Oncogenic signaling alters cell shape and mechanics to facilitate cell division under confinement
Preprint posted on March 09, 2019 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/571885v1
Most animal cells undergo different degrees of rounding up when entering mitosis both in cell culture and in vivo (Cadart et al. 2014). This is important for accurate spindle positioning and metaphase plate formation (Lancaster and Baum, 2014). For cells to survive, they need to maintain division in the complex environments. In order to do so, cells require contractility of acto-myosin cytoskeleton (Champion et al. 2017). To understand how mitosis successfully occurs in different extra-cellular environments, it is imperative to study the role of contractility, the upstream regulators of contractility and mechanics during this process.
To understand how cancer cells, regulate contractility to successfully divide in different environments, the authors transformed epithelial cells (MCF10A) by over-expressing a single oncogene, Rasv12. This is a simple system to look at the role of upstream signaling in regulating mitotic rounding without the caveats of having extra chromosome numbers or centrosome aberrations. The authors find that inducible Ras activation signals through the MEK/ERK pathway and enhances cell rounding during mitosis. They also show that Ras activation alters Rho-based contractility during mitosis. To understand how this transformation effects the mechanics of dividing cells, they measure the stiffness of the cells sitting on the surface by using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and real time deformability cytometry (RT-DC), a high- throughput method to measure the stiffness of cells in suspension. Interestingly, Ras activation leads to softer cells during interphase but stiffer cells during metaphase. The role of Ras activation in enhancing mitotic rounding becomes more obvious under stiff confinement. The authors show that increase in contractility is required for the push to successfully divide and reduce mitotic defects under confinement.
What I liked about the preprint
It is interesting for me that small term activation of Ras is enough for changing the mechanics of the cell undergoing mitosis. Authors show the importance of oncogenic signaling that could provide cancer cells with a capacity to undergo mitosis successfully in confinements like tumor spheroids and cells undergoing EMT. Therefore, this is a study that shows another example of temporal regulation of signaling controlling mechanics and cellular geometry.
What’s next and my questions to the author:
I would be curious to know how the interphase cells with Ras activation show reduced stiffness when attached to the surface and even when in suspension. According to previous studies, I could find that cells are only softer in loosely adhered cells (Gullekson et al. 2017). Ras/ERK activation clearly regulates cortical contractility during mitosis, my view would be that this happens via changes in the cortical thickness that would maintain cortical tension. This could be measured by STORM imaging during various stages of mitosis. It is still not clear to me how Ras activation, even before cells enter interphase, regulate stiffness temporally. One way I could see how cancer cells could achieve this would be regulating mitotic kinases like CDK1, which would then feed on to Rho signaling. A previous study showed that oncogenic Ras suppresses CDK1 expression (Huang et al. 2013). It will be interesting to see how CDK1, ROCK and ECT2 (RhoA-GEF) localization changes with progression of mitosis.
Gullekson, Corinne, Gheorghe Cojoc, Mirjam Schürmann, Jochen Guck, and Andrew Pelling. 2017. “Mechanical Mismatch between Ras Transformed and Untransformed Epithelial Cells.” Soft Matter 13 (45): 8483–91.
Huang, Tun-Lan, Jerry P. Pian, and Bin-Tao Pan. 2013. “Oncogenic Ras Suppresses Cdk1 in a Complex Manner during the Incubation of Activated Xenopus Egg Extracts.” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2013.01.006.
Lancaster, Oscar M., and Buzz Baum. 2014. “Shaping up to Divide: Coordinating Actin and Microtubule Cytoskeletal Remodelling during Mitosis.” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 34 (October): 109–15.
Posted on: 1st May 2019 , updated on: 3rd May 2019Read preprint
Also in the cancer biology category:
Adipocyte vesicles: ‘all-in-one’ packages that stimulate tumor mitochondrial metabolism and dynamics
|Selected by||Hannah Brunsdon|
Intravital optoacoustic ultrasound bio-microscopy reveals radiation-inhibited skull angiogenesis
|Selected by||Mariana De Niz|
AGO1x prevents dsRNA-induced interferon signaling to promote breast cancer cell proliferation
|Selected by||Lorenzo Lafranchi|
Also in the cell biology category:
Precisely control mitochondria with light to manipulate cell fate decision
|Selected by||Amberley Stephens, Amberley Stephens|
Molecularly distinct cores coexist inside stress granules
|Selected by||Tessa Sinnige|
Cytoskeletal tension actively sustains the migratory T cell synaptic contact
|Selected by||Tim Fessenden|
preListscancer biology category:in the
Also in the cell biology category:
Lung Disease and Regeneration
This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.
|List by||Rob Hynds|
A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.
|List by||Pablo Ranea Robles|
BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019
|List by||Gautam Dey|
This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.
|List by||Sandra Franco Iborra|
ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018
This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.
|List by||Gautam Dey, Amanda Haage|