in the human gut microbiome

    Benjamin D. Ross, Adrian J. Verster, Matthew C. Radey, et al.



    Selected by Connor Rosen

    DNA microscopy: Optics-free spatio-genetic imaging by a stand-alone chemical reaction

    Joshua A. Weinstein, Aviv Regev, Feng Zhang



    Selected by Theo Sanderson

    2

    The Toll pathway inhibits tissue growth and regulates cell fitness in an infection-dependent manner

    Federico Germani, Daniel Hain, Denise Sternlicht, et al.



    Selected by Rohan Khadilkar

    LCM-seq reveals unique transcriptional adaption mechanisms of resistant neurons in spinal muscular atrophy

    Susanne Nichterwitz, Helena Storvall, Jik Nijssen, et al.

    AND

    Axon-seq decodes the motor axon transcriptome and its modulation in response to ALS

    Jik Nijssen, Julio Cesar Aguila Benitez, Rein Hoogstraaten, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    2

    Conserved phosphorylation hotspots in eukaryotic protein domain families

    Marta J Strumillo, Michaela Oplova, Cristina Vieitez, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control

    Mayuri Rege, Ji Hun Kim, Jacqueline Valeri, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira
    Close