Kinetic sculpting of the seven stripes of the Drosophila even-skipped gene

Augusto Berrocal, Nicholas C Lammers, Hernan G Garcia, Michael B Eisen

Preprint posted on June 11, 2018

Falling into lines: @guberrocal, @HernanGGarcia and @mbeisen use live imaging and computational modelling to reveal the transcriptional dynamics underlying the emergence of the eve stripes in the Drosophila embryo

Selected by Erik Clark


Segmentation gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm has long been used as a test case for unravelling mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. Over the years, one of the most scrutinised genes has been even-skipped (eve), a pair-rule gene expressed in seven regular stripes. Although it was originally assumed that the regularity of these stripes must stem from an underlying uniformity of mechanism (e.g. Turing pattern formation), it was quickly discovered that the various eve stripes are actually established piecemeal, from 5 different “stripe-specific” enhancer elements. Today, these enhancers are among the best studied in the animal kingdom.

In recent years, the MS2-MCP system for live imaging has shone a light on the dynamicity of transcriptional regulation, again using Drosophila blastoderm genes such as eve as study cases. Transgenically inserting MS2 stem-loop repeats into a coding sequence causes maternally deposited and fluorescently tagged MCP protein to be concentrated at the gene locus during active transcription, allowing one to directly visualise transcriptional bursts in individual nuclei over time. However, in order to determine how exactly transcription is regulated across time and space to pattern developmental gene expression, it is first necessary to overcome the problem of inferring the promoter state history of each nucleus from its temporal intensity profile (an aggregate pattern which is determined by the cumulative number of nascent transcripts present at the transcribing locus over time).


Key Findings

Berroccal and colleagues constructed an eve MS2 reporter transgene, and collected 11 high-resolution movies of blastoderm eve expression, each focused on a different set of stripes. They segmented the movies to get the locations and intensity profiles of ~3,000 individual nuclei, then registered all this data together to produce an overall picture of eve transcription along the anteroposterior axis during and after stripe formation.

The authors then ran the intensity traces through a custom hidden Markov model to infer the history of transcriptional bursts in each nucleus (see the companion preprint in Related Research, below). A simple two-state (ON/OFF) modelling framework is commonly used to characterise transcriptional regulation at the promoter level, characterised by three parameters, which determine (1) average burst frequency, (2) average burst duration, and (3) the rate at which new transcripts are initialised during a burst. The authors found that eve transcription is regulated predominantly at the level of burst frequency (increasing it within stripes, and decreasing it between stripes), while the other two parameter values did not seem to change much. They also found that the different eve stripes are regulated similarly at the promoter level, even though they are generated by different enhancer elements and patterned by different sets of transcription factors.

Reassuringly, the tissue-level picture of eve expression yielded by the analysis was broadly in line with previous quantitative descriptions derived from large numbers of fixed samples. However, the authors were able to put more precise timings on the resolution of individual stripes, and more accurately determine the magnitude of the posterior to anterior shifts undertaken by the eve stripes after they form. Overall, this study underlines the extremely dynamic nature of eve expression within the blastoderm – as the authors stress, “at no point does eve approach anything even remotely like a steady state”.


Kymograph of eve transcription along the anteroposterior axis over time; from Figure 3B of the preprint



We are going to see many more MS2 movies in developmental biology over the coming years. This windfall of live imaging data will need to be analysed rigorously, perhaps using a similar framework to the one laid out here. This preprint therefore represents an important technical development. It also represents a laudable example of Open Science best practise: all datasets are well-documented and available in an online labbook, and Michael Eisen even wrote a great explainer thread for the project on Twitter:

Recently, Hernan Garcia and colleagues revealed a complementary live imaging technology (LlamaTags), which allows live imaging of transcription factors. This means that it is now possible to analyse both halves of the equation: we can characterise transcriptional dynamics at the single cell level, as seen in this preprint, but also relate these outputs to the changing concentrations of key regulatory proteins within these same cells. It seems that old friends like even-skipped will have much to teach us for many years to come.


Related Research

Lammers NC, Galstyan V, Reimer A, Medin SA, Wiggins CH, Garcia HG (2018) Binary transcriptional control of pattern formation in development. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/335919

Bothma JP, Norstad MR, Alamos S, Garcia HG (2018) LlamaTags: a versatile tool to image transcription factor dynamics in live embryos. Cell 173 1810-22

Bothma JP, Garcia HG, Esposito E, Schlissel G, Gregor T, Levine M (2014) Dynamic regulation of eve stripe 2 expression reveals transcriptional bursts in living Drosophila embryos. PNAS 111 10598-10603

Tags: drosophila, even-skipped, live-imaging, ms2, patterning, transcription

Posted on: 10th July 2018 , updated on: 11th July 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the biophysics category:

    Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.

    Jonathan B Michaux, Francois B Robin, William M McFadden, et al.

    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    Dynamics and interactions of ADP/ATP transporter AAC3 in DPC detergent are not functionally relevant

    Vilius Kurauskas, Audrey Hessel, François Dehez, et al.


    Major concerns with the integrity of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier in dodecyl-phosphocholine used for solution NMR studies

    Martin S. King, Paul G. Crichton, Jonathan J. Ruprecht, et al.

    Selected by Reid Alderson


    Mechanosensitive binding of p120-Catenin at cell junctions regulates E-Cadherin turnover and epithelial viscoelasticity

    K. Venkatesan Iyer, Romina Piscitello-Gómez, Frank Jülicher, et al.

    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Structural Basis of Tubulin Recruitment and Assembly by Tumor Overexpressed Gene (TOG) domain array Microtubule Polymerases

    Stanley Nithiananatham, Brian Cook, Fred Chang, et al.


    Roles for tubulin recruitment and self-organization by TOG domain arrays in Microtubule plus-end tracking and polymerase

    Brian Cook, Fred Chang, Ignacio Flor-Parra, et al.

    Selected by Ben Craske, Thibault Legal and Toni McHugh

    Clathrin plaques form mechanotransducing platforms

    Agathe Franck, Jeanne Laine, Gilles Moulay, et al.

    Selected by Amanda Haage

    Molecular dynamics simulations disclose early stages of the photo-activation of cryptochrome 4

    Daniel R. Kattnig, Claus Nielsen, Ilia A. Solov'yov

    Selected by Miriam Liedvogel


    Cellular Crowding Influences Extrusion and Proliferation to Facilitate Epithelial Tissue Repair

    Jovany Jeomar Franco, Youmna Maryline Atieh, Chase Dallas Bryan, et al.

    Selected by Helen Weavers

    Live-cell imaging of marked chromosome regions reveals dynamics of mitotic chromosome resolution and compaction

    John K Eykelenboom, Marek Gierlinski, Zuojun Yue, et al.


    Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

    Elisa Dultz, Roberta Mancini, Guido Polles, et al.

    Selected by Carmen Adriaens, Gautam Dey

    Tissue flow induces cell shape changes during organogenesis

    Gonca Erdemci-Tandogan, Madeline J.Clark, Jeffrey D. Amack, et al.

    Selected by Jacky G. Goetz

    Two contractile pools of actomyosin distinctly load and tune E-cadherin levels during morphogenesis

    Girish R. Kale, Xingbo Yang, Jean-Marc Philippe, et al.

    Selected by Arnaud Monnard

    Feedback control of neurogenesis by tissue packing

    Tom W. Hiscock, Joel B. Miesfeld, Kishore R. Mosaliganti, et al.

    Selected by Sarah Morson


    Tunable molecular tension sensors reveal extension-based control of vinculin loading

    Andrew S LaCroix, Andrew D Lynch, Matthew E Berginski, et al.

    Selected by Amanda Haage


    Also in the developmental biology category:

    millepattes micropeptides are an ancient developmental switch required for embryonic patterning

    Suparna Ray, Miriam I Rosenberg, Hélène Chanut-Delalande, et al.

    Selected by Erik Clark

    Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

    Kerstin Klinkert, Nicolas Levernier, Peter Gross, et al.


    Centrosome Aurora A gradient ensures a single PAR-2 polarity axis by regulating RhoGEF ECT-2 localization in C. elegans embryos

    Sachin Kotak, Sukriti Kapoor

    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.

    Selected by Coert Margadant

    SOL1 and SOL2 Regulate Fate Transition and Cell Divisions in the Arabidopsis Stomatal Lineage

    Abigail R Simmons, Kelli A Davies, Wanpeng Wang, et al.

    Selected by Martin Balcerowicz

    Analysis of the role of Nidogen/entactin in basement membrane assembly and morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Jianli Dai, Beatriz Estrada, Sofie Jacobs, et al.

    Selected by Nargess Khalilgharibi

    Neural crest cells regulate optic cup morphogenesis by promoting extracellular matrix assembly

    Chase Dallas Bryan, Rebecca Lynne Pfeiffer, Bryan William Jones, et al.

    Selected by Ashrifia Adomako-Ankomah


    Simultaneous production of diverse neuronal subtypes during early corticogenesis

    Elia Magrinelli, Robin Jan Wagener, Denis Jabaudon

    Selected by Boyan Bonev


    mRNA localisation in endothelial cells regulates blood vessel sprouting

    Guilherme Costa, Nawseen Tarannum, Shane Herbert

    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    LADL: Light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control

    Mayuri Rege, Ji Hun Kim, Jacqueline Valeri, et al.

    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis

    Cerys S Manning, Veronica Biga, James Boyd, et al.

    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila

    Selected by Clarice Hong


    Optogenetic dissection of mitotic spindle positioning in vivo

    Lars-Eric Fielmich, Ruben Schmidt, Daniel J Dickinson, et al.

    Selected by Angika Basant


    Excitable RhoA dynamics drive pulsed contractions in the early C. elegans embryo.

    Jonathan B Michaux, Francois B Robin, William M McFadden, et al.

    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    A transition from SoxB1 to SoxE transcription factors is essential for progression from pluripotent blastula cells to neural crest cells

    Elsy Buitrago-Delgado, Elizabeth Schock, Kara Nordin, et al.

    Selected by Amanda Haage

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.

    Selected by Gautam Dey


    Dynamic control of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1β and Tnf-α by macrophages is necessary for functional spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish

    Themistoklis M. Tsarouchas, Daniel Wehner, Leonardo Cavone, et al.

    Selected by Shikha Nayar