Menu

Close

Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs

Ariane Ramaekers, Simon Weinberger, Annelies Claeys, Martin Kapun, Jiekun Yan, Reinhard Wolf, Thomas Flatt, Erich Buchner, Bassem A. Hassan

Preprint posted on June 15, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/15/348375.full.pdf

Why do animals with large eyes have small noses and vice versa? By investigating this trade-off mechanism in detail in flies, the Hassan Lab traces it to a single nucleotide polymorphism.

Selected by Mariana R.P. Alves

Background

Across different species, eyes and olfactory organs (such as nose in mammals or antennae in flies) share the same developmental origin. In the fly, their origin is the eye-antennal imaginal disc (EAD). During development, eye and antennal related transcription factors are firstly co-expressed in the EAD, then progressively become restricted in space to form the eye and antennae subdivisions of the EAD before finally mutually repressing each other – a succession of events shared by other organisms. However, a trade-off between vision and olfaction has been observed in different organisms, in the form of phenotypical differences in ratios of eye to olfactory organs. There are cues suggesting that animals make use of this to adapt to the environment, but the mechanisms behind the molecular mechanism of sensory trade-off are still not fully clear. The authors of this preprint explored this question using Drosophila, which exhibits natural variation of eye sizes between and within species.

Key findings

The authors were able to pinpoint the origin of differential proportions of sensory organs both between and within Drosophila species. For this, they focus on eye-size variation, as a marker of vision/olfaction trade-off. They show that this variation originates in development, by differences in the proportion between eye and non-eye multipotent cells in the EAD. This differential proportion is controlled by temporal differences in the regulation of Eyeless (one of the four orthologues of Pax6 in Drosophila): when the segregation into two fields – Eyeless positive and negative – occurs earlier, this leads to increased eye size since Eyeless positive cells proliferate more. The authors traced back this temporally differential regulation between Drosophila species to ortholog enhancers of this gene. When the expression driven by these enhancers retracts from homogenous expression (of eye-antennae factors in the EAD) to the respective subdividing compartment at different velocities, the field segregation occurs at different times.

 

Visual schematic of the model proposed: differential proportion of sensory compartments caused by differential duration of uniform versus heterogeneous growth due to differential posterior retraction of ey. From Ramaekers et al., 2018, Figure 6 (under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0).

 

This logic is conserved within species. The authors show that the temporal differences observed in two Drosophila melanogaster strains are due to a single nucleotide polymorphism in the enhancer studied: the substitution of a Guanine to an Adenine, which is found in most natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster, with the exception of populations from Sub-Saharan Africa, which are mostly fixed for the Guanine-allele. This SNP is found at a sequence similar to the binding motif of an antennae-related transcription factor (Ct). The authors show causality between impairment of Ct activity (by RNAi knockdown) during EAD development and increased eye size. Experiments with synthetic eyeless enhancers suggest that, when the nucleotide substitution occurs, Ct binds with lower affinity to this enhancer, leading to decreased repression, and ultimately to different timing of EAD-field segregation and increased eye size. The authors finally determined that the eyeless cis regulatory SNP is indeed the cause to eye-size variation by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.

In addition, the authors tested the functional readout of facet number into visual acuity between Drosophila strains and saw that increased facet number leads to increased visual acuity, aiding the suggestion of eye-size regulation as an evolutionary mechanism for environment adaptation.

What I like about this preprint

I chose this preprint because I am particularly interested in transcriptional regulation throughout development. I really liked the completeness of this study. The uncovering of mechanisms into the tiniest detail fascinates me, and I feel that this study is very close to that. In addition, since my work is related with transcription factor binding, thus including binding affinities, I am amazed to see yet another study shedding light into the importance and consequences that differential binding affinity might have. In this case, in the “micro-scale”, a SNP causing a site to have lower affinity to a repressor, ultimately has such “macro-scale” phenotypical and functional effect. Finally, I also find it always interesting to learn about behavioural measurements, which I never performed (if you are also curious, check the methods for measurement of visual acuity!).

Open questions

I would be interested to know how important the authors think it would be to confirm if these mechanisms are conserved in vertebrates, and to see if there is a general pattern across animals for the biochemistry and molecular biology behind sensory trade-offs. In addition, in the shorter-term, would it be relevant to look into the regulation of the antennal structures? In this study, the trait measured was always eye-size. Would it possible to distinguish which is the evolutionary target of the adaptation – if vision, olfaction, or both?

 

Tags: drosophila, eyeless, fly, sensory, snp, trade-off

Posted on: 19th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

    Kerstin Klinkert, Nicolas Levernier, Peter Gross, et al.

    AND

    Centrosome Aurora A gradient ensures a single PAR-2 polarity axis by regulating RhoGEF ECT-2 localization in C. elegans embryos

    Sachin Kotak, Sukriti Kapoor



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.



    Selected by Coert Margadant

    SOL1 and SOL2 Regulate Fate Transition and Cell Divisions in the Arabidopsis Stomatal Lineage

    Abigail R Simmons, Kelli A Davies, Wanpeng Wang, et al.



    Selected by Martin Balcerowicz

    Analysis of the role of Nidogen/entactin in basement membrane assembly and morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Jianli Dai, Beatriz Estrada, Sofie Jacobs, et al.



    Selected by Nargess Khalilgharibi

    Neural crest cells regulate optic cup morphogenesis by promoting extracellular matrix assembly

    Chase Dallas Bryan, Rebecca Lynne Pfeiffer, Bryan William Jones, et al.



    Selected by Ashrifia Adomako-Ankomah

    1

    Simultaneous production of diverse neuronal subtypes during early corticogenesis

    Elia Magrinelli, Robin Jan Wagener, Denis Jabaudon



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    1

    mRNA localisation in endothelial cells regulates blood vessel sprouting

    Guilherme Costa, Nawseen Tarannum, Shane Herbert



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control

    Mayuri Rege, Ji Hun Kim, Jacqueline Valeri, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis

    Cerys S Manning, Veronica Biga, James Boyd, et al.



    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    1

    Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo

    Lars-Eric Fielmich, Ruben Schmidt, Daniel J Dickinson, et al.



    Selected by Angika Basant

    1

    Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.

    Jonathan B Michaux, Francois B Robin, William M McFadden, et al.



    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    A transition from SoxB1 to SoxE transcription factors is essential for progression from pluripotent blastula cells to neural crest cells

    Elsy Buitrago-Delgado, Elizabeth Schock, Kara Nordin, et al.



    Selected by Amanda Haage

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    Dynamic control of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1β and Tnf-α by macrophages is necessary for functional spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish

    Themistoklis M. Tsarouchas, Daniel Wehner, Leonardo Cavone, et al.



    Selected by Shikha Nayar

    1

    Also in the evolutionary biology category:

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    Conserved phosphorylation hotspots in eukaryotic protein domain families

    Marta J Strumillo, Michaela Oplova, Cristina Vieitez, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Peculiar features of the plastids of the colourless alga Euglena longa and photosynthetic euglenophytes unveiled by transcriptome analyses

    Kristina Zahonova, Zoltan Fussy, Erik Bircak, et al.



    Selected by Ellis O'Neill

    1

    The Ly6/uPAR protein Bouncer is necessary and sufficient for species-specific fertilization

    Sarah Herberg, Krista R Gert, Alexander Schleiffer, et al.



    Selected by James Gagnon

    Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position

    Chloe Moreau, Paolo Caldarelli, Didier Rocancourt, et al.



    Selected by Wouter Masselink

    The genomic basis of colour pattern polymorphism in the harlequin ladybird

    Mathieu Gautier, Junichi Yamaguchi, Julien Foucaud, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs

    Ariane Ramaekers, Simon Weinberger, Annelies Claeys, et al.



    Selected by Mariana R.P. Alves

    A robust method for transfection in choanoflagellates illuminates their cell biology and the ancestry of animal septins

    David Booth, Heather Middleton, Nicole King



    Selected by Maya Emmons-Bell

    A SoxB gene acts as an anterior gap gene and regulates posterior segment addition in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum

    Christian L. B. Paese, Anna Schoenauer, Daniel J. Leite, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    1

    Germ layer specific regulation of cell polarity and adhesion gives insight into the evolution of mesoderm.

    Miguel Salinas-Saavedra, Amber Q. Rock, Mark Q. Martindale



    Selected by ClaireS & SophieM

    1

    Wnt/β-catenin regulates an ancient signaling network during zebrafish scale development

    Andrew J Aman, Alexis N Fulbright, David M Parichy



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    Bacteriophage cooperation suppresses CRISPR-Cas3 and Cas9 immunity

    Adair L Borges, Jenny Y Zhang, MaryClare Rollins, et al.

    AND

    Anti-CRISPR phages cooperate to overcome CRISPR-Cas immunity

    Mariann Landsberger, Sylvain Gandon, Sean Meaden, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Dynamic Kinetochore Size Regulation Promotes Microtubule Capture And Chromosome Biorientation In Mitosis

    Carlos Sacristan, Misbha Ahmad, Jenny Keller, et al.

    AND

    Self-assembly of the RZZ complex into filaments drives kinetochore expansion in the absence of microtubule attachment

    Cláudia Pereira, Rita M Reis, José B Gama, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Individual- and population-level drivers of consistent foraging success across environments

    Lysanne Snijders, Ralf HJM Kurvers, Stefan Krause, et al.



    Selected by Rasmus Ern

    The ancestral animal genetic toolkit revealed by diverse choanoflagellate transcriptomes

    Daniel Richter, Parinaz Fozouni, Michael Eisen, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Genome-wide selection scans integrated with association mapping reveal mechanisms of physiological adaptation across a salinity gradient in killifish

    Reid S. Brennan, Timothy M. Healy, Heather J. Bryant, et al.



    Selected by Andy Turko
    Close