Oncogenic signaling alters cell shape and mechanics to facilitate cell division under confinement

Helen K. Matthews, Sushila Ganguli, Katarzyna Plak, Anna V. Taubenberger, Matthieu Piel, Jochen Guck, Buzz Baum

Preprint posted on 9 March 2019 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/571885v1

Article now published in Developmental Cell at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.004

Cancer cells know when to be stiff!

Selected by Ankita Jha

Categories: cancer biology, cell biology

Context:

Most animal cells undergo different degrees of rounding up when entering mitosis both in cell culture and in vivo (Cadart et al. 2014). This is important for accurate spindle positioning and metaphase plate formation (Lancaster and Baum, 2014). For cells to survive, they need to maintain division in the complex environments. In order to do so, cells require contractility of acto-myosin cytoskeleton (Champion et al. 2017). To understand how mitosis successfully occurs in different extra-cellular environments, it is imperative to study the role of contractility, the upstream regulators of contractility and mechanics during this process.

Major findings:

To understand how cancer cells, regulate contractility to successfully divide in different environments, the authors transformed epithelial cells (MCF10A) by over-expressing a single oncogene, Rasv12. This is a simple system to look at the role of upstream signaling in regulating mitotic rounding without the caveats of having extra chromosome numbers or centrosome aberrations. The authors find that inducible Ras activation signals through the MEK/ERK pathway and enhances cell rounding during mitosis. They also show that Ras activation alters Rho-based contractility during mitosis. To understand how this transformation effects the mechanics of dividing cells, they measure the stiffness of the cells sitting on the surface by using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and real time deformability cytometry (RT-DC), a high- throughput method to measure the stiffness of cells in suspension. Interestingly, Ras activation leads to softer cells during interphase but stiffer cells during metaphase. The role of Ras activation in enhancing mitotic rounding becomes more obvious under stiff confinement. The authors show that increase in contractility is required for the push to successfully divide and reduce mitotic defects under confinement.

What I liked about the preprint

It is interesting for me that small term activation of Ras is enough for changing the mechanics of the cell undergoing mitosis. Authors show the importance of oncogenic signaling that could provide cancer cells with a capacity to undergo mitosis successfully in confinements like tumor spheroids and cells undergoing EMT. Therefore, this is a study that shows another example of temporal regulation of signaling controlling mechanics and cellular geometry.

What’s next and my questions to the author:

I would be curious to know how the interphase cells with Ras activation show reduced stiffness when attached to the surface and even when in suspension. According to previous studies, I could find that cells are only softer in loosely adhered cells (Gullekson et al. 2017). Ras/ERK activation clearly regulates cortical contractility during mitosis, my view would be that this happens via changes in the cortical thickness that would maintain cortical tension. This could be measured by STORM imaging during various stages of mitosis. It is still not clear to me how Ras activation, even before cells enter interphase, regulate stiffness temporally. One way I could see how cancer cells could achieve this would be regulating mitotic kinases like CDK1, which would then feed on to Rho signaling. A previous study showed that oncogenic Ras suppresses CDK1 expression (Huang et al. 2013). It will be interesting to see how CDK1, ROCK and ECT2 (RhoA-GEF) localization changes with progression of mitosis.

References

Cadart, Clotilde, Ewa Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz, Maël Le Berre, Matthieu Piel, and Helen K. Matthews. 2014. “Exploring the Function of Cell Shape and Size during Mitosis.” Developmental Cell 29 (2): 159–69.

Champion, Lysie, Monika I. Linder, and Ulrike Kutay. 2017. “Cellular Reorganization during Mitotic Entry.” Trends in Cell Biology 27 (1): 26–41.

Gullekson, Corinne, Gheorghe Cojoc, Mirjam Schürmann, Jochen Guck, and Andrew Pelling. 2017. “Mechanical Mismatch between Ras Transformed and Untransformed Epithelial Cells.” Soft Matter 13 (45): 8483–91.

Huang, Tun-Lan, Jerry P. Pian, and Bin-Tao Pan. 2013. “Oncogenic Ras Suppresses Cdk1 in a Complex Manner during the Incubation of Activated Xenopus Egg Extracts.” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2013.01.006 .

Lancaster, Oscar M., and Buzz Baum. 2014. “Shaping up to Divide: Coordinating Actin and Microtubule Cytoskeletal Remodelling during Mitosis.” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 34 (October): 109–15.

Tags: cancer signaling, contractility, epithelial mesenchymal transition, mitosis, stiffness

Posted on: 1 May 2019 , updated on: 3 May 2019

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.10412

Read preprint

(No Ratings Yet)

Author's response

Helen K. Matthews shared

Thank you for your summary and great suggestions.

One of the most exciting findings of this work for us is the discovery that even short-term activation of an oncogene (only 5 hours) affects how cells control their shape during mitosis. Understanding the molecular mechanism behind these changes is one of our key aims in following up this study. We think it is likely to involve multiple Ras-induced changes to downstream signaling pathways, cell morphology and actin organization in interphase and during mitotic rounding. Ras-induced alterations to Cdk1 activation during mitotic entry may play a part in these changes, as you suggest. We will certainly include this hypothesis in our investigations.

We find that Ras-expressing cells are softer than controls in interphase and therefore increase their stiffness more when they enter mitosis. This allows them to round up better under confinement. We do not yet understand how Ras functions to alter cell mechanics, but this is something we plan to address in our future work. Your suggested experiment of using STORM imaging to measure cortical thickness is a great one – it would be interesting to know whether Ras alters intrinsic features of the cortex such as thickness or actin filament organization and how this differs between interphase and mitosis. It would also be very interesting to study these effects in different contexts – for example, while single rounded cells soften following Ras activation, cells in an epithelium have been shown to stiffen (Gulleckson et al 2017).

Have your say Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Also in the cancer biology category:

Proteolysis-free cell migration through crowded environments via mechanical worrying

Meghan K. Driscoll, Erik S. Welf, Andrew Weems, et al.

Selected by

Jade Chan

Targeting a broad spectrum of KRAS-mutant cancers by hyperactivation-induced cell death

Johanna Lilja, Jasmin Kaivola, James R.W. Conway, et al.

Selected by

Yvonne Xinyi Lim

Dissecting aneuploidy phenotypes by constructing Sc2.0 chromosome VII and SCRaMbLEing synthetic disomic yeast

Yue Shen, Feng Gao, Yun Wang, et al.

Selected by

Grace Heredge Thomas

Also in the cell biology category:

Proteolysis-free cell migration through crowded environments via mechanical worrying

Meghan K. Driscoll, Erik S. Welf, Andrew Weems, et al.

Selected by

Jade Chan

An epigenetic barrier sets the timing of human neuronal maturation

Gabriele Ciceri, Hyunwoo Cho, Meghana Kshirsagar, et al.

Selected by

PiCLS Dundee

mTORC1 is required for differentiation of germline stem cells in the Drosophila melanogaster testis

Marie Clémot, Cecilia D’Alterio, Alexa Kwang, et al.

Selected by

Diego Sainz de la Maza

preLists in the cancer biology category:

Fibroblasts

The advances in fibroblast biology preList explores the recent discoveries and preprints of the fibroblast world. Get ready to immerse yourself with this list created for fibroblasts aficionados and lovers, and beyond. Here, my goal is to include preprints of fibroblast biology, heterogeneity, fate, extracellular matrix, behavior, topography, single-cell atlases, spatial transcriptomics, and their matrix!

Oncogenic signaling alters cell shape and mechanics to facilitate cell division under confinement

Share this:

Have your say Cancel reply

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Also in the cancer biology category:

Proteolysis-free cell migration through crowded environments via mechanical worrying

Targeting a broad spectrum of KRAS-mutant cancers by hyperactivation-induced cell death

Dissecting aneuploidy phenotypes by constructing Sc2.0 chromosome VII and SCRaMbLEing synthetic disomic yeast

Also in the cell biology category:

Proteolysis-free cell migration through crowded environments via mechanical worrying

An epigenetic barrier sets the timing of human neuronal maturation

mTORC1 is required for differentiation of germline stem cells in the Drosophila melanogaster testis

preLists in the cancer biology category:

Fibroblasts

Single Cell Biology 2020

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

Lung Disease and Regeneration

Anticancer agents: Discovery and clinical use

Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019

Also in the cell biology category:

Fibroblasts

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

FENS 2020

Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite

Cell Polarity

TAGC 2020

3D Gastruloids

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Autophagy

Lung Disease and Regeneration

Cellular metabolism

BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

MitoList

ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018