Quantification of gene expression patterns to reveal the origins of abnormal morphogenesis
Preprint posted on January 11, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/01/11/246256
In this pre-print, the Sharpe lab develops a tool to quantitatively characterize gene expression patterns in whole embryos. They identify a limb defect in a mouse model of Apert syndrome carrying a missense mutation on the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2. In particular, quantifying downstream target Dusp6 allows them to spot the appearance of the limb defects, which have previously remained difficult to discern in mouse models of Apert syndrome.
Why I chose the paper:
One of my mantras is that new discoveries arise when biological phenomena are revisited in quantitative terms, even though they could have been previously studied on the basis of qualitative analysis; this preprint nicely provides a new look at gene expression.
The description of gene expression patterns over time during development is the pillar for our understanding of how genes work. In situ hybridisation is as a long existing technique that can be performed in any organism that contains RNA, and it has been used to unravel where and when genes are expressed. However, this technique has always been considered qualitative, difficult to analyse in whole embryos, and subjective at times. Neus Martinez-Abadias and colleagues develop a tool that allows them to accurately measure and determine subtle spatial changes in gene expression patterns in mouse mutants by combining image analysis, segmentation, and geometric morphometrics. There are very few examples where morphometric approaches have been applied to study morphological variability, and precisely relate it to gene expression. In the method, the authors first image and segment the shape of the tissue, and the expression pattern of Dusp6. Then, they describe its shape in 3D as a set of landmark coordinates. In this way, they objectively compare tissue morphology with a given gene expression pattern across embryos at various developmental stages to identify previously unrecognised limb defects at the molecular level.
How this work moves the field forward:
This preprint advances our understanding of how spatio-temporal changes in gene expression culminate in phenotypic variation, and builds the path towards quantitative developmental biology.
Questions to the authors:
Since the technique is very powerful, I wonder the amount of time the authors dedicated to process the data, and how easily could it be applied in other labs.
Which do the authors think are the limitations of the technique?
How subtle can the changes be to define a given phenotype?
Have they tried to do the analysis with more than one gene?
Posted on: 7th February 2018 , updated on: 19th February 2018Read preprint
Also in the developmental biology category:
Polyacrylamide Bead Sensors for in vivo Quantification of Cell-Scale Stress in Zebrafish Development
|Selected by||Jacky G. Goetz|
millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning
|Selected by||Erik Clark|
Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans
Centrosome Aurora A gradient ensures a single PAR-2 polarity axis by regulating RhoGEF ECT-2 localization in C. elegans embryos
|Selected by||Giuliana Clemente|
Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling
|Selected by||Coert Margadant|
SOL1 and SOL2 Regulate Fate Transition and Cell Divisions in the Arabidopsis Stomatal Lineage
|Selected by||Martin Balcerowicz|
Analysis of the role of Nidogen/entactin in basement membrane assembly and morphogenesis in Drosophila
|Selected by||Nargess Khalilgharibi|
Neural crest cells regulate optic cup morphogenesis by promoting extracellular matrix assembly
|Selected by||Ashrifia Adomako-Ankomah|
Simultaneous production of diverse neuronal subtypes during early corticogenesis
|Selected by||Boyan Bonev|
mRNA localisation in endothelial cells regulates blood vessel sprouting
|Selected by||Andreas van Impel|
LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control
|Selected by||Ivan Candido-Ferreira|
Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis
|Selected by||Teresa Rayon|
The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila
|Selected by||Clarice Hong|
Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo
|Selected by||Angika Basant|
Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.
|Selected by||Sundar Naganathan|
A transition from SoxB1 to SoxE transcription factors is essential for progression from pluripotent blastula cells to neural crest cells
|Selected by||Amanda Haage|
Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots
|Selected by||Gautam Dey|