Temporal Control of Transcription by Zelda in living Drosophila embryos
Preprint posted on March 14, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/03/14/282426
In this preprint, the Lagha lab studies the role of pioneer transcription factors on the temporal control gene expression. Pioneer factors are known for their ability to bind their sites when the chromatin is closed. However, how pioneer factors prime enhancers to control the time of gene activation, and how this priming affects gene expression after mitosis, remains elusive. In the Drosophila embryo, the maternally provided Zelda pioneer factor is responsible for the awakening of the zygotic genome. In this preprint, the authors examine the enhancer expression dynamics of a Zelda responsive element, and the dynamic properties of Zelda in living Drosophila embryos, through two cycles of cell division. In particular, they measure the temporal coordination in Zelda activation through a synthetic regulatory element. The authors also test how the initial state of activity of the enhancer (memory) impacts on gene activation. By examining Zelda dynamics in living embryos during mitosis, they find that Zelda accelerates transcription and fosters synchrony but is not the basis for transcriptional mitotic memory.
Why I chose the paper:
How gene regulation is precisely temporally controlled is one of the most interesting questions in developmental biology. One way to understand what’s going on is to characterize and study the dynamic activity of enhancers, and we need to find new ways to study how enhancers regulate gene expression.
This preprint offers a novel way to interpret enhancer dynamics through cell division and study transcriptional regulation by enhancers. The authors had previously shown how cells with memory activate transcription twice as fast as those with inactive mothers (1), but this time they focus on the role of Zelda in temporal coordination. I really like the fact that the authors are able to reproduce the activation kinetics of the endogenous shadow enhancer with their synthetic version that contains two Zelda binding sites. In addition, they implement an automated segmentation and tracking system that allows them to study hundreds of nuclei during multiple cell divisions. This system, once implemented, can save hours of tedious manual tracking, and provides a huge number of nuclei to analyse quantitatively. With this data, the authors move on to design a mathematical model to learn how memory could work. They model the time of reactivation after mitosis of cells with or without memory and find that inactive cells require at least three transitions to become active. The fitting to the model also shows that memory may be potentiated by reducing the number of steps required for post-mitotic transcriptional activation; something that couldn’t have been proposed without the model.
Unexpectedly, they find that Zelda does not play a role in setting the memory, since reducing Zelda levels leads to a reduction in activation kinetics but memory is still present. Neither does Zelda function as a mitotic bookmarking protein, since it is not retained on the chromosomes during mitosis. To pin down Zelda’s mode of action, the authors go one step further and perform fluorescent recovery after photo-bleaching and fluorescent correlation spectroscopy experiments. This thorough analysis of Zelda kinetic properties demonstrates that Zelda is highly dynamic and binds transiently to chromatin. The preprint concludes that Zelda accelerates the various transitions required prior to transcriptional activation.
How this work moves the field forward:
Regulatory sequences contain multiple transcription factor binding sites that are responsible for the spatio-temporal expression patterns of genes. We have long tried to decode the map to predict how the number, affinity and arrangement of sites determines transcription. This gets even more complicated if we consider that a single gene can respond to multiple enhancers, and these can exhibit overlapping spatiotemporal activity. This preprint advances our understanding of how enhancers coordinate gene expression, and emphasises how quantitative measurements coupled with mathematical modelling could provide precise and accurate models for transcription.
- Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo. Ferraro T, Esposito E, Mancini L, Ng S, Lucas T, Coppey M, Dostatni N, Walczak AM, Levine M, Lagha M. Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 25;26(2):212-8.
- Transcriptional precision and accuracy in development: from measurements to models and mechanisms. Bentovim L, Harden TT, DePace AH. Development. 2017 Nov 1;144(21):3855-3866.
Questions to the authors:
- In the model, there are two possible parameters that define the memory function, (1) the number of transitions between discrete transcriptional states and (2) the duration of each transition. Have the authors considered to describe/identify the three transitions and/or metastable states, and explore parameter ‘a’ further?
- I wonder if the authors could clarify further how the model supports their finding that the increase number of binding sites has an effect on the durations of the transitions and not on the number of states.
Posted on: 9th April 2018Read preprint
Also in the developmental biology category:
The cell wall regulates dynamics and size of plasma-membrane nanodomains in Arabidopsis.
|Selected by||Marc Somssich|
Psychiatric risk gene NT5C2 regulates protein translation in human neural progenitor cells
|Selected by||Joanna Cross|
A Scube2-Shh feedback loop links morphogen release to morphogen signaling to enable scale invariant patterning of the ventral neural tube
|Selected by||Teresa Rayon|
Epiblast formation by Tead-Yap-dependent expression of pluripotency factors and competitive elimination of unspecified cells
|Selected by||Sarah Bowling, Teresa Rayon|
Single cell transcriptomics reveals spatial and temporal dynamics of gene expression in the developing mouse spinal cord
|Selected by||Reena Lasrado|
The Toll pathway inhibits tissue growth and regulates cell fitness in an infection-dependent manner
|Selected by||Rohan Khadilkar|
Rapid embryonic cell cycles defer the establishment of heterochromatin by Eggless/SetDB1 in Drosophila
|Selected by||Gabriel Aughey|
A histidine kinase gene is required for large radius root tip circumnutation and surface exploration in rice
|Selected by||Martin Balcerowicz|
Actomyosin-driven tension at compartmental boundaries orients cell division independently of cell geometry in vivo
|Selected by||Ivana Viktorinová|
Molecular organization of integrin-based adhesion complexes in mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
Superresolution architecture of pluripotency guarding adhesions
|Selected by||Nicola Stevenson, Amanda Haage|
Transcriptional initiation and mechanically driven self-propagation of a tissue contractile wave during axis elongation
|Selected by||Sundar Naganathan|
Revealing the nanoscale morphology of the primary cilium using super-resolution fluorescence microscopy
|Selected by||Gautam Dey|
Signaling dynamics control cell fate in the early Drosophila embryo
|Selected by||Yara E. Sánchez Corrales|
Three-dimensional tissue stiffness mapping in the mouse embryo supports durotaxis during early limb bud morphogenesis
|Selected by||Natalie Dye|
PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice
|Selected by||Carmen Adriaens|
Synergy with TGFβ ligands switches WNT pathway dynamics from transient to sustained during human pluripotent cell differentiation
|Selected by||Pierre Osteil|