Menu

Close

Lineage recording reveals dynamics of cerebral organoid regionalization

Zhisong He, Tobias Gerber, Ashley Maynard, Akanksha Jain, Rebecca Petri, Malgorzata Santel, Kevin Ly, Leila Sidow, Fatima Sanchis Callejal, Stephan Riesenberg, J. Gray Camp, Barbara Treutlein

Preprint posted on June 20, 2020 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.19.162032v1

Cerebral Organoids: scRNAseq and spatial transcriptomics cast a powerful light on cell lineage dynamics and regionalisation

Selected by David Wilson, Irepan Salvador-Martinez

Background:

The mammalian brain is sufficiently accessible macroscopically that its truly phenomenal complexity and intricacy can come as quite a shock to those not au fais with neurobiology. How the cells that comprise such an organ self-organise and differentiate during development has long fascinated scientists. Cerebral organoids, are providing the clues to solve these questions by mimicking the development and function of the mammalian brain.

The challenge addressed here was to unveil the cell lineage dynamics that occur during cerebral organoid development as a proxy to in vivo brain regionalisation. It has been an ongoing problem to understand how regions are established during organoid development, how these regions self-organise and to what extent they recapitulate and are comparable to the mammalian brain. To do this, the authors developed an inducible lineage recording system that can be inserted in the genome using random transposition. Dubbed iTracer, this combines a highly complex barcoding library (11 random bases) with inducible CRISPR/Cas9 genetic scarring.

Genetic scarring involves the introduction of Cas9 protein, or the encoding mRNA, and a single-guide RNA directing Cas9 to GFP to cause a double-stranded break in the DNA of a single cell. The cell then must rapidly repair the break before subsequent cell divisions leading to mistakes, an insertion or deletion. The scars in the DNA are of random length and are unique to the GFP site. Daughter cells inherit the genetic scars during cell division and so cells originating from a common ancestor can be traced.

Leveraging the power and resolution of single cell transcriptomics to identify and read the genetic barcodes and scars, they reconstructed the lineage relationships and differentiation trajectories between cells during cerebral organoid development.

The represented Sleeping beauty vector used for lineage tracing is electroporated into Cas9 inducible iPSCs. Cells containing the reporter can be isolated by FACS before being propagated. Doxycycline induced scarring defines developmental timepoints with scRNAseq at the latter stages of development to assess cell specificity and regionalisation. He et al (2020) doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.19.162032: made available under a CC_BY_NC 4.0 International License.

 

Key Findings:

After testing in iPSCs for barcode complexity (81% of cells contained at least one barcode) and quantifying the number of insertions of the recorder with a transposon-based reporter (2.85 barcodes per cell), iTracer appeared to be suitable for lineage-coupled single-cell transcriptomics in iPSC-derived cells and tissues.

The authors wanted to use iTracer to identify lineage dynamics occurring in cells originating from a pluripotent state during cerebral organoid development. To test this lineage recording system in a developing organoid, organoids from ~2000 iTracer iPSC’s with five, scar induced, “developmental timepoints” (from day 4 to day 30) were sequenced at three single cell RNAseq “endpoints” (30, 45 and 60 days of culture).

Single cell RNA sequencing data from 12 organoids and two batches were integrated to identify 29 cell type clusters. Using marker genes and reference atlases the vast majority (90%) of cells could be annotated to CNS cell types.

Interestingly there seems to be a degree of reporter loss in the cells from this dataset with a variable number of fluorescent reporter cells, barcodes, and scars between organoids. Based on fluorescence, all starting iTracer cells contained the reporter, however reporter mRNA was only detected in about half (51%) of cells by the time of sequencing. The authors suggested transgene silencing and limitations of scRNAseq data as possible contributors to this loss. Importantly, in cells that contained the reporter at least one barcode was found in almost 75%.

The combination of iTracer barcoding and scar readouts with the resolution of scRNAseq facilitated the cell-type and brain region to be reconstructed and thus resolved into the lineage families of their original organoids and maternal iPSCs. Increased diversity in cell type was found within scar families that had been induced with Doxycycline at earlier timepoints. In one example, cells identified as having a cortical lineage could be separated from others at day 15. This suggests a patterning window may exist that defines regionalisation but the limited sampling of the whole organoid limits the conclusions that can be drawn from this at the moment.

To further improve the resolution achieved via iTracer/scRNAseq the authors micro-dissected cells from distinct parts (or regions) of organoids. This also raised the question as to how diverse spatially distant regions of the organoid are? Regions were found to be sufficiently distinct with iTracer identifying barcode and scar families showing transcriptionally divergent cell lineages.

The authors observed that barcode families accumulated differently in distinct regions of the organoids. Could these barcode enrichments be due to the spatial arrangements of the organoid? Using the 10x Visium platform, organoids were sectioned to identify transcriptome, barcode and scar topology. The 10x Visium platform facilitates classifying tissue based on total mRNA, this enables mapping the whole transcriptome with, crucially, morphological and spatial context. Remarkably, defined organoid regionalisation, could be resolved and assigned to equivalent telencephalon, diencephalon/mesencephalon, and rhombencephalon regions, as well as non-cerebral identities. The progressive combination of lineage-coupled single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identified distinct brain regions within organoids and that the cells within these regions have identifiable lineage compositions.

There are some caveats and limitations to iTracer addressed by the authors, in particular the lack of dynamic information that informs about the spatial restriction of lineages and how they expand throughout the developmental progression of the organoid and the loss of cellular specification. They speculated that this may be due to early spatial restriction of clones. To consider this the authors used live imaging with 4D lightsheet microscopy to directly track lineages of single nuclei. This revealed that during the initial growth of the organoid cells have very restricted cell migration thus leading to cell lineages with limited spatial positioning; the initial growth is then followed by brain patterning and cell fate commitment to achieve the identified homologous brain regions.

Authors illustration showing the proliferation and regionalisation of tracked lineages in the organoid over 100 hours. He et al (2020) doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.19.162032: made available under a CC_BY_NC 4.0 International License.

 

What I like about this preprint:

The progressive and imaginative combination of using lineage tracing in 3D cultured cells with the cutting-edge power and resolution of scRNAseq and spatial transcriptomics to begin to tease out the complexities cerebral organoid development highlights further the potential of organoids in exploring exceedingly complex developmental systems.

 

Open Questions:

  • Have you considered any specific applications in other organoid model systems or in investigating tumour evolution?
  • Did you experience any issues with the fragility of the neuronal cells, and did you consider single nuclei RNA sequencing rather than whole cell?
  • Can micro-dissected cells be independently cultured to isolate regions for specific analysis or modelling, do they retain their specificity and/or is this in part determined by their cellular neighbours within the organoid?
  • In iTracer, most of the lineage information comes from the random barcode which provides information about the clones formed from the initial iPSCs. How would you improve iTracer in order to increase the resolution of interclonal relationship reconstruction?

 

Posted on: 10th July 2020

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.22839

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    Society for Developmental Biology 79th Annual Meeting

    Preprints at SDB 2020

     



    List by Irepan Salvador-Martinez, Martin Estermann

    FENS 2020

    A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020

     



    List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

    Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

    This preList contains preprints about the latest findings on Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) in various model organisms at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.

     



    List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

    Cell Polarity

    Recent research from the field of cell polarity is summarized in this list of preprints. It comprises of studies focusing on various forms of cell polarity ranging from epithelial polarity, planar cell polarity to front-to-rear polarity.

     



    List by Yamini Ravichandran

    TAGC 2020

    Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20

     



    List by Maiko Kitaoka, Madhuja Samaddar, Miguel V. Almeida, Sejal Davla, Jennifer Ann Black, Gautam Dey

    3D Gastruloids

    A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells)

     



    List by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

    A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

     



    List by Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka

    EDBC Alicante 2019

    Preprints presented at the European Developmental Biology Congress (EDBC) in Alicante, October 23-26 2019.

     



    List by Sergio Menchero, Jesus Victorino, Teresa Rayon, Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

    Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019

     



    List by Gautam Dey

    SDB 78th Annual Meeting 2019

    A curation of the preprints presented at the SDB meeting in Boston, July 26-30 2019. The preList will be updated throughout the duration of the meeting.

     



    List by Alex Eve

    Lung Disease and Regeneration

    This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.

     



    List by Rob Hynds

    Young Embryologist Network Conference 2019

    Preprints presented at the Young Embryologist Network 2019 conference, 13 May, The Francis Crick Institute, London

     



    List by Alex Eve

    Pattern formation during development

    The aim of this preList is to integrate results about the mechanisms that govern patterning during development, from genes implicated in the processes to theoritical models of pattern formation in nature.

     



    List by Alexa Sadier

    BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

    Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

     



    List by Gautam Dey

    Zebrafish immunology

    A compilation of cutting-edge research that uses the zebrafish as a model system to elucidate novel immunological mechanisms in health and disease.

     



    List by Shikha Nayar
    Close