Force inference predicts local and tissue-scale stress patterns in epithelia

Weiyuan Kong, Olivier Loison, Pruthvi Chavadimane Shivakumar, Claudio Collinet, Pierre-François Lenne, Raphaël Clément

Preprint posted on December 04, 2018

How to probe tissue mechanics without performing an invasive experiment? Kong et al. discuss and validate the force inference methodology.

Selected by Sundar Naganathan


Embryo morphogenesis is inherently a mechanical process, where tissues fold, bend, loop and involute to reach their final geometries. In this regard, several techniques such as micropipette aspiration, magnetic tweezers and droplet injection have been developed in the last few years to probe the mechanics of epithelial tissues1. However, these techniques are generally invasive to the sample being investigated and are laborious to perform. There is an urgent need therefore to develop non-invasive methodologies to study tissue mechanics. The force inference method provides a good alternative to obtain relative estimates of stress distribution in a tissue in a non-invasive fashion.

The force inference methodexploits the idea that at mechanical equilibrium, cell shapes are determined by a balance of contact forces between cells. Therefore, if cell shapes can be precisely determined by imaging followed by image segmentation, this method can be used for inferring relative tensions in a tissue. In the highlighted manuscript, the authors validate the force inference method numerically as well as experimentally by performing laser ablation in Drosophila tissues. They demonstrate the robustness of the force inference methodology in predicting stress patterns from single cell to tissue length scales.

Key findings

The authors first validated the force inference method, by generating in silico tissues using the Surface Evolver software. A classical vertex model was used to generate a user defined surface, where tensions at the edges of cells and pressures in cells were assigned a pre-determined value. Based on these values, the software then performs energy minimization of the surface to yield a final geometry. From the final geometry, cell shapes were determined following which the force inference method was used to infer forces in the energy minimized surface. The authors find an excellent agreement between the pre-determined tension/pressure maps and the distribution of forces determined by the force inference method.

The authors then proceed to compare the force inference method with laser ablation experiments performed in three different Drosophila tissues at different length scales. Single junctional tension was probed in the pupal notum, changes in tension across a small group of cells was analyzed in the ommatidia (four cone cells are present in a single ommatidium) and large-scale tension in a tissue across hundreds of cells was evaluated in the germband. For the ommatidia and germband case studies, mutant conditions were also tested. In each case, laser ablation was performed and the associated recoil velocity upon ablation was measured. The recoil velocity is proportional to the tension in the region of interest prior to the ablation. In addition, the force inference method was used to infer tension in the three tissues. The inferred tension and measured recoil velocity were highly correlated in each of the three cases suggesting that the force inference method provides robust relative estimates of stress patterns in a developing tissue.

Why I chose this preprint?

The biggest advantage of the force inference method is that it is non-invasive. It still relies on various assumptions in the different models used for force inference. However, it provides a good complementary approach to invasive methodologies and allows researchers to infer forces in hard-to-access tissues that are deep inside embryos. Moreover, the methodology allows force inference across different length scales – from cell level dynamics to tissue-scale morphogenesis.

Open questions

  1. A pre-requisite for using the force inference method involves precise segmentation of the tissue of interest. The tissues chosen in this article are relatively easy to segment given the high contrast of the fluorescence signal. How should one proceed with using the force inference method for tissues where segmentation is noisy and error-prone?
  2. A major assumption in the method that allows for inferring forces is that tissues are at mechanical equilibrium. However, this is not the case in many contexts of tissue morphogenesis, where cells undergo dynamic shape changes. What criteria can be used to determine when not to use the force inference method?


  1. Sugimura K, Lenne P-F and Graner F, Measuring forces and stresses in situ in living tissues, Development, 2016.
  2. Ishihara S and Sugimura K, Bayesian inference of force dynamics during morphogenesis, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2012.

Tags: contractility, fly, force balance, material properties, tension

Posted on: 17th January 2019

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the biophysics category:

    The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes

    Shintaro Maeda, Chinatsu Otomo, Takanori Otomo

    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Effective concentrations enforced by intrinsically disordered linkers are governed by polymer physics

    Charlotte S. Sørensen, Magnus Kjaergaard

    Selected by Tessa Sinnige


    Spreading of molecular mechanical perturbations on linear filaments

    Zsombor Balassy, Anne-Marie Lauzon, Lennart Hilbert

    Selected by Lars Hubatsch

    Blue light induces neuronal-activity-regulated gene expression in the absence of optogenetic proteins

    Kelsey M. Tyssowski, Jesse M. Gray

    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    HIV-1 Gag specifically restricts PI(4,5)P2 and cholesterol mobility in living cells creating a nanodomain platform for virus assembly

    C. Favard, J. Chojnacki, P. Merida, et al.

    Selected by Amberley Stephens

    Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high resolution cryo-EM

    Claudio Schmidli, Stefan Albiez, Luca Rima, et al.

    Selected by David Wright


    Vincent Mercier, Jorge Larios, Guillaume Molinard, et al.

    Selected by Nicola Stevenson


    Planar differential growth rates determine the position of folds in complex epithelia

    Melda Tozluoğlu, Maria Duda, Natalie J Kirkland, et al.


    Buckling of epithelium growing under spherical confinement

    Anastasiya Trushko, Ilaria Di Meglio, Aziza Merzouki, et al.

    Selected by Sundar Naganathan


    Microtubules stabilize intercellular contractile force transmission during tissue folding

    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Dynamic Aha1 Co-Chaperone Binding to Human Hsp90

    Javier Oroz, Laura J Blair, Markus Zweckstetter

    Selected by Reid Alderson


    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.

    Selected by Robert Mahen


    Central spindle microtubules are strongly coupled to chromosomes during both anaphase A and anaphase B

    Che-Hang Yu, Stefanie Redemann, Hai-Yin Wu, et al.

    Selected by Federico Pelisch


    Mechanical Stretch Kills Transformed Cancer Cells

    Ajay Tijore, Mingxi Yao, Yu-Hsiu Wang, et al.

    Selected by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.

    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single molecule localization microscopy with autonomous feedback loops for ultrahigh precision

    Simao Coelho, Jongho Baek, Matthew S Graus, et al.

    Selected by Lars Hubatsch

    Phase transition and amyloid formation by a viral protein as an additional molecular mechanism of virus-induced cell toxicity

    Edoardo Salladini, Claire Debarnot, Vincent Delauzun, et al.

    Selected by Tessa Sinnige

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    The visual system of the genetically tractable crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis: diversification of eyes and visual circuits associated with low-resolution vision

    Ana Patricia Ramos, Ola Gustafsson, Nicolas Labert, et al.

    Selected by Alexa Sadier

    Distinct RhoGEFs activate apical and junctional actomyosin contractility under control of G proteins during epithelial morphogenesis

    Alain Garcia De Las Bayonas, Jean-Marc Philippe, Annemarie C. Lellouch, et al.

    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová


    The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila

    Austin Q Seroka, Chris Q Doe

    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne


    Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development

    Christina Paliou, Philine Guckelberger, Robert Schöpflin, et al.

    Selected by Rafael Galupa


    Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity

    Myungin Baek, Vilas Menon, Thomas Jessell, et al.

    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    In vivo glucose imaging in multiple model organisms with an engineered single-wavelength sensor

    Jacob P. Keller, Jonathan S. Marvin, Haluk Lacin, et al.

    Selected by Stephan Daetwyler


    Active behaviour during early development shapes glucocorticoid reactivity

    Luis A. Castillo-Ramírez, Soojin Ryu, Rodrigo J. De Marco

    Selected by Kathleen Gilmour

    A unicellular relative of animals generates an epithelium-like cell layer by actomyosin-dependent cellularization

    Omaya Dudin, Andrej Ondracka, Xavier Grau-Bové, et al.

    Selected by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello


    Members of the Arabidopsis auxin receptor gene family are essential early in embryogenesis and have broadly overlapping functions

    Michael J Prigge, Nikita Kadakia, Kathleen Greenham, et al.

    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra


    The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos

    Janet Chenevert, Marianne Roca, Lydia Besnardeau, et al.

    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation

    Jean Francois Darrigrand, Mariana Valente, Pauline Martinez, et al.

    Selected by Giulia Boezio

    Mutations in the Insulator Protein Suppressor of Hairy Wing Induce Genome Instability

    Shih-Jui Hsu, Emily C. Stow, James R. Simmons, et al.

    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka


    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.

    Selected by Tim Fessenden


    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.

    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.

    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe

    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez