Menu

Close

Genetic compensation is triggered by mutant mRNA degradation

Mohamed El-Brolosy, Andrea Rossi, Zacharias Kontarakis, Carsten Kuenne, Stefan Guenther, Nana Fukuda, Carter Takacs, Shih-Lei Lai, Ryuichi Fukuda, Claudia Gerri, Khrievono Kikhi, Antonio Giraldez, Didier Y.R. Stainier

Preprint posted on May 22, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/22/328153

Nonsense mediated decay of mutant mRNA can trigger genetic compensation via specific transcriptional upregulation of related genes in stable knock-out models.

Selected by Andreas van Impel

Background

In the last years, advances in TALEN and CRISPR genome editing technologies have made it reasonably easy to generate loss of function alleles for any given gene in many model systems used. These reverse genetic approaches led to a number of reports describing evident discrepancies between stable genetic knock-out models and results obtained by knock-down strategies (e.g. morpholino antisense oligomers or siRNAs) for the same gene. In most cases these phenotypic differences have been attributed to off-target hits or toxic effects of the employed knock-down reagents [1]. One study in zebrafish, however, reported on the upregulation of related genes in mutants but not after using transcriptional or translational knock-down approaches, suggesting that the phenotypic differences can be explained by a specific compensatory response in the knock-out but not the knock-down models for this gene [2]. Whether such a genetic compensation represents a general phenomenon that applies to many mutant situations and that -to some extent- protects organisms against deleterious mutations remains unclear. Furthermore it is not known how such transcriptional adaption responses are triggered in the mutant situation and how this could be possibly circumvented when generating novel mutant alleles.

 

Key findings

The authors of this preprint tackle the question at which level and via which signal a genetic compensation mechanism can trigger the upregulation of related genes that partially or even fully compensate for the loss of the respective gene function. Using zebrafish and mouse models, the authors report for a number of mutants a transcriptional upregulation of paralogues or related family members of the mutant gene, even in the heterozygous state. Injection of the respective wild type mRNA does not reduce this response, indicating that the compensation mechanism is activated upstream of the loss of functional protein. They further show that for several of the genes analysed other nonsense mutation alleles exist that do not show transcriptional adaptation arguing against the DNA lesion itself to activate the response. However, when checking the amount of mutant mRNA present in those alleles, El-Brolosy et al. observe a strong correlation between the extent of the transcriptional adaptation response and the levels of mutant mRNA decay. In line with this finding, blockage of the nonsense mediated decay pathway results in higher mutant mRNA levels and consequently in a reduced or absent transcriptional adaptation response. Even injection of uncapped (and therefore instable) mRNA is sufficient to trigger transcriptional adaptation in a sequence-similarity specific manner, suggesting that degradation-intermediates of the mRNA decay pathway might initiate the compensatory response (see figure).

Finally the authors generate CRISPR-induced promoter (or whole gene) deletions to obtain alleles in which the mutant mRNA is not even transcribed in the first place. Importantly, these ‘RNA-less’ mutants fail to upregulate compensating genes, suggesting that the generation of such alleles could circumvent the here described genetic compensation mechanisms and unravel phenotypes that would have normally been masked by transcriptional adaptation.

 

Model showing the proposed mechanism underlying the transcriptional adaption response to mutations. Red dot: mutation, PTC: premature termination codon, TC: termination codon, DFs: degradation factors, RBPs: RNA binding proteins (reproduced from El-Brolosy et al., Fig. 4 )

 

Why this is important

The work from El-Brolosy et al. indicates the existence of a conserved mechanism triggering genetic compensation via transcriptional upregulation of related genes. This compensation seems to be based on the instability of the mutant mRNA and the related availability of mRNA degradation products in the cells. Although the exact molecular mechanism of this response still remains enigmatic, the presented work clearly argues for the generation and analysis of knock-out models, in which the transcription of the gene is blocked completely (e.g. via deletion of the whole promoter region). Such an approach should minimize the risk of transcriptional adaptation-derived compensation effects masking a possible requirement for the gene of interest. Hence, producing ‘RNA-less’ alleles represents an important strategy for the CRISPR- and TALEN-mediated generation of novel mutants in different model systems in the future.

 

Open questions

  • How exactly is the presence of mRNA degradation products transduced into a specific transcriptional upregulation of related genes? What molecular machinery is involved in this process?
  • How frequent is this type of mRNA decay-dependent genetic compensation? Is it a general phenomenon that is applicable for most/many genes in the genome?
  • Is this pathway conserved throughout evolution (e.g. in Arabidopsis, yeast and Drosophila)?

 

Further reading

[1]          Kok, F. O. et al. Reverse Genetic Screening Reveals Poor Correlation between Morpholino-Induced and Mutant Phenotypes in Zebrafish. Dev Cell. 32:97±108 (2015).

[2]          Rossi, A. et al. Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature 524, 230-233 (2015).

[3]          El-Brolosy, M. A. & Stainier, D. Y. R. Genetic compensation: A phenomenon in search of mechanisms. PLoS genetics 13 (2017).

Tags: genetic robustness, genome engineering

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Author's response

    Mohamed El-Brolosy and Didier Stainier shared

    How exactly is the presence of mRNA degradation products transduced into a specific transcriptional upregulation of related genes? What molecular machinery is involved in this process?

    Previous studies have reported that mRNA decay factors can translocate to the nucleus (in a manner dependent on their ability to degrade mRNA) and bind chromatin to promote gene expression (for example: Haimovich et al., Cell 2013).  Other studies have reported genetic and physical interactions of several decay factors with a number of proteins involved in gene expression including RNA pol II, chromatin remodelers and histone modifying enzymes.  As we show in Fig. 4a, a majority of the genes exhibiting sequence similarity with the mutated gene’s mRNA are upregulated in the mutant cells, suggesting a model whereby mRNA decay products guide mRNA decay factors to specific genes in a homology-mediated base-pairing fashion.  Other models are of course also possible, and the transcriptional adaptation response might in addition involve antisense or non-coding RNAs (Fig. S10).

     

    How frequent is this type of mRNA decay-dependent genetic compensation? Is it a general phenomenon that is applicable for most/many genes in the genome?

    The transcriptional adaptation machinery via mRNA decay appears to be using broadly expressed components; however, it is important to note that this transcriptional adaptation response will not always lead to functional compensation as the upregulated genes may not be able to assume the function of the mutated gene.

     

    Is this pathway conserved throughout evolution (e.g. in Arabidopsis, yeast and Drosophila)?

    Genetic compensation is observed in many organisms (El-Brolosy and Stainier, PLOS Genetics 2017). For example, a lack of phenotypes was reported for several Arabidopsis mutants (Bouche and Bouchez, Curr. Opinion in Plant Biology2001); in C. elegans, incomplete penetrance of skn1 mutants was attributed to variability in expression levels of the compensating gene end-1 (Raj et al., Nature 2010);and in Drosophila, there are several examples of discrepancy between knockout and knockdown phenotypes, which might be due to genetic compensation (Yamamoto et al., Cell 2014).  Of course, one has to investigate each individual case in detail and determine whether transcriptional adaptation and mRNA decay are involved; we are currently conducting studies in yeast and C. elegans.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    Human macrophages survive and adopt activated genotypes in living zebrafish

    Colin D. Paul, Alexus Devine, Kevin Bishop, et al.



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Altering the temporal regulation of one transcription factor drives sensory trade-offs

    Ariane Ramaekers, Simon Weinberger, Annelies Claeys, et al.



    Selected by Mariana R.P. Alves

    Presence of midline cilia supersedes the expression of Lefty1 in forming the midline barrier during the establishment of left-right asymmetry

    Natalia A Shylo, Dylan A Ramrattan, Scott D Weatherbee



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Cellular Crowding Influences Extrusion and Proliferation to Facilitate Epithelial Tissue Repair

    Jovany Jeomar Franco, Youmna Maryline Atieh, Chase Dallas Bryan, et al.



    Selected by Helen Weavers

    Photoperiod sensing of the circadian clock is controlled by ELF3 and GI

    Usman Anwer, Amanda Davis, Seth Jon Davis, et al.



    Selected by Annika Weimer

    Limb- and tendon-specific Adamtsl2 deletion identifies a soft tissue mechanism modulating bone length

    Dirk Hubmacher, Stetson Thacker, Sheila M Adams, et al.



    Selected by Alberto Rosello-Diez

    A non-cell autonomous actin redistribution enables isotropic retinal growth

    Marija Matejcic, Guillaume Salbreux, Caren Norden



    Selected by Yara E. Sánchez Corrales

    1

    Rearing temperature and fatty acid supplementation jointly affect membrane fluidity and heat tolerance in Daphnia

    Dominik Martin-Creuzburg, Bret L. Coggins, Dieter Ebert, et al.



    Selected by Alexander Little

    A SoxB gene acts as an anterior gap gene and regulates posterior segment addition in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum

    Christian L. B. Paese, Anna Schoenauer, Daniel J. Leite, et al.



    Selected by Erik Clark

    1

    Cell type-specific interchromosomal interactions as a mechanism for transcriptional diversity

    Adan Horta, Kevin Monahan, Lisa Bashkirova, et al.



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    Germ layer specific regulation of cell polarity and adhesion gives insight into the evolution of mesoderm.

    Miguel Salinas-Saavedra, Amber Q. Rock, Mark Q. Martindale



    Selected by ClaireS & SophieM

    1

    Wnt/β-catenin regulates an ancient signaling network during zebrafish scale development

    Andrew J Aman, Alexis N Fulbright, David M Parichy



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    Tissue flow induces cell shape changes during organogenesis

    Gonca Erdemci-Tandogan, Madeline J.Clark, Jeffrey D. Amack, et al.



    Selected by Jacky G. Goetz

    Temporal Control of Transcription by Zelda in living Drosophila embryos

    Jeremy Dufourt, Antonio Trullo, Jennifer Hunter, et al.



    Selected by Teresa Rayon

    1

    An atlas of silencer elements for the human and mouse genomes

    Naresh Doni Jayavelu, Ajay Jajodia, Arpit Mishra, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Genetically regulated human NODAL splice variants are differentially post-transcriptionally processed and functionally distinct

    Scott D Findlay, Olena Bilyk, Kiefer Lypka, et al.



    Selected by Pierre Osteil

    Also in the genetics category:

    A robust method for transfection in choanoflagellates illuminates their cell biology and the ancestry of animal septins

    David Booth, Heather Middleton, Nicole King



    Selected by Maya Emmons-Bell

    SWI/SNF remains localized to chromatin in the presence of SCHLAP1

    Jesse R Raab, Keriayn N Smith, Camarie C Spear, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    1

    Genetic compensation is triggered by mutant mRNA degradation

    Mohamed El-Brolosy, Andrea Rossi, Zacharias Kontarakis, et al.



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    1

    Cellular Crowding Influences Extrusion and Proliferation to Facilitate Epithelial Tissue Repair

    Jovany Jeomar Franco, Youmna Maryline Atieh, Chase Dallas Bryan, et al.



    Selected by Helen Weavers

    Limb- and tendon-specific Adamtsl2 deletion identifies a soft tissue mechanism modulating bone length

    Dirk Hubmacher, Stetson Thacker, Sheila M Adams, et al.



    Selected by Alberto Rosello-Diez

    Cancer modeling by Transgene Electroporation in Adult Zebrafish (TEAZ)

    Scott J Callahan, Stephanie Tepan, Yan M Zhang, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    1

    PDX Finder: A Portal for Patient-Derived tumor Xenograft Model Discovery

    Nathalie Conte, Jeremy Mason, Csaba Halmagyi, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Bioelectric-calcineurin signaling module regulates allometric growth and size of the zebrafish fin

    Jacob Daane, Jennifer Lanni, Ina Rothenberg, et al.



    Selected by Alberto Rosello-Diez

    1

    Long-term live imaging of the Drosophila adult midgut reveals real-time dynamics of cell division, differentiation, and loss

    Judy Martin, Erin Nicole Sanders, Paola Moreno-Roman, et al.



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    F-actin patches nucleated on chromosomes coordinate capture by microtubules in oocyte meiosis

    Mariia Burdyniuk, Andrea Callegari, Masashi Mori, et al.



    Selected by Binyam Mogessie

    Comprehensive characterization of transcript diversity at the human NODAL locus

    Scott D Findlay, Lynne-Marie Postovit



    Selected by Christian Ramos

    Cell-nonautonomous local and systemic responses to cell arrest enable long-bone catch-up growth

    Alberto Rosello-Diez, Linda Madisen, Sebastien Bastide, et al.



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    Precise temporal regulation of alternative splicing during neural development

    Sebastien M Weyn-Vanhentenryck, Huijuan Feng, Dmytro Ustianenko, et al.



    Selected by James Gagnon

    Mutations in Bcl9 and Pygo genes cause congenital heart defects by tissue-specific perturbation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling

    Claudio Cantù, Anastasia Felker, Dario Zimmerli, et al.



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    Insect wings and body wall evolved from ancient leg segments

    Heather S Bruce, Nipam H Patel

    AND

    Two sets of wing homologs in the crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis

    Courtney M Clark-Hachtel, Yoshinori Tomoyasu



    Selected by Erik Clark

    2

    Close

    We want to make our website, and the services we provide, useful and reliable. This sometimes involves placing small amounts of information called cookies on the device you used to access the internet. If you continue to use this website we will assume you are happy to accept our cookies.

    Accept