High-content Imaging-based Pooled CRISPR Screens in Mammalian Cells

Xiaowei Yan, Nico Stuurman, Susana A. Ribeiro, Marvin E. Tanenbaum, Max A. Horlbeck, Christina R. Liem, Marco Jost, Jonathan S. Weissman, Ronald D. Vale

Preprint posted on July 01, 2020


Image-based pooled whole genome CRISPR screening for Parkin and TFEB subcellular localization

Gil Kanfer, Shireen A. Sarraf, Yaakov Maman, Heather Baldwin, Kory R. Johnson, Michael E. Ward, Martin Kampmann, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Richard J. Youle

Preprint posted on July 02, 2020

Optical enrichment & AI-PS: broadening the phenotypes accessible to pooled CRISPR screens

Selected by Kirsty Ferguson


CRISPR/Cas9 has revolutionised our ability to functionally annotate the human genome. Transfecting cells with pooled libraries of single gRNAs provides a powerful tool to assess the genotype-phenotype relationship on a large-scale. However, this process is limited by our ability to select and enrich the phenotype of interest in a high-throughput manner. Many phenotypes are visible only by microscopic evaluation. Previous studies have expanded the scope for microscopy-based screens, however they have intrinsic technical limits in scalability (1-6). The authors of these preprints develop automated approaches to facilitate fast and scalable imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens.

Key findings

Phenotypes are traditionally selected in CRISPR screens through viability, growth rates, chemical selection or FACS sorting. In order to enrich cells based on a morphological feature, the phenotype must be associated with a selectable readout. The ‘optical enrichment’ process presented in these preprints relies on the ability to mark cells displaying a CRISPR-induced phenotype by photo-conversion.

(A) Yan et al

Prior to transfection with the pooled sgRNA library, an immortalised retinal pigment epithelial cell line was engineered to express a photo-activatable form of the fluorescent protein mCherry via lentiviral infection. Cells with the phenotype of interest, as observed by microscopy, were identified by automated image analysis and photo-converted into mCherry positive cells by exposure to blue light. This was achieved using a digital micromirror device (DMD), a device that can be introduced into the light path of common commercial microscopes. This process was automated by developing a plugin called Auto-PhotoConverter for the open source microscope control software μManager. The specificity of photo-conversion was tested using a pool of cells positive and negative for the fluorescent protein mIFP – this found photo-conversion to be reliably specific, irrespective of the percentage of ‘hits’ or cells marked for photo-activation.

The photo-activated, mCherry positive cells could then be selected by FACS. By varying the photo-conversion time, the authors also found that cells with different phenotypes could be marked with different mCherry intensities, and as such, isolated into different groups. Traditionally, high-throughput sequencing would be used to examine the sgRNA abundance relative to the whole cell population. However, the authors were able to mark and isolate ‘true negative’ cells (absent of both mCherry and mIFP expression) using a different photo-conversion time. Comparison of sgRNA enrichment to this population improved the identification of the ‘true positive’ phenotype. This optimised method was used to screen a pool of over 6000 sgRNAs targeting over 500 genes for their effects on nuclear size, with ~1.5 million individual cells able to be screened in 8 hours. 14/15 of the identified hits were further validated to exhibit larger nuclei after knock down.

Schematic of Optical Enrichment imaging-based pooled CRISPR screen. Figure 1a of this preprint made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.

(B) Kanfer et al

In this preprint, Kafner et al present a complementary method – Artificial Intelligence-Photoswitchable Screening (AI-PS) – to identify subcellular image phenotypes in pooled genetic screens. Similarly to Yan et al, this method involves labelling phenotypically selected cells by photo-activation of a fluorescent protein, subsequent FACS sorting and sgRNA sequencing. However, the methods differ in their initial identification of cells for photo-conversion; the AI-PS platform implements machine learning and deep learning algorithms to perform image capture, segmentation, selection based on a pre-trained classification model and photo-activation of regions of interest. This enables screening of ~ one million cells within 12 hours. Proof-of-concept screens were performed in U2OS osteosarcoma cells to assess two cases of subcellular protein localisation: i) PINK1-dependent Parkin translocation to mitochondria, and ii) nuclear localisation of the transcription factor, TFEB, in response to starvation. In addition to detecting alterations in protein localisation, the authors suggest this approach can be adapted to identify genes regulating organelle abundance, size and shape.

Schematic of the AI-PS platform. Figure 3a of this preprint made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

What I liked about these preprints:

CRISPR-based genetic screens are widely used in many fields to relate genotype and phenotype. These preprints caught my attention in providing new tools to enrich previously unselectable phenotypes. I also found it interesting that different cell ‘types’ can be marked for FACS sorting, either by varying the photo-conversion time or expressing additional photoactivatable-fluorescent proteins per cell. While Yan et al’s approach requires developing an analysis code for each phenotype of interest, the authors state this could be overcome by implementing image analysis strategies such as deep learning, an approach adopted by Kanfer et al in developing AI-PS. The high-throughput image analysis methods presented by these authors can be adapted for different microscope systems and phenotypes of interest, thus broadening the range of cellular and subcellular phenotypes that can be assessed by pooled CRISPR screens.


Questions to the authors:

  • Both authors: do you envision this technique could be adapted to CRISPR screens in 3D cultures?
  • Yan et al: your data suggest that image-based assessment could provide an improved hit yield for phenotypes that could be indirectly screened by other approaches, such as fluorescence intensity or FSC signal. Do you consider this improvement to outweigh the time needed for initial engineering of a PA-mCherry cell line?
  • Both authors: Both preprints state a limitation is the requirement for live cell screening. Does the efficiency of photo-conversion differ in live and fixed cells? What approaches do you intend to expand your method to screen for processes requiring fixation?


1 Feldman, D. et al. Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells. Cell 179, 787-799 e717, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.016 (2019).

2 Wang, C. et al. Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 10842-10851, doi:10.1073/pnas.1903808116 (2019).

3 Chien, M. P. et al. Photostick: a method for selective isolation of target cells from culture. Chem Sci 6, 1701-1705, doi:10.1039/C4SC03676J (2015).

4 Piatkevich, K. D. et al. A robotic multidimensional directed evolution approach applied to fluorescent voltage reporters. Nat Chem Biol 14, 352-360, doi:10.1038/s41589-018-0004-9 (2018).

5 Hasle, N. et al. High-throughput, microscope-based sorting to dissect cellular heterogeneity. Mol Syst Biol 16, e9442, doi:10.15252/msb.20209442 (2020).

6 Wheeler, E. C. et al. Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microraft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors. Nat Methods 17, 636-642 doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0826-8 (2020).

Tags: crispr/cas9, genetic screens, microscopy, photoactivation

Posted on: 10th August 2020


(No Ratings Yet)

Author's response

Xiaowei, Nico and Ron shared about High-content Imaging-based Pooled CRISPR Screens in Mammalian Cells

Thanks for your detailed summary and great questions!

To address your question:

  1. 3D cultures are great for studying cell behavior in a physiological environment. In theory, our technique could be applied to 3D cultures, although there are several technical hurdles: 1) fast 3D imaging and computational abilities to allow real time cell identification and photo-activation; 2) z specificity needed for efficient 3D photo-activation; 3) full dissociation of 3D culture into single cells for FACS.  These hurdles can be addressed, for instance using high performance GPUs to improve computational capacity and by photo-activating with 3D holograms created using spatial light modulators, and/or multi-photon photo-conversion.  This is an interesting idea and worth further investigation.
  2. In our study, we designed this experiment mostly to compare the new screening method with existing technologies, thus the initial engineering effort was not an important factor. In most cases, when encountering questions that can be indirectly screened by easier approaches, the improvement may not outweigh the extra effort, especially if one could gain enough information from indirect screening approaches.  However, screening using different assays provides different information and choosing which one to use depends on the exact research question of interest.
  3. Our technique can not be applied to fixed cells currently because: 1) it is unclear how the fixation process will affect the photo-activation ability of PA-mCherry; 2) it is not easy to harvest cells from imaging plates after fixation; 3) it is unclear how fixation might affect the high-throughput sequencing procedure. Much progress has been made in developing fixation-resistant photo-activation fluorescent proteins and solutions for preserving cells for high-throughput sequencing after fixation1-3.  Thus we envision that these issues could be solved.  Other imaging-based screening techniques work with fixed cells, for example, the techniques developed in the Blainey lab4 and Zhuang lab5 using in situ sequencing/hybridization to retrieve sgRNA information.

Thanks again for your interest in our work and your questions!



1 Xiang, C. C. et al. Using DSP, a reversible cross-linker, to fix tissue sections for immunostaining, microdissection and expression profiling. Nucleic Acids Res 32, e185, doi:10.1093/nar/gnh185 (2004).

2 Paez-Segala, M. G. et al. Fixation-resistant photoactivatable fluorescent proteins for CLEM. Nat Methods 12, 215-218, 214 p following 218, doi:10.1038/nmeth.3225 (2015).

3 Alles, J. et al. Cell fixation and preservation for droplet-based single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Biol 15, 44, doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0383-5 (2017).

4 Feldman, D. et al. Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells. Cell 179, 787-799 e717, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.016 (2019).

5 Wang, C., Lu, T., Emanuel, G., Babcock, H. P. & Zhuang, X. Imaging-based pooled CRISPR screening reveals regulators of lncRNA localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 10842-10851, doi:10.1073/pnas.1903808116 (2019).

Have your say

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here

preLists in the cell biology category:

FENS 2020

A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020


List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

This preList contains preprints about the latest findings on Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) in various model organisms at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.


List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite

[under construction] Preprints presented at the (fully virtual) EMBL BioMalPar XVI, 17-18 May 2020 #emblmalaria


List by Gautam Dey, Samantha Seah


Cell Polarity

Recent research from the field of cell polarity is summarized in this list of preprints. It comprises of studies focusing on various forms of cell polarity ranging from epithelial polarity, planar cell polarity to front-to-rear polarity.


List by Yamini Ravichandran

TAGC 2020

Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20


List by Maiko Kitaoka, Madhuja Samaddar, Miguel V. Almeida, Sejal Davla, Jennifer Ann Black, Gautam Dey

3D Gastruloids

A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells). Preprint missing? Don't hesitate to let us know.


List by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome


List by Hiral Shah

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)


List by Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019


List by Gautam Dey


Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.


List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

Lung Disease and Regeneration

This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.


List by Rob Hynds

Cellular metabolism

A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.


List by Pablo Ranea Robles

BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019


List by Gautam Dey


This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.


List by Sandra Franco Iborra

Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019

Few of the preprints that were discussed in the recent BPS annual meeting at Baltimore, USA


List by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018

This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.


List by Gautam Dey, Amanda Haage