Menu

Close

Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position

Chloe Moreau, Paolo Caldarelli, Didier Rocancourt, Julian Roussel, Nicolas Denans, Olivier Pourquie, Jerome Gros

Preprint posted on June 20, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/06/20/351106

Positioning of the limb field was long suspected to be dependent on Hox activity. Moreau et al. show for the first time that in avian species limb field positioning is dependent on Hox collinear activation during early gastrulation.

Selected by Wouter Masselink

Background

The formation of paired appendages in general, and limbs specifically is a crucial adaptation, which provides mobility to animals. The correct positioning of the limbs along the AP axis is essential for a robust body plan and any deviation severely impedes the mobility of an animal. As such, while remarkable variation exists in the positioning of the limb across species, their position is highly robust within any given species. The positioning of limb outgrowth correlates with specific regions of the spine. The spine can generally be divided into 4 regions; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral. Across tetrapods forelimb outgrowth occurs at the level of the cervico-thoracic boundary, while hindlimb outgrowth occurs at the level of the lumbo-sacral boundary. It is well understood that AP identity is provided by the phenomenon of Hox collinearity and as such directly controls vertebral identity. Therefore, Hox collinearity was long suspected to instruct the positioning of limb fields ( for reviews see Tanaka 2013, Tanaka 2016, Tickle 2015) but was never formally shown. Now for the first time, Chloe Moreau and colleagues combine classical comparative anatomy with advanced over-expression studies to provide direct evidence that Hox code identities instruct limb field positioning.

 

Key findings

In their preprint Moreau and colleagues use classical chicken embryological studies to find that the position of the forelimb bud is already specified by the end of gastrulation. They took advantage of the tissue grafting amenability of the chicken and show that a forelimb region grafted in an inter-limb position (and vice versa) results in the limb bud appearing in an interlimb position. Specifically, HoxB4, HoxB7, and HoxB9 were identified to be sequentially expressed in the epiblast as the forelimb position is specified. The activation of HoxB4 and inhibition of HoxB9 was sufficient to induce a limb field in the inter-limb region. These data suggest that HoxB4 and HoxB9 act together to specify the position of the fore-limb in chicken embryos.

 

If this was indeed true, this should be conserved across species. While mammals show very little variability in the positioning of the fore limb, in birds there is significant variability. Chickens consistently form their limbs at the 15th vertebra, while zebra finches and ostriches do so at the 13th and 18th vertebra, respectively. Taking advantage of this fact, it was expected that Hoxb4 and Hoxb9 expression is shifted anteriorly in zebra finches and posteriorly in Ostriches. Indeed, Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundaries are shifted and this is consistent with the specification of the limb field.

 

In a final heroic effort, the authors attempted to shift the boundary of Hoxb4/Hoxb9 expression by modulation of retinoic acid (RA) activity. The RA metabolizing enzyme, Cyp26a1, is known to modulate Hox gene activities. Cyp26a1 has variable expression domains in chicken, zebra finch and ostrich consistent with their variable specification of the forelimb. Indeed, the authors found that modulating RA activity, by either supplying exogenous RA or an RA antagonist shifts the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary. Consistent with the observations made in ostrich and zebra finch embryos exogenous RA shifts the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary and the subsequent limb field posteriorly. Conversely, the inhibition of RA activity results in a posterior shift of the Hoxb4/Hoxb9 boundary and the associated limb field.

 

Taken together the authors convincingly show that the activation of Hoxb4 and repression of Hoxb9 are sufficient to induce the formation of the forelimb field and are responsible for the variability observed across bird species.

 

What I like about this work

This work takes advantage of the natural variability seen in the limb positioning of avian species. The authors use this variability to validate a long-suspected mechanism. The work is done rigorously showing both necessity and sufficiency, through several independent lines of work. Like any good piece of research, it answers one question while opening up several more.

 

Outlook

While the authors convincingly show how the expression domains of Hoxb4 and Hoxb9 specify the Tbx5 positive limb field, and thus specifies the position of the future limb. It makes me wonder if the authors attempted more longitudinal studies to see whether a shifting limb field also changes further downstream processes such as skeleton formation and nerve innervation. Also, is this a general mechanism which applies across all species with paired appendages or is it restricted to avian species or tetrapods? Given that Hox collinearity is an ancient patterning mechanism also seen in insects and jawless vertebrates, I would suspect that appendages in general is likely dependent on similar mechanisms and should thus also apply to both bony and cartilaginous fish. As such it would be interesting to see if the findings reported here also apply to skates. Skates are members of the cartilaginous fish family and have dramatically enlarged pectoral fins. If a similar mechanism applies in specifying the pectoral fin field in skates, one would expect a relative expansion of the hoxb4 domain, while Hoxb9 should be shifted further posteriorly. This should result in a wider fin bud allowing for the subsequent expansion of the pectoral fin domain.

 

References

  1. Tanaka, M. (2013). Molecular and evolutionary basis of limb field specification and limb initiation. Dev. Growth Differ. 55, 149–163.
  2. Tanaka, M. (2016). Developmental Mechanism of Limb Field Specification along the Anterior–Posterior Axis during Vertebrate Evolution. J. Dev. Biol. 4, 18.
  3. Tickle, C. (2015). How the embryo makes a limb: determination, polarity and identity. J. Anat. 227, 418–430.

Tags: chicken, hox, limb, positional identity

Posted on: 27th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    The visual system of the genetically tractable crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: diversification of eyes and visual circuits associated with low-resolution vision

    Ana Patricia Ramos, Ola Gustafsson, Nicolas Labert, et al.



    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    Distinct RhoGEFs activate apical and junctional actomyosin contractility under control of G proteins during epithelial morphogenesis

    Alain Garcia De Las Bayonas, Jean-Marc Philippe, Annemarie C. Lellouch, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    1

    The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila

    Austin Q Seroka, Chris Q Doe



    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne

    1

    Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development

    Christina Paliou, Philine Guckelberger, Robert Schöpflin, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity

    Myungin Baek, Vilas Menon, Thomas Jessell, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    In vivo glucose imaging in multiple model organisms with an engineered single-wavelength sensor

    Jacob P. Keller, Jonathan S. Marvin, Haluk Lacin, et al.



    Selected by Stephan Daetwyler

    1

    Active behaviour during early development shapes glucocorticoid reactivity

    Luis A. Castillo-Ramírez, Soojin Ryu, Rodrigo J. De Marco



    Selected by Kathleen Gilmour

    A unicellular relative of animals generates an epithelium-like cell layer by actomyosin-dependent cellularization

    Omaya Dudin, Andrej Ondracka, Xavier Grau-Bové, et al.



    Selected by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    1

    Members of the Arabidopsis auxin receptor gene family are essential early in embryogenesis and have broadly overlapping functions

    Michael J Prigge, Nikita Kadakia, Kathleen Greenham, et al.



    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra

    1

    The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos

    Janet Chenevert, Marianne Roca, Lydia Besnardeau, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation

    Jean Francois Darrigrand, Mariana Valente, Pauline Martinez, et al.



    Selected by Giulia Boezio

    Mutations in the Insulator Protein Suppressor of Hairy Wing Induce Genome Instability

    Shih-Jui Hsu, Emily C. Stow, James R. Simmons, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    1

    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.



    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Also in the evolutionary biology category:

    The visual system of the genetically tractable crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: diversification of eyes and visual circuits associated with low-resolution vision

    Ana Patricia Ramos, Ola Gustafsson, Nicolas Labert, et al.



    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    A unicellular relative of animals generates an epithelium-like cell layer by actomyosin-dependent cellularization

    Omaya Dudin, Andrej Ondracka, Xavier Grau-Bové, et al.



    Selected by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    1

    The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos

    Janet Chenevert, Marianne Roca, Lydia Besnardeau, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    Evolution-guided design of super-restrictor antiviral proteins reveals a breadth-versus-specificity tradeoff

    Rossana S Colon-Thillet, Emily S Hsieh, Laura Graf, et al.



    Selected by Connor Rosen

    Establishment of the mayfly Cloeon dipterum as a new model system to investigate insect evolution

    Isabel Almudi, Carlos Martin-Blanco, Isabel Maria Garcia-Fernandez, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    1

    Symmetry breaking in the embryonic skin triggers a directional and sequential front of competence during plumage patterning

    Richard Bailleul, Carole Desmarquet-Trin Dinh, Magdalena Hidalgo, et al.



    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    Bridging the divide: bacteria synthesizing archaeal membrane lipids

    Laura Villanueva, F. A. Bastiaan von Meijenfeldt, Alexander B. Westbye, et al.

    AND

    Extensive transfer of membrane lipid biosynthetic genes between Archaea and Bacteria

    Gareth A. Coleman, Richard D. Pancost, Tom A. Williams



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Eukaryotic acquisition of a bacterial operon

    Jacek Kominek, Drew T. Doering, Dana A. Opulente, et al.



    Selected by Lauren Neves

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    Conserved phosphorylation hotspots in eukaryotic protein domain families

    Marta J Strumillo, Michaela Oplova, Cristina Vieitez, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Peculiar features of the plastids of the colourless alga Euglena longa and photosynthetic euglenophytes unveiled by transcriptome analyses

    Kristina Zahonova, Zoltan Fussy, Erik Bircak, et al.



    Selected by Ellis O'Neill

    1

    The Ly6/uPAR protein Bouncer is necessary and sufficient for species-specific fertilization

    Sarah Herberg, Krista R Gert, Alexander Schleiffer, et al.



    Selected by James Gagnon

    Timed collinear activation of Hox genes during gastrulation controls the avian forelimb position

    Chloe Moreau, Paolo Caldarelli, Didier Rocancourt, et al.



    Selected by Wouter Masselink

    The genomic basis of colour pattern polymorphism in the harlequin ladybird

    Mathieu Gautier, Junichi Yamaguchi, Julien Foucaud, et al.



    Selected by Fillip Port

    Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs

    Ariane Ramaekers, Simon Weinberger, Annelies Claeys, et al.



    Selected by Mariana R.P. Alves
    Close