Menu

Close

A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression.

Jeroen van den Berg, Anna G. Manjon, Karoline Kielbassa, Femke M. Feringa, Raimundo Freire, Rene H. Medema

Preprint posted on May 07, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/07/316158

How many breaks do you need to stop a cell cycle? Utilizing CRISPR/Cas9, van den Berg et al. demonstrate that just one break is all it takes to slow a cell’s proliferation.

Selected by Leighton Daigh

Background

Cellular genomic integrity is constantly challenged by endogenous and exogenous threats, requiring persistent surveillance and repair. Cells possess numerous complex, intertwined pathways capable of resolving numerous types of DNA damage. Many of the cellular processes involved in the DNA damage response have been elucidated by classical studies using chemical mutagens and ionizing radiation to induce DNA breaks. While these methods proved effective for identifying the major components of the DNA damage response, the methods are also nonspecific and cause DNA damage in a broad and untargeted manner across the genome.

Inhibition of the cell-cycle following DNA damage is achieved through numerous pathways. The DNA damage-responsive kinases ATR and ATM induce a rapid inhibition of proliferation by activating a kinase cascade. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which drive cellular proliferation, are quickly phosphorylated by downstream kinases ATR or ATM, resulting in an immediate inhibition of the cell cycle. The transcription factor p53 drives a more delayed inhibition of cellular proliferation following DNA damage through numerous mechanisms. One such mechanism is the transcriptional upregulation of p21, which halts proliferation by binding to and inhibiting CDK/Cyclin complexes.

Prior studies have attempted to achieve greater control in the genomic location of DNA breaks by using endonucleases targeting specific DNA sequences. However, these methods are limited by the availability of endonuclease target sites within the genome. Presently, it’s largely unknown how the precise number of DNA breaks and their timing at different cell-cycle phases affects cellular proliferation.

Key Findings

To address this knowledge gap, van den Berg et. al utilized the flexibility of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cleavage at specified DNA sequences to determine how the precise number of DNA double-strand breaks affects the DNA damage response and cell-cycle progression. The authors first showed that CRISPR/Cas9 expression can be tightly controlled by combining Tet-On transcriptional control with destabilizing-domain post-translational control of the Cas9 nuclease, allowing tight temporal control over when in the cell cycle Cas9 is active. This was important, as it greatly decreased the background rate of Cas9-mediated DNA damage and improved sensitivity in the assay. A precise number of double-strand breaks could then be induced by choosing guide RNAs with a desired number of target sites in the genome. The authors validated the precision of this strategy by showing that the number of DNA damage foci observed by immunofluorescence closely correlates with the number of genomic sites targeted by a specified guide RNA (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Panels reproduced from Figure 2B of van den Berg et al., 2018 under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 international license, representing DNA damage markers γH2AX and 53BP1. The number of genomic loci targeted with each guide RNA is indicated, ranging from 1 to 17.

 

The authors next evaluated the downstream consequences of inducing a single DNA break. They observed that inducing cleavage at one DNA locus was sufficient to activate the G1 or G2 checkpoint by inducing an ATM- and p53-driven DNA damage response. These checkpoints prevent cellular progression from G1- to S-phase or G2- to M-phase, respectively. Interestingly, damage that occurred in G1 appeared to result in more sustained inhibition of cellular proliferation, as compared to G2 damage. Cell-cycle arrest appeared to be temporary; the authors did not observe an increase in p21 or signs of cellular senescence that would indicate a more long-term inhibition of proliferation. These results make sense: cells regularly experience double-strand breaks and other DNA lesions. If an individual double-strand break caused long-term or permanent cell cycle arrest, there would be insufficient proliferative cells for the establishment and maintenance of tissue homeostasis. The authors conclude the preprint by demonstrating that inhibition of proliferation following a single DNA break is functionally important. If the DNA damage response is experimentally inhibited, cells undergo more irreversible DNA damage and lose their proliferative potential.

What I like about this preprint

This preprint nicely characterizes the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for time- and site-specific induction of DNA damage. The authors demonstrate the utility of this tool and validate the downstream effects of inducing an individual double-strand break. Importantly, this lays the groundwork for future studies to use CRISPR/Cas9 genomic targeting to determine if DNA double-strand breaks at specific genomic loci induce unique DNA damage responses. Moreover, the temporal control of the system enables further investigation of how a DNA break at a specified locus may induce differential DNA damage responses depending on cell states such as cell-cycle phase, cell differentiation, etc.

Questions for Authors

  • It’s possible that multiple rounds of cutting and repair occur at a targeted DNA locus before the gRNA binding sequence is destroyed by low fidelity repair. Is it possible to estimate exactly how many times the DNA is cut before the gRNA will no longer target Cas9 to the site?
  • The lack of p21 upregulation following Cas9 cleavage at a single site is intriguing. Is there a threshold for the number of DNA breaks that must occur before there is an upregulation of p21?
  • Could a Cas9 nickase be used to study the cellular response to single-strand breaks in an analogous manner?

Further Reading

  • Brinkman EK, Chen T, de Haas M, Holland HA, Akhtar W, van Steensel B (2018) Kinetics and Fidelity of the Repair of Cas9-Induced Double-Strand DNA Breaks. Molecular Cell 70: 801-813.
  • Chao HX, Poovey CE, Privette AA, Grant GD, Chao HY, Cook JG, Purvis JE (2017) Orchestration of DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics across the Human Cell Cycle. Cell Syst 5: 445–459.
  • Janssen A, Breuer GA, Brinkman EK, Van Der Meulen AI, Borden S V., Van Steense B, Bindra RS, Larocque JR, Karpen GH, Meulen AI Van Der, et al. (2016) A single double-strand break system reveals repair dynamics and mechanisms in heterochromatin and Euchromatin. Genes Dev 30: 1645–1657.
  • Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2012) p53 Dynamics Control Cell Fate. Science 336: 1440–1444.

 

Posted on: 1st August 2018 , updated on: 4th September 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    Revealing the nanoscale morphology of the primary cilium using super-resolution fluorescence microscopy

    Joshua Yoon, Colin J. Comerci, Lucien E. Weiss, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    Signaling dynamics control cell fate in the early Drosophila embryo

    Heath E Johnson, Stanislav Y Shvartsman, Jared E Toettcher



    Selected by Yara E. Sánchez Corrales

    1

    Lysosome exocytosis is required for mitosis

    Charlotte Nugues, Nordine Helassa, Robert Burgoyne, et al.



    Selected by claudia conte

    Three-dimensional tissue stiffness mapping in the mouse embryo supports durotaxis during early limb bud morphogenesis

    Min Zhu, Hirotaka Tao, Mohammad Samani, et al.



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    3D Tissue elongation via ECM stiffness-cued junctional remodeling

    Dong-Yuan Chen, Justin Crest, Sebastian J Streichan, et al.



    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    Transient intracellular acidification regulates the core transcriptional heat shock response

    Catherine G Triandafillou, Christopher D Katanski, Aaron R Dinner, et al.



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    1

    Budding yeast complete DNA replication after chromosome segregation begins

    Tsvetomira Ivanova, Michael Maier, Alsu Missarova, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey, Maiko Kitaoka

    Developmental heterogeneity of microglia and brain myeloid cells revealed by deep single-cell RNA sequencing

    Qingyun Li, Zuolin Cheng, Lu Zhou, et al.



    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    SABER enables highly multiplexed and amplified detection of DNA and RNA in cells and tissues

    Jocelyn Y. Kishi, Brian J. Beliveau, Sylvain W. Lapan, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    PIKfyve/Fab1 is required for efficient V-ATPase and hydrolase delivery to phagosomes, phagosomal killing, and restriction of Legionella infection

    Catherine M Buckley, Victoria L Heath, Aurelie Gueho, et al.



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    1

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    1

    Aurora A depletion reveals centrosome-independent polarization mechanism in C. elegans

    Kerstin Klinkert, Nicolas Levernier, Peter Gross, et al.

    AND

    Centrosome Aurora A gradient ensures a single PAR-2 polarity axis by regulating RhoGEF ECT-2 localization in C. elegans embryos

    Sachin Kotak, Sukriti Kapoor



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.



    Selected by Coert Margadant

    Neural crest cells regulate optic cup morphogenesis by promoting extracellular matrix assembly

    Chase Dallas Bryan, Rebecca Lynne Pfeiffer, Bryan William Jones, et al.



    Selected by Ashrifia Adomako-Ankomah

    1

    mRNA localisation in endothelial cells regulates blood vessel sprouting

    Guilherme Costa, Nawseen Tarannum, Shane Herbert



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    Also in the molecular biology category:

    Signaling dynamics control cell fate in the early Drosophila embryo

    Heath E Johnson, Stanislav Y Shvartsman, Jared E Toettcher



    Selected by Yara E. Sánchez Corrales

    1

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Target-specific precision of CRISPR-mediated genome editing

    Anob M Chakrabarti, Tristan Henser-Brownhill, Josep Monserrat, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Transient intracellular acidification regulates the core transcriptional heat shock response

    Catherine G Triandafillou, Christopher D Katanski, Aaron R Dinner, et al.



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    1

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    1

    Site-specific K63 ubiquitinomics reveals post-initiation regulation of ribosomes under oxidative stress

    Songhee Back, Christine Vogel, Gustavo M Silva



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    1

    Quantitative, real-time, single cell analysis in tissue reveals expression dynamics of neurogenesis

    Cerys S Manning, Veronica Biga, James Boyd, et al.



    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    1

    Moving beyond P values: Everyday data analysis with estimation plots

    Joses Ho, Tayfun Tumkaya, Sameer Aryal, et al.



    Selected by Gautam Dey

    1

    A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression.

    Jeroen van den Berg, Anna G. Manjon, Karoline Kielbassa, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs

    Chong Tang, Tian Yu, Yeming Xie, et al.



    Selected by Fabio Liberante

    Dynamics and interactions of ADP/ATP transporter AAC3 in DPC detergent are not functionally relevant

    Vilius Kurauskas, Audrey Hessel, François Dehez, et al.

    AND

    Major concerns with the integrity of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier in dodecyl-phosphocholine used for solution NMR studies

    Martin S. King, Paul G. Crichton, Jonathan J. Ruprecht, et al.



    Selected by Reid Alderson

    1

    Targeting light-gated chloride channels to neuronal somatodendritic domain reduces their excitatory effect in the axon

    Jessica Messier, Hongmei Chen, Zhao-Lin Cai, et al.

    AND

    High-efficiency optogenetic silencing with soma-targeted anion-conducting channelrhodopsins

    Mathias Mahn, Lihi Gibor, Katayun Cohen-Kashi Malina, et al.



    Selected by Mahesh Karnani

    2

    Glutamic acid is a carrier for hydrazine during the biosyntheses of fosfazinomycin and kinamycin

    Kwo-Kwang Abraham Wang, Tai L. Ng, Peng Wang, et al.



    Selected by Ellis O'Neill

    The Histone H3-H4 Tetramer is a Copper Reductase Enzyme

    Narsis Attar, Oscar A Campos, Maria Vogelauer, et al.



    Selected by Lauren Neves

    Super-Mendelian inheritance mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in the female mouse germline

    Hannah A. Grunwald, Valentino M. Gantz, Gunnar Poplawski, et al.



    Selected by Rebekah Tillotson

    1

    Close