Creating Clear and Informative Image-based Figures for Scientific Publications
Preprint posted on October 08, 2020 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.08.327718v1
Categories: cell biology, ecology, physiology, plant biology
Background
Images are often used to share scientific data, providing the visual evidence needed to turn concepts and hypotheses into observable findings. While many resources exist regarding guidelines on fraudulent image manipulation and technical requirements for image acquisition and publishing, data examining the quality of reporting and ease of interpretation for image-based figures are scarce.Moreover, recent evidence suggests that important methodological details about image acquisition are often missing. Although general recommendations emphasize that authors should design figures for their audience rather than themselves, and that figures should be self-explanatory, figures are often difficult to interpret, and therefore represent a problem for accessibility and importantly, for reproducibility. In their work, Jambor et al (1) (as part of the eLife Ambassadors program of 2018 and 2019) examined the quality of reporting and accessibility of image-based figures among papers published in top journals in plant sciences, cell biology and physiology. Based on their results, they provide targeted recommendations about how informative image-based figures can be created in a manner that makes them both accessible and reproducible.

Key findings and developments
Findings regarding image-related information across three fields: plant science, physiology and cell biology.
The authors focused on papers from the top 15 journals within three large research fields, namely plant sciences, cell biology and physiology. These were the key findings:
- Scale bars: 50% of papers approximately, had complete scale bars for each image provided, while the remaining 30% and 20% had incomplete or fully missing information, respectively.
- Insets: The majority of papers in all three fields clearly and accurately marked the location of all insets, however, one-fifth of papers appeared to have marked the location of at least one inset incorrectly, while in approximately one-fifth, clear inset markings were missing for some or all insets.
- Accessibility to readers with colour blindness: Although papers without any colorblind accessible figures were uncommon, almost half of cell biology papers and 1/4th of physiology and plant science papers contained some images that were inaccessible to readers with deuteranopia. Further, up to a third of papers contained color annotations that were not visible to someone with deuteranopia.
- Figure legends: The majority of physiology and cell biology papers provided a full description of the objects shown in the figure. About half of the papers also failed to adequately explain insets. About 66% of all papers clearly stated the meaning of all image labels, and the vast majority explained what each colour represented.
- Based on all criteria defined in this study, the authors found that only 16% of physiology papers, 12% of cell biology papers, and 2% of plant science papers, met the criteria for all image-based figures in any given paper.
Based on the above findings, the authors provide a set of recommendations for creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications.
Recommendations for creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications.
- Choose a scale or magnification that fits the research question. Namely, that it allows to see the features described and needed to answer the question- be this anywhere in the range between whole body level and sub-cellular level. When both low and high magnifications are necessary for one image, insets should be used to show a small portion of the image at higher magnification, and the inset location should be accurately marked in the low magnification image. Also, insets should be explained in the figure legends.
- Include a clearly labeled scale bar. The authors offer various suggestions of what a clearly labeled scale bar should include: every image type should have a scale bar; these scale bars and labels should be clearly visible; the dimensions should be stated with the scale bar.
- Use colours wisely. In a scientific context, adapting colours is possible and may enhance readers’ understanding. In many instances, scientists can choose between displaying greyscale or colour images. Greyscale is often used to display fine details, or when visibility is compromised.
- Choose a colourblind accessible colour palette. Colourblind-safe colour palettes for fluorescence and other images should be used – there are programs simulating how a specific combination of colours would look to readers with deuteranopia (who cannot distinguish red and green), and tritanopia (who cannot distinguish green and blue). The authors recommend the use of free tools for this, such as Color Oracle. The authors suggest that cyan and magenta, or green and magenta are combinations visible to readers with normal vision, deuteranopia and tritanopia. In addition to choosing an adequate colour palette, information can be displayed in separate channels in addition to the merged image. Individual channels may be shown in greyscale to make it easier for readers to perceive fine details.
- Figure design. In multi-pannel figures, careful planning is needed to convey a clear message, while ensuring that all panels fit together and follow a logical order. The authors provide in their work a planning table to help with figure design. They highlight as an important aspect, the direction of information depending on their array of columns/rows, and how readers approach this information (i.e. top to bottom/left to right). The authors suggest QuickFigures as a tool that helps create multipanel figures for microscopy-based images.
- Figure annotation. The image should have the right amount of annotations, without it being too little, too abstract, or too long such that it covers the image and/or results in a label difficult to interpret. In such case, explanations of the labels should be placed in the figure legend. Additionally, abbreviations should be used cautiously, and should be explained in the figure legend even if they are defined within the manuscript. Also, colours and stains should be explained enough to allow readers unfamiliar with the stain to interpret the image. Finally, ensure that the annotations (in addition to the figures) are accessible to colour-blind readers.
- Prepare figure legends. Important information needed to interpret the images should be present in the legend. This includes species and tissue type/object shown in the figure, explanations of all labels, annotations and colours, and markings/legend entries denoting insets. Moreover, relevant details not marked in the figure should be explained in the legend.
What I like about this preprint
I think this work is extremely useful as a very complete guideline to all researchers in various areas beyond the three chosen in this study. I think indeed, following these recommendations carefully will improve a lot the readability and reproducibility of imaging-based work. In my experience, imaging-based labs are familiar with the vast majority of these recommendations. I think having these recommendations is a good baseline for all labs (including those whose expertise is not imaging) to standardize figure generation when it comes to inclusion of images. Moreover, the work touches on the rationale for each of the recommendations they give.
References
- Jambor et al, Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications, bioRxiv, 2020.
Posted on: 8th December 2020
doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.26207
Read preprintSign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts
Register hereAlso in the cell biology category:
Also in the ecology category:
Bacteriological and histopathological findings in cetaceans that stranded in the Philippines from 2017 to 2018
Selected by | Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello |
2
Are indigenous territories and community-managed areas effective natural climate solutions? A neotropical analysis using matching methods and geographic discontinuity designs.
Selected by | Sophia Friesen |
1
Intraspecific variation in thermal tolerance differs between tropical and temperate fishes
Selected by | Charlotte Nelson |
Also in the physiology category:
Dissecting Mammalian Spermatogenesis Using Spatial Transcriptomics
Selected by | Martin Estermann |
Sick Bats Stay Home Alone: Social distancing during the acute phase response in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus)
Selected by | Baheerathan Murugavel |
Creating Clear and Informative Image-based Figures for Scientific Publications
Selected by | Mariana De Niz |
1
Also in the plant biology category:
Major components in the KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2-ligand signaling pathway are conserved in the liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha
AND
The Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens PpKAI2L receptors for strigolactones and related compounds highlight MAX2 dependent and independent pathways
Selected by | Facundo Romani |
Hydration-dependent phase separation of a prion-like protein regulates seed germination during water stress
Selected by | Martin Balcerowicz |
NO GAMETOPHORES 2 is a novel regulator of the 2D to 3D growth transition in the moss Physcomitrium patens
Selected by | Facundo Romani |
1
preListscell biology category:
in theFENS 2020
A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020
List by | Ana Dorrego-Rivas |
Planar Cell Polarity – PCP
This preList contains preprints about the latest findings on Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) in various model organisms at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.
List by | Ana Dorrego-Rivas |
BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite
[under construction] Preprints presented at the (fully virtual) EMBL BioMalPar XVI, 17-18 May 2020 #emblmalaria
List by | Dey Lab, Samantha Seah |
1
Cell Polarity
Recent research from the field of cell polarity is summarized in this list of preprints. It comprises of studies focusing on various forms of cell polarity ranging from epithelial polarity, planar cell polarity to front-to-rear polarity.
List by | Yamini Ravichandran |
TAGC 2020
Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20
List by | Maiko Kitaoka, Madhuja Samaddar, Miguel V. Almeida, Sejal Davla, Jennifer Ann Black, Dey Lab |
3D Gastruloids
A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells). Preprint missing? Don't hesitate to let us know.
List by | Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello |
ECFG15 – Fungal biology
Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome
List by | Hiral Shah |
ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019
A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)
List by | Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka |
EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life
Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019
List by | Dey Lab |
Autophagy
Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.
List by | Sandra Malmgren Hill |
Lung Disease and Regeneration
This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.
List by | Rob Hynds |
Cellular metabolism
A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.
List by | Pablo Ranea Robles |
BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
List by | Dey Lab |
MitoList
This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.
List by | Sandra Franco Iborra |
Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019
Few of the preprints that were discussed in the recent BPS annual meeting at Baltimore, USA
List by | Joseph Jose Thottacherry |
ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018
This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.
List by | Dey Lab, Amanda Haage |
Also in the ecology category:
Festival of Ecology! 14th to 18th December 2020 #BES2020
A list of preprints dealing with the talks/posters presented in the Festival of Ecology virtual conference held in December 2020
List by | Baheerathan Murugavel |
Bats
A list of preprints dealing with the ecology, evolution and behavior of bats
List by | Baheerathan Murugavel |
Also in the physiology category:
FENS 2020
A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020
List by | Ana Dorrego-Rivas |
TAGC 2020
Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20
List by | Maiko Kitaoka, Madhuja Samaddar, Miguel V. Almeida, Sejal Davla, Jennifer Ann Black, Dey Lab |
Autophagy
Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.
List by | Sandra Malmgren Hill |
Cellular metabolism
A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.
List by | Pablo Ranea Robles |