Periodic spatial patterning with a single morphogen

Background

How tissues establish and maintain spatial organisation remains a guiding question in studies of development, homeostasis and regeneration. Spatial organisation of cell types — pattern formation — is critical for tissue functionality. Hence, deciphering the mechanisms that establish this order helps to trace causes of organ dysregulation, and to refine tissue engineering strategies.

Seventy years ago, Alan Turing proposed a two-morphogen circuit to explain periodic patterning [1]. A slow-diffusing activator morphogen promotes the expression of itself as well as of a fast- diffusing repressor morphogen (Fig. 1a). This in turn represses the activator. Activator-inhibitor circuits, or generic mechanisms of local-activation and long-range inhibition[2, 3] , can facilitate spontaneous symmetry breaking in homogeneous tissues. These models have been successful in explaining the development of hair follicles [4], feather buds [5] and mammalian palate rugae [6].

Traditional Turing mechanisms involve a stringent constraint on morphogen diffusibility: one morphogen must diffuse faster than the other. This presents a challenge for validating putative examples of natural Turing patterning, given measuring morphogen diffusion is notoriously challenging [7], and for building synthetic patterning circuits. Recent theoretical work has shown that these constraints can be relaxed when additional non-diffusible species are included in the circuit [8], shown experimentally for digit patterning [9].

In this pre-print, Wang et al. demonstrate that periodic patterning can be achieved by simpler mechanisms than previously anticipated, providing new perspectives on natural patterning and scope for synthetic patterning circuit design.

Key findings

A single morphogen can generate spatial patterns.

In classical Turing systems, spatial separation between patterned domains is associated with the speed of morphogen diffusion. When activator diffusion approaches zero, spacing becomes negligible. In contrast to the idealised continuum model, biological space is discretised by cell-boundaries, placing a hard-limit on patterning length-scale. Exploring patterning on a discretised cell lattice for an extreme case where activators cannot diffuse beyond cellular boundaries, Wang et al. demonstrate through simulations that tissues can nonetheless break symmetry. Such cases are however limited in patterning length-scale, at most establishing expression patterns that repeat every cell pair (Fig. 1b).

The authors then diverge from a standard analysis of Turing systems, which generally investigate symmetry breaking from the homogeneous steady-state, instead analysing patterning dynamics when tissues are initialised with a small domain of heightened activator expression. Remarkably, these simulations establish periodic patterns of activator expression, laid down sequentially behind a propagation wavefront (Fig. 1c-d). The simple single-morphogen circuit is capable of sequentially replicating the initial perturbation at equal spacings, generating concentric rings of activation when initialised with a spot, or repeated stripes when initialised with a line. In natural development, this initial perturbation could be provided by an initial pre-pattern or a boundary  cue.

 

Noise can abbrogate patterning capacity.

To establish patterns robustly, both natural and synthetic development need to cope with fluctuations. Noise (e.g. transcriptional bursting) presents an unavoidable constraint. The authors show that patterning is disrupted with even small noise amplitudes under this model, as measured by a failure to propagate further iterations, and regularity loss in the resultant pattern (Fig. 2a-b). Noise acutely affects unpatterned regions: existing domains of activator-expression are maintained despite higher noise levels. Thus, depending on the spatiotemporal context, the feedback architecture of the circuit can either favour or disfavour patterning robustness: strong feedback between the activator and repressor sustains patterned domains against noise, yet the same feedback amplifies random fluctuations in unpatterned regions.

Strategies for robust patterning

These analyses inspired the authors to elaborate the circuit, optimising feedback strength to maintain existing patterns while minimising noise-induced spurious initiation. They added a modulator species that is activated by the repressor i.e. only in the vicinity of the patterned domain (Fig. 2c). The active modulator inhibits activator degradation. This wiring therefore establishes two regimes: in the presence of active modulator, the circuit is primed for patterning, allowing new iterations to emerge nearby existing patterns.  In its absence, patterning is muted. Simulations confirm that this novel circuit is more robust to noise than the original two-component model (Fig. 2d).

Instead of a spatial window of patterning competency, tissues may alternatively use dynamic boundaries to buffer noise. Wang et al. consider a simple model of tissue expansion: boundary cells progressively divide, providing new cells to participate in patterning. Coupling growth and patterning provides a strategy to buffer against noise, provided growth and patterning occur at similar speeds. Given periodic patterning often occurs in tandem with tissue growth (e.g. somites [10], digit phalanges [11]), evolution may have used this property as a design strategy.

 

What I liked about this pre-print

While Turing mechanisms have been posited to explain patterning across many developmental processes, connecting abstracted theory to cellular processes remains an active area of research. This work provides an important step to connect theory and biology, analysing plausible genetic circuits, and considering how natural constraints on spatial order — cell boundaries — can facilitate periodic patterning. The emphasis of translating the theoretical findings into testable biological hypotheses is compelling, providing blueprints for engineerable synthetic circuits and exploring patterning robustness in the face of noise. More generally, the work contributes to a growing literature that is redefining how we view morphogens, beyond the dichotomy between positional information and reaction-diffusion [12].

References

[1] Turing, A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37-72.

[2] Koch, A. J., & Meinhardt, H. (1994). Biological pattern formation: from basic mechanisms to complex structures. Reviews of modern physics, 66(4), 1481.

[3] Kondo, S., & Miura, T. (2010). Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science, 329(5999), 1616-1620.

[4] Sick, S., Reinker, S., Timmer, J. and Schlake, T., (2006). WNT and DKK determine hair follicle spacing through a reaction-diffusion mechanism. Science, 314(5804), 1447-1450.

[5] Ho, W.K., Freem, L., Zhao, D., Painter, K.J., Woolley, T.E., Gaffney, E.A., McGrew, M.J., Tzika, A., Milinkovitch, M.C., Schneider, P. and Drusko, A., (2019). Feather arrays are patterned by interacting signalling and cell density waves. PLoS biology, 17(2), e3000132.

[6] Economou, A.D., Ohazama, A., Porntaveetus, T., Sharpe, P.T., Kondo, S., Basson, M.A., Gritli-Linde, A., Cobourne, M.T. and Green, J., (2012). Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate. Nature genetics, 44(3), 348-351.

[7] Müller, P., Rogers, K.W., Yu, S.R., Brand, M. and Schier, A.F., (2013). Morphogen transport. Development, 140(8), 1621-1638.

[8] Marcon, L., Diego, X., Sharpe, J. and Müller, P., (2016). High-throughput mathematical analysis identifies Turing networks for patterning with equally diffusing signals. Elife, 5, e14022.

[9] Raspopovic, J., Marcon, L., Russo, L., & Sharpe, J. (2014). Digit patterning is controlled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing network modulated by morphogen gradients. Science, 345(6196), 566-570.

[10] Soroldoni, D., Jörg, D.J., Morelli, L.G., Richmond, D.L., Schindelin, J., Jülicher, F. and Oates, A.C., (2014). A Doppler effect in embryonic pattern formation. Science, 345(6193), 222-225.

[11] Huang, B. L., Trofka, A., Furusawa, A., Norrie, J. L., Rabinowitz, A. H., Vokes, S. A., … & Mackem, S. (2016). An interdigit signalling centre instructs coordinate phalanx-joint formation governed by 5′ Hoxd–Gli3 antagonism. Nature communications, 7(1), 1-10.

[12] Green, J.B. and Sharpe, J., 2015. Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine. Development, 142(7), pp.1203-1211.

[13] Werner, S., Stückemann, T., Amigo, M. B., Rink, J. C., Jülicher, F., & Friedrich, B. M. (2015). Scaling and regeneration of self-organized patterns. Physical review letters, 114(13), 138101.

[14] Jörg, D. J., Kitadate, Y., Yoshida, S., & Simons, B. D. (2019). Competition for stem cell fate determinants as a mechanism for tissue homeostasis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03903.

 

Posted on: 24 May 2022 , updated on: 9 June 2022

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.32174

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)