Close

The Spatial Scale of Synaptic Protein Allocation during Homeostatic Plasticity

Chao Sun, Andreas Nold, Tatjana Tchumatchenko, Mike Heilemann, Erin M. Schuman

Preprint posted on 30 April 2020 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.29.068833v1

Article now published in Science Advances at http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0790

Think global, allocate local? Synaptic protein allocation during homeostatic synaptic scaling depends on synaptic neighborhood

Selected by Julia Bleier

Background and Approach:

Neurons can form thousands of synaptic connections, each with unique synaptic strengths, which allow individual neurons and neuronal networks to perform meaningful computations. A common way of assessing the strength of all of the individual synapses which send inputs to a given neuron is to record the quantal amplitude of postsynaptic currents resulting from the spontaneous release of presynaptic vesicles. When neurons are challenged with manipulations that increase or decrease their activity, they respond by scaling these quantal amplitudes in the reverse direction, effectively homeostatically adjusting their inputs to stabilize their output (4). The insertion and removal of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) type ionotropic glutamate receptor in the postsynaptic density has previously been found to mediate this multiplicative up-scaling and down-scaling respectively (5).

Intuitively, it makes sense that each synapse would multiplicatively increase or decrease in strength in order to preserve both global output and local distinctions in relative synaptic strength. However, electrophysiological measurements of synaptic strength lack the spatial resolution to distinguish between changes in individual synapses. The authors seek to understand how local differences in strength are preserved while global synaptic strength is scaled up or down. Specifically, they work towards deciphering the rules which govern the delivery of newly synthesized proteins to individual and groups of synapses.

Their approach for addressing this gap in knowledge is to look at the spatial distribution of nascent proteins in cultured rat hippocampal neurons following the induction of homeostatic synaptic upscaling. Specifically, they examined nascent proteins in 15-minute periods following 1 or 24 hours of incubation with the sodium channel blocker, TTX. To label nascent proteins they combined BONCAT metabolic labeling (1), which tags nascent proteins with the noncanonical amino acid Azidohomoaline (AHA), with DNA-PAINT using copper-free click chemistry (2, 3). In order to computationally isolate the nascent proteins specifically in postsynaptic densities of excitatory synapses, they additionally immunolabeled MAP2 and PSD-95. This allowed the authors to address both global increases in protein levels at the level of dendrites as well as the scale of spatial variation they find in protein allocation.

Key Findings:

The authors find that synaptic scaling resulted in a global increase in nascent protein levels after both 1 hour and 24 hours of TTX, at which time the physiological effects of scaling are reliably apparent. At both time points, the absolute amount of nascent protein detected in postsynapses and dendritic shafts increased compared to untreated cells. However, the synaptic fraction was significantly higher only after 1 hour, suggesting that synthesis of proteins right at the postsynaptic density is most critical just after activity loss.

The authors found a high degree of heterogeneity in the distribution of nascent proteins, a somewhat unexpected result, given the global nature of homeostatic scaling. Although proteins within a dendritic branch linearly correlated with branch length and synapse number, individual synapses received variable shares of the total amount of nascent proteins within a dendrite which was only weakly correlated with PSD-95 area defined synaptic size. Instead, examination of turning points in a heat-map of synaptic protein density revealed neighborhoods of synapses seemed to scale together based on the number of synapses within the neighborhood. Within each neighborhood, neighboring synapses displayed heterogenous allocation of nascent proteins. The authors suggest that the scale of the synaptic neighborhoods between which protein is differentially allocated may reflect the size of intracellular organelles such as mitochondria.

Why I selected this preprint:

The authors apply the unique, innovative techniques in which their lab has expertise to make progress on an important biological question which had previously not been possible to answer. It is written very clearly and uses highly specialized molecular biochemistry and computational techniques but understanding them in great detail is not necessary for understanding the results. It opens up a whole new set of exciting questions, some of which I have outlined below.

Questions for authors and open questions for future study:

  1. What fraction of the nascent protein which is measured is expected to be postsynaptic vs. presynaptic? Is it possible to separate pre and postsynaptic nascent proteins, and if so, would this explain some of the variability in protein allocation between adjacent synapses with different presynaptic partners?
  2. Is it possible to measure specific nascent proteins with a modified version of this technique (proximity-dependent DNA PAINT)? It would be very valuable to look at specific increases in AMPA receptors and other proteins which have already been associated with synaptic upscaling.
  3. How much diffusion or dendritic transport occurs during the 15 minute AHA labeling period? Is protein likely to be translated at individual synaptic sites or within the larger synaptic neighborhood and then distributed between synapses?
  4. What drives the development of these synaptic neighborhoods to which different amounts of nascent protein is allocated? Is it dendritic organelles as the authors predict, or calcium signaling microdomains, or something else entirely?
  5. Although measured at 1 hour and 24 hours, the labeling period is only 15 minutes in each case. I understand that this the authors 30 minute labeling was not practical due to merging of signal clusters. Could multicolor or frequency multiplexed DNA-PAINT be applied to circumvent this problem? It would be very interesting to see whether protein allocation was consistent between different 15 minute periods, across neighborhoods and synapses.
  6. What is the functional significance of the heterogeneity in quantity of nascent proteins at different synapses? Does the amount of protein synthesized at various points during upscaling correlate with functional measurements of basal and/or new synaptic strength?

 

 

 

References:

  1. C. Dieterich, J. J. L. Hodas, G. Gouzer, I. Y. Shadrin, J. T. Ngo, A. Triller, D. A. Tirrell, E. M. Schuman, In situ visualization and dynamics of newly synthesized proteins in rat hippocampal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 13, 897–905 (2010).
  2. C. Jewett, E. M. Sletten, C. R. Bertozzi, Rapid Cu-Free Click Chemistry with Readily Synthesized Biarylazacyclooctynones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3688–3690 (2010).
  3. Schnitzbauer, M. T. Strauss, T. Schlichthaerle, F. Schueder, R. Jungmann, Superresolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT. Nat Protoc. 12, 1198–1228 (2017).
  4. G. Turrigiano, The Self-Tuning Neuron: Synaptic Scaling of Excitatory Synapses. Cell. 15 135, 422–435 (2008).
  5. J. Wierenga (2005). Postsynaptic Expression of Homeostatic Plasticity at Neocortical Synapses. Journal of Neuroscience 25, 2895–2905.

 

Tags: homeostatic plasticity, plasticity, protein synthesis, synaptic scaling

Posted on: 1 June 2020 , updated on: 2 June 2020

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.21326

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

Author's response

Chao Sun shared

We appreciated your interest in our research. And we have thought about your questions carefully. Please see below:

1) What fraction of the nascent protein which is measured is expected to be postsynaptic vs. presynaptic? Is it possible to separate pre and postsynaptic nascent proteins, and if so, would this explain some of the variability in protein allocation between adjacent synapses with different presynaptic partners?

Interesting question. We don’t know what fraction of the nascent protein we measured is pre- vs. post- synaptic.  A recent paper from our group (Hafner, Donlin-Asp et al., 2019) used a different metabolic labeling strategy and found evidence for abundant protein-synthesis capacity in axon terminals using expansion microscopy. In our experiments, some of the nascent protein that we ascribed to synapses could arise from presynaptic sources.

 

2) Is it possible to measure specific nascent proteins with a modified version of this technique (proximity-dependent DNA PAINT)? It would be very valuable to look at specific increases in AMPA receptors and other proteins which have already been associated with synaptic upscaling.

‘Proximity-dependent DNA PAINT’ is an active area of research in our lab. And we have already seen promising results in our method development. We hope to bring this technique to the community soon and enable everyone to investigate their favorite proteins.

 

3) How much diffusion or dendritic transport occurs during the 15 minute AHA labeling period? Is protein likely to be translated at individual synaptic sites or within the larger synaptic neighborhood and then distributed between synapses?

 Based on our estimates (Fonkeu et al 2019), the nascent proteins would not have much time to diffuse far from its source in our study— on the scale of synaptic neighborhoods (within ~ 10 microns). Hence a combination of on-site synthesis and within-neighborhood distribution could co-exist.

 

4) What drives the development of these synaptic neighborhoods to which different amounts of nascent protein is allocated? Is it dendritic organelles as the authors predict, or calcium signaling microdomains, or something else entirely?

We are actively investigating potential factors that bring neighboring synapses together for resource allocation. Indeed, protein-synthesis machinery and signaling are our main suspects. Alternatively, as you mentioned, local calcium domains, evident in Ca2+ imaging studies, could also contribute.

 

5) Although measured at 1 hour and 24 hours, the labeling period is only 15 minutes in each case. I understand that 30 minute labeling was not practical due to merging of signal clusters. Could multicolor or frequency multiplexed DNA-PAINT be applied to circumvent this problem? It would be very interesting to see whether protein allocation was consistent between different 15 minute periods, across neighborhoods and synapses.

 The multiplexing of nascent protein labeling and localization would be interesting to try. We would love to develop such a tool.

 

6) What is the functional significance of the heterogeneity in quantity of nascent proteins at different synapses? Does the amount of protein synthesized at various points during upscaling correlate with functional measurements of basal and/or new synaptic strength?

As you know, the synapses of a neuron exhibit heterogeneity in their efficacy, molecular composition, resource allocation, and other things. The functional significance of this heterogeneity is not understood. One idea worth pursuing is that there are correlations between synaptic activity and synaptic protein allocation.

Have your say

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here

preLists in the biochemistry category:

Preprint Peer Review – Biochemistry Course at UFRJ, Brazil

Communication of scientific knowledge has changed dramatically in recent decades and the public perception of scientific discoveries depends on the peer review process of articles published in scientific journals. Preprints are key vehicles for the dissemination of scientific discoveries, but they are still not properly recognized by the scientific community since peer review is very limited. On the other hand, peer review is very heterogeneous and a fundamental aspect to improve it is to train young scientists on how to think critically and how to evaluate scientific knowledge in a professional way. Thus, this course aims to: i) train students on how to perform peer review of scientific manuscripts in a professional manner; ii) develop students' critical thinking; iii) contribute to the appreciation of preprints as important vehicles for the dissemination of scientific knowledge without restrictions; iv) contribute to the development of students' curricula, as their opinions will be published and indexed on the preLights platform. The evaluations will be based on qualitative analyses of the oral presentations of preprints in the field of biochemistry deposited in the bioRxiv server, of the critical reports written by the students, as well as of the participation of the students during the preprints discussions.

 



List by Marcus Oliveira

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

This preLists features preprints that were discussed and presented during the CellBio 2022 meeting in Washington, DC in December 2022.

 



List by Nadja Hümpfer et al.

20th “Genetics Workshops in Hungary”, Szeged (25th, September)

In this annual conference, Hungarian geneticists, biochemists and biotechnologists presented their works. Link: http://group.szbk.u-szeged.hu/minikonf/archive/prg2021.pdf

 



List by Nándor Lipták

Fibroblasts

The advances in fibroblast biology preList explores the recent discoveries and preprints of the fibroblast world. Get ready to immerse yourself with this list created for fibroblasts aficionados and lovers, and beyond. Here, my goal is to include preprints of fibroblast biology, heterogeneity, fate, extracellular matrix, behavior, topography, single-cell atlases, spatial transcriptomics, and their matrix!

 



List by Osvaldo Contreras

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

 



List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019

 



List by Dey Lab

Cellular metabolism

A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.

 



List by Pablo Ranea Robles

MitoList

This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.

 



List by Sandra Franco Iborra

Also in the molecular biology category:

‘In preprints’ from Development 2022-2023

A list of the preprints featured in Development's 'In preprints' articles between 2022-2023

 



List by Alex Eve, Katherine Brown

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Preprints mentioned by speakers at the #CSHLsymp23

 



List by Alex Eve

9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination

This preList contains preprints discussed during the 9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination. This conference was held in Kona, Hawaii from April 17th to 21st 2023.

 



List by Martin Estermann

Alumni picks – preLights 5th Birthday

This preList contains preprints that were picked and highlighted by preLights Alumni - an initiative that was set up to mark preLights 5th birthday. More entries will follow throughout February and March 2023.

 



List by Sergio Menchero et al.

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

This preLists features preprints that were discussed and presented during the CellBio 2022 meeting in Washington, DC in December 2022.

 



List by Nadja Hümpfer et al.

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

A list of preprints mentioned at the #EESmorphoG virtual meeting in 2021.

 



List by Alex Eve

FENS 2020

A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020

 



List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome

 



List by Hiral Shah

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

 



List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

Lung Disease and Regeneration

This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.

 



List by Rob Hynds

Also in the neuroscience category:

‘In preprints’ from Development 2022-2023

A list of the preprints featured in Development's 'In preprints' articles between 2022-2023

 



List by Alex Eve, Katherine Brown

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Preprints mentioned by speakers at the #CSHLsymp23

 



List by Alex Eve

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

This preList highlights the preprints discussed at the JCS meeting 'Imaging Cell Dynamics'. The meeting was held from 14 - 17 May 2023 in Lisbon, Portugal and was organised by Erika Holzbaur, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Rob Parton and Michael Way.

 



List by Helen Zenner

FENS 2020

A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020

 



List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

 



List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

SDB 78th Annual Meeting 2019

A curation of the preprints presented at the SDB meeting in Boston, July 26-30 2019. The preList will be updated throughout the duration of the meeting.

 



List by Alex Eve

Autophagy

Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.

 



List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

Young Embryologist Network Conference 2019

Preprints presented at the Young Embryologist Network 2019 conference, 13 May, The Francis Crick Institute, London

 



List by Alex Eve
Close