Sister-chromatid-sensitive Hi-C reveals the conformation of replicated human chromosomes

Michael Mitter, Catherina Gasser, Zsuzsanna Takacs, Christoph C. H. Langer, Wen Tang, Gregor Jessberger, Charlie T. Beales, Eva Neuner, Stefan L. Ameres, Jan-Michael Peters, Anton Goloborodko, Ronald Micura, Daniel W. Gerlich

Preprint posted on March 11, 2020

Now you can tell one twin (sister chromatid) from the other!

Selected by Parna Saha


A large body of work has highlighted the role of structural organization of the chromosomes in regulating biological processes using chromosome conformation capture techniques 1–3. Genome folding maps have provided unprecedented insights into how intra-molecular contacts between functional genomic elements shape the formation of topologically associated domains and transcriptional profiles in development and disease contexts. How this 3D genome architecture is rebuilt during each cell-cycle with extraordinary precision has also been studied 4,5. However, existing Hi-C techniques have failed to distinguish the topological interactions between sister chromatids of replicated chromosomes due to identical DNA sequences. In this preprint, the authors have devised an ingenious technique of labeling sister chromatids to study the inter and intra- molecular interactions of replicated chromosomes from G2 to M to the following G1 phase.

Key Findings:

Development of Scs-HiC

In this preprint, the authors introduced a sister chromatid specific label by culturing the cells (HeLa) in 4sT (4 thio-thymidine) – a DNA analog of 4 thio-uridine that is routinely used for labeling nascent RNAs. Following a similar principle, sister chromatid sensitive or scs-HiC  involves labeling the cells for a round of synchronized DNA replication; next,  Hi-C is performed and the 4sT label is converted to 5 methyl cytosine (5mC) by OsO4 / NH4Cl DNA extraction that allows the identification of generated signature mutations by high-throughput sequencing. Double -labeled reads (4sT specific mutation on both fragments of a pairwise contact) were classified as cis sister contacts if the label mapped to the same chromosomal DNA strands on both sides and trans if it mapped to different chromosomal strands on each side. Cells were analyzed progressing from G2 to M to G1 phase.

As predicted, upon mitotic entry as the sister chromatids resolve, the trans sister contacts dropped by 2-fold (23.7 % in G2 to 9.8% in M). In G phase, trans sister contacts should disappear as the daughter cell inherits only one labeled sister chromatid per homologous chromosome. Scs Hi-C showed the trans contacts were reduced to 2.7% in G1 phase, indicating that this technique can indeed enable mapping of sister chromatid interactions.

Figure 1: Schematic of Scs Hi-C a) Labeling of sister chromatids b) outline of scs Hi-C protocol. (From Mitter et al, 2020)


Conformations of sister chromatids at different phases of the cell-cycle

The authors go on to generate ScsHi-C maps that show TAD organization in the replicated chromosomes. In G2 phase, there are more trans sister chromatid contacts in comparison to the prometaphase TADs. This is in concordance with the fact that during interphase, replicated chromosomes contact each other to facilitate homology-dependent DNA repair and go on to disentangle as the cells proceed into mitosis. These trans sister chromatid contacts are highly structured and are enriched at the TAD boundaries. Cis sister contacts are enriched along the diagonal within the TADs mediating short range intra-molecular contacts. Trans sister contact frequency was used to define highly paired and unpaired TADs. Highly paired TADs are enriched for H3K27me3 marked facultative heterochromatin.

Molecular regulators of sister chromatid topologies

To study the role of two functionally distinct cohesin complexes 6,7,  cohesin that forms chromatin loops and cohesin responsible for sister chromatid cohesion, the cohesin loading factor that maintains cis-chromatin loops NIPBL and sister chromatid cohesion master regulator Soronin were depleted using auxin-inducible degron system at G2 phase. In NIPBL AID condition, cis sister contacts were substantially reduced but trans sister contacts were now abundant along the entire TADs and not so much at the boundaries. This indicates that this pool of cohesin is required for maintaining intra-chromatid loops, thereby separating sister chromatids at the TADs while locally enriching the chromatid cohesion at the TAD borders. On the other hand, Soronin AID results in reduction of trans sister contacts and loss of sister chromatid cohesion while the cis sister contacts remain comparable to the wild type cells. Thus, Soronin does not facilitate inter chromatid contacts but ensures that the sister chromatids are aligned during G2.

Figure 2: Changes in sister chromatid contacts upon depletion of NIPBL and Soronin-C (From Mitter et al , 2020)


Why I chose this preprint?

The principle of Scs Hi-C is simple and elegant. It can provide us with critical insights into how the replicated chromosomes behave during the cell cycle. In this preprint the authors have looked at the role of two essential factors, NIPBL and Soronin. However, future studies using this technique can unravel the role of other key molecular players involved in this process. I like the fact that this study brings to light the intricacies and differences of cis and trans sister chromatid contacts which so far have not been distinguishable. Beyond reporting their findings, the authors have also elaborated on the validation of the robustness of the technique which is a great resource for the community.

Future directions

Scs Hi-C has the potential to provide insights into many unanswered questions in the field of genome architecture. Future investigations shall provide insights into why certain regions are more prone to sister chromatid pairing than others and how does that dictate disease context involving chromosomal re-arrangements. Additionally, we shall also learn more about how chromatids resolve themselves as the cell enters mitosis. Scs Hi-C can be a great tool to study chromosome conformation in cases of aneuploidy, for example how chromosome interactions or TADs change in conditions like Down Syndrome.

Questions for the authors:

Have the authors looked deeper into the regions that participate in trans contacts of highly paired TADs? Could these regions be involved in mitotic bookmarking?

Is there any underlying sequence feature that promotes trans sister contacts?

What is the possible correlation between H3K37me3 and highly paired TADs? Also are highly paired TAD have any correlation with the gene density of the chromosomes.

Can the authors comment on the role of architectural proteins like CTCF if any in maintaining these sister contacts in the G2 phase?



  1. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science (80-. ). (2002) doi:10.1126/science.1067799.
  2. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science (80-. ). (2009) doi:10.1126/science.1181369.
  3. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
  4. Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948–53 (2013).
  5. Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. Nature (2019) doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1778-y.
  6. Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
  7. Rankin, S., Ayad, N. G. & Kirschner, M. W. Sororin, a substrate of the anaphase- promoting complex, is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates. Mol. Cell (2005) doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.017.


Posted on: 9th June 2020 , updated on: 11th June 2020


Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

  • Author's response

    Michael Mitter shared

    1) Have the authors looked deeper into the regions that participate in trans contacts of highly paired TADs? Could these regions be involved in mitotic bookmarking?

    We have indeed looked more closely into the highly paired domains and interestingly found that some of them exhibit an internal fine structure that also seems to be associated with H3K27me3. So not only does there seem to be a decision between pairing and not-pairing based on H3K27me3 state, but also a further structuring based on the extent of that modification throughout the TAD. As H3K27me3 has been associated with inheritance of chromatin state, it might very well be that these domains are involved in bookmarking and we are currently looking into that.

    2) Is there any underlying sequence feature that promotes trans sister contacts?

    As to whether there are any sequence features that promote trans-sister contacts, we found that CTCF motifs are highly enriched at trans-sister contact sites, but I think that is connected to the fact that TAD boundaries exhibit trans-sister pairing. It might however be interesting in the future to more systematically look at this!

    3)What is the possible correlation between H3K37me3 and highly paired TADs? Also, does highly paired TADs have any correlation with the gene density of the chromosomes?

    The connection of H3K27me3 with highly paired TADs is really interesting and I think we barely have scratched the surface there. There are many possible mechanisms that could explain this phenomenon: One could imagine that the inherent propensity of some polycomb proteins to form phase-separated structures could be involved. Another possibility could be that H3K27me3 chromatin interacts with cohesive cohesin in some way and that it gets stuck there. The latter would explain why the H3K27me3 domains seem much less pronounced upon degradation of sororin. In general, I like how H3K27me3 connects our findings with homology pairing in drosophila, a system where also two (or more) copies of a given chromosome are connected. It has been clear for some decades that polycomb proteins are involved in pairing-dependent silencing, most likely through mediating a connection between homologs. I find it very interesting to speculate that the polycomb system might be something evolution uses to mediate connection between chromosomes.

    4)Can the authors comment on the role of architectural proteins like CTCF, if any, in maintaining these sister contacts in the G2 phase?

    Since CTCF is strongly correlated with TAD boundaries, we find CTCF enriched when we search for proteins that are strongly associated with the high trans-sister connection. We think that through its role of acting as a road-block for loop extruding cohesin, it is involved in also positioning cohesive cohesin and therefore governing the position of trans-sister contacts.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    preLists in the cell biology category:

    FENS 2020

    A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020


    List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

    Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

    This preList contains preprints about the latest findings on Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) in various model organisms at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.


    List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

    BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite

    [under construction] Preprints presented at the (fully virtual) EMBL BioMalPar XVI, 17-18 May 2020 #emblmalaria


    List by Gautam Dey, Samantha Seah


    Cell Polarity

    Recent research from the field of cell polarity is summarized in this list of preprints. It comprises of studies focusing on various forms of cell polarity ranging from epithelial polarity, planar cell polarity to front-to-rear polarity.


    List by Yamini Ravichandran

    TAGC 2020

    Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20


    List by Maiko Kitaoka, Madhuja Samaddar, Miguel V. Almeida, Sejal Davla, Jennifer Ann Black, Gautam Dey

    3D Gastruloids

    A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells)


    List by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    ECFG15 – Fungal biology

    Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome


    List by Hiral Shah

    ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

    A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)


    List by Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka

    EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

    Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019


    List by Gautam Dey


    Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.


    List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Lung Disease and Regeneration

    This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.


    List by Rob Hynds

    Cellular metabolism

    A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.


    List by Pablo Ranea Robles

    BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

    Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019


    List by Gautam Dey


    This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.


    List by Sandra Franco Iborra

    Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019

    Few of the preprints that were discussed in the recent BPS annual meeting at Baltimore, USA


    List by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018

    This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.


    List by Gautam Dey, Amanda Haage