Mechanical control of morphogenesis robustness
Preprint posted on January 06, 2020 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.06.896266v1
Feel the force – anisotropic tissue tension away from cell shape changes is essential for morphogenesis robustness in Drosophila leg formation
Patterning is essential for ensuring that morphogenetic events occur with appropriate timing and position. The best known process is the specification of body plans by the Hox genes. Patterning genes are ordinally transcriptional factors that control huge gene networks, including cytoskeletal regulators, which are responsible for the downstream changes in cell behaviour and shape. More recently, research in this area has focussed on morphogenesis robustness, which refers to the idea of constraining the level of variation, in processes where variation is likely to occur. The latest preprint from the Suzanne group highlights the importance of the actin cytoskeleton in ensuring morphogenesis robustness, in a separate process to generating force in the morphogenetic event itself. The model used by Martin et al. was the Drosophila leg. During development the forming appendage must form four strictly parallel folds. How this patterning occurs has been well described and is dependent on sequential Notch activation, expression of pro-apoptotic genes, subsequent force generation by apical myosin in the apoptotic cells, resulting in constriction and tissue folding.
Using an RNAi screen, the authors found that depletion of Arp2/3 caused defects in folding, but with a highly variable array of phenotypes, making it a good candidate for involvement in morphogenesis robustness. When focussing on Arpc5 knockdown, they found no defects in Notch activation, apoptotic pattern formation, or the ability of these cells to send mechanical signals to induce the fold. In fact, they found that the folds are initially correctly positioned but then lose their way, heading for regions enriched in Myosin II (MyoII) and under high tension. These findings are recapitulated in silico, when a mechanical perturbation, in close vicinity to the fold, is introduced into a previously published computational model from the authors.
However, these regions of high tension are also present in the wild type tissue, but in this case, the fold formations are immune to its effects, indicating that isolation is required between fold domains and the rest of the tissue. The authors speculated that this isolation arises from the planar polarised enrichment of MyoII and the resulting anisotropic junctional tension, directing biased force transmission. To test whether this is important for fold formation, the authors used a non-planar polarised GFP trap to redistribute Myosin Regulatory Light Chain::GFP. The resulting leg discs recapitulated the Arpc5 phenotype with deviated folds. Because the authors have the in silico model they are also able ask the converse question, whether introducing planar polarity into a non-polarised tissue is sufficient to rescue the fold formation, and find that it is.
Overall this preprint combines elegant experiments, both in vivo and in silico to describe a new, direct role for the actin cytoskeleton in morphogenesis robustness.
Questions arising from this work
- Is the role of the actin cytoskeleton a process novel to Drosophila leg development, or general feature of tissues undergoing morphogenesis?
- Is Arp2/3 complex itself planar polarised and how does it transduce planar polarity to MyoII?
- Is the planar polarity of the tissue more generally disrupted and does this have any functional consequences independent of tissue folding?
Hox info – McGinnis and Krumlauf, 1992
The science behind the folds – de Celis et al., 1998; Rauskolb and Irvine, 1999 Manjón et al., 2007
What is morphogenesis robustness – Frankel et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2018
Posted on: 10th February 2020Read preprint
Also in the developmental biology category:
Antigenic variation by switching inter-chromosomal interactions with an RNA splicing locus in trypanosomes
|Selected by||Mariana De Niz|
DRP1-mediated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics determines the apoptotic response upon embryonic differentiation
|Selected by||Katarzyna Kuzmicz-Kowalska|
Regeneration in the adult Drosophila brain
|Selected by||Ivana Viktorinová|
preListsdevelopmental biology category:in the
ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019
A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)
|List by||Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka|
EDBC Alicante 2019
Preprints presented at the European Developmental Biology Congress (EDBC) in Alicante, October 23-26 2019.
|List by||Sergio Menchero, Jesus Victorino, Teresa Rayon, Irepan Salvador-Martinez|
EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life
Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019
|List by||Gautam Dey|
SDB 78th Annual Meeting 2019
A curation of the preprints presented at the SDB meeting in Boston, July 26-30 2019. The preList will be updated throughout the duration of the meeting.
|List by||Alex Eve|
Lung Disease and Regeneration
This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.
|List by||Rob Hynds|
Young Embryologist Network Conference 2019
Preprints presented at the Young Embryologist Network 2019 conference, 13 May, The Francis Crick Institute, London
|List by||Alex Eve|
Pattern formation during development
The aim of this preList is to integrate results about the mechanisms that govern patterning during development, from genes implicated in the processes to theoritical models of pattern formation in nature.
|List by||Alexa Sadier|
BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
|List by||Gautam Dey|
A compilation of cutting-edge research that uses the zebrafish as a model system to elucidate novel immunological mechanisms in health and disease.
|List by||Shikha Nayar|