Menu

Close

The coordination of terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit is mediated through the regulation of chromatin accessibility

Yiqin Ma, Daniel J McKay, Laura Buttitta

Preprint posted on December 06, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/12/06/488387

Chromatin accessibility on the wing – insights into chromatin regulation of cell cycle exit

Selected by Gabriel Aughey

 

Background

The development of complex animal tissues requires the finely tuned expression of thousands of regulatory genes. Changes to underlying chromatin landscape are required to mediate the changes in gene expression necessary for fully differentiated tissues to arise. Consequently, chromatin landscapes are dynamic during development. Whilst it is commonly accepted that accessible or “open” chromatin is associated with regulatory elements that control gene expression, the full relationship between chromatin accessibility and development is incompletely understood.

Much work has been done on understanding the developmental programs that drive differentiation, however the question of how development is brought to a halt at the chromatin level (i.e. terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit) is less well understood. In this preprint, Ma et al. investigate the chromatin changes that accompany wing differentiation in Drosophila and uncover some surprising findings regarding the open chromatin at cell-cycle gene loci.

 

Key findings

Chromatin accessibility undergoes extensive changes concurrent with altered gene expression during wing development

Ma et al. initially set out to characterise the gene expression and chromatin accessibility profiles of Drosophila wing tissue at various timepoints during development. To achieve this, they conducted RNA-seq and FAIRE-seq at 6 developmental timepoints in the larval and pupal stages (with the final stage comprising post-mitotic differentiated cells). Unsurprisingly, the authors discovered both highly dynamic gene expression and chromatin accessibility landscapes during wing differentiation. Gene expression was correlated to chromatin accessibility and the majority of accessibility changes were observed to be associated with enhancers becoming activated. Importantly, cell-cycle genes were seen to have dynamic regions of open chromatin that correlated with known cell-cycle changes in the developing wing. The critical cell-cycle regulators CycE, stg and e2f1 all exhibited regions in which loss of chromatin accessibility was observed at cell-cycle exit.

 

Disruption of cell cycle has little impact on chromatin accessibility of cell cycle genes

Having confirmed that chromatin accessibility is correlated with cell-cycle gene expression at cell-cycle exit, the authors sought to understand whether the observed closing of chromatin was a function of cell-cycle exit, or a precursor to it. To answer this question cell cycles were artificially extended through the overexpression of E2F alone or E2F with cyclinD, resulting in either one extra cell division or several rounds of mitoses, respectively. Intriguingly, when wing tissue was profiled by RNA-seq and FAIRE-seq under these conditions, surprisingly few changes to chromatin accessibility were observed, despite extensive changes to gene expression. When several critical cell cycle regulator gene loci were examined in more detail in ectopically cycling tissue (e.g. CycE, stg), chromatin accessibility at putative enhancers was almost indistinguishable from postmitotic cells at the same timepoint (i.e. enhancers continue to be rendered inaccessible despite continued expression of the gene – see figure). This unusual finding suggests that the closing of chromatin is regulated by developmental cues that are not directly linked to the cell-cycle.

 

Fig.1. Chromatin accessibility at key cell-cycle regulator cyclinE remains unchanged when cell-cycles are artificially extended despite continued expression of the gene (Figure 4E-D in preprint).

 

Cell cycle disruption impacts accessibility of chromatin at terminal differentiation genes

Whilst changes to chromatin accessibility were not observed at cell cycle genes, the authors went on to show that a subset of genes involved in terminal differentiation displayed a loss of open chromatin when cell cycle exit was delayed compared to controls. These regions largely represented enhancers that were seen to open following cell-cycle exit rather than open regions that became closed as a result of continued cell-cycling. In contrast to the cell cycle genes, this correlated with changes in expression and ultimately resulted in cuticle formation phenotypes.

 

Why I like this preprint

I found this preprint appealing due to the comprehensive approach the authors have taken to characterise gene expression and chromatin accessibility, resulting in a window into wing development with impressive temporal resolution.

The finding that chromatin accessibility and cell-cycle can be decoupled is surprising and seems to fly in the face of conventional thinking. This new perspective may force us to rethink our ideas about how terminal differentiation is achieved.

 

Questions for the authors

If chromatin accessibility changes occur independently of cell cycles and are not sufficient to disrupt expression (i.e. CycE is expressed highly in bypassed G0 despite loss of chromatin accessibility – Fig4D), then what is the purpose of the chromatin closing?

Is it possible that the key enhancers for the expression of cell-cycle genes are located distally and act at long range, so are difficult to detect? (i.e. the proximal open chromatin regions observed to be unaffected are redundant with long range enhancers?)

Do you expect that there are changes occurring to histone modifications at cell-cycle loci at which chromatin accessibility appears unaffected by continued cell-cycles?

Do you have any ideas about how the developmental closing of cell cycle genes (i.e. CycE, stg) chromatin is programmed if not directly linked to cell cycle, and do you expect that this will be a conserved mechanism across cell types?

 

Tags: chromatin, development, drosophila

Posted on: 7th January 2019

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Author's response

    Laura, Yiqin and Dan shared

    If chromatin accessibility changes occur independently of cell cycles and are not sufficient to disrupt expression (i.e. CycE is expressed highly in bypassed G0 despite loss of chromatin accessibility – Fig4D), then what is the purpose of the chromatin closing?

     Our hypothesis is that the closing of chromatin at distal enhancers for key cell cycle regulators limits the ability of developmental signaling pathways to induce proliferation in the differentiating wing. For example, the closing enhancers that we verified drive expression of cycE and stg in the pupa wing, contain known binding sites for the Notch effector Su(H) and Yorkie/Scalloped (Yki/Sd), the downstream effector inhibited by Hippo signaling. We propose that closing of these enhancers allows pathways such as Notch and Hippo to be re-used to perform other postmitotic functions in the late wing without reactivating cell cycle genes or proliferation. Indeed, we know from our previous studies that Notch signaling and even Yorkie activation are unable to promote continued proliferation in the late pupa wing, despite promoting extensive proliferation at earlier stages. We believe the closing of the enhancers containing SuH and Yki/Sd binding sites at cycE and stg, at least in part, explains this puzzling result.

     

    In our experiments to compromise cell cycle exit, we are using very specific combinations of cell cycle regulators such as direct overexpression of E2F and CycD/Cdk4. We use these combinations because they are the only tools we know of that can prevent cell cycle exit at late stages without preventing terminal differentiation (and we have tested many, many pathways and combinations over the years). In these experiments we believe we are bypassing the distal enhancers and re-activating expression through promoter proximal regulatory elements, that remain accessible, but may not be the normal enhancers used in the pupa wing. It is worth noting there may also be a role for the number of enhancers that close in determining the robustness of silencing during cell cycle exit. For example, cycE only has one closing enhancer and can be readily reactivated by ectopic E2F activity postmitotically, while stg has multiple enhancers closing and requires additional CycD/Cdk4 activity to overcome the barrier to re-expression.

     

    Is it possible that the key enhancers for the expression of cell-cycle genes are located distally and act at long range, so are difficult to detect? (i.e. the proximal open chromatin regions observed to be unaffected are redundant with long range enhancers?)

    Absolutely this could be true. In the preprint we validate that some of the putative enhancers are sufficient to drive expression in the pupa wing, but we have many, many more to test and none of the enhancers we have examined thus far are sufficient to fully recapitulate endogenous expression. There is a lot of work ahead on this project. We would like to make overlapping deletion constructs and potentially use CRISPR to test redundancy of some of these putative regulatory elements. Now that we have a map of the potential pupa wing enhancers we are finally in a position to begin figuring out their logic.

     

    Do you expect that there are changes occurring to histone modifications at cell-cycle loci at which chromatin accessibility appears unaffected by continued cell-cycles?

    Yes. For many of the downstream cell cycle genes with simple enhancers that do not exhibit chromatin closing, we expect that the accessible regions proximal to the promoter bind the dREAM (RB/E2F) repressive complex leading to repressive histone modifications. When we disrupt this complex by flooding the system with ectopic E2F, this leads to activator E2F complexes binding in the same accessible regions, and subsequent recruitment of histone modifiers that help activate expression.

     

    Do you have any ideas about how the developmental closing of cell cycle genes (i.e. CycE, stg) chromatin is programmed if not directly linked to cell cycle, and do you expect that this will be a conserved mechanism across cell types?

    Our hypothesis is that the major developmental cue driving cell cycle exit and chromatin closing is ecdysone signaling, either directly or indirectly. Our previous work has shown a clear role for ecdysone signaling in promoting cell cycle exit in the wing and we have shown that ecdysone targets such as the transcription factor E93 dramatically remodel chromatin accessibility in the pupa wing.

    Based upon our preliminary data, we expect a similar pathway is at play in multiple tissues and cell types that exhibit robust cell cycle exit at the same timepoints we examined in the pupa. These include certain cell types in the eye and brain, as well as the legs and haltere. Importantly, while ecdysone seems to promote cell cycle exit in these cell types in the pupa, other cell types such as the abdominal histoblasts respond to ecdysone quite differently, and instead trigger proliferation during pupa stages. We therefore think there are common mechanisms at play in a subset of cell types, but there must be additional mechanisms at play that can alter the response to the same hormone differently in cells that proliferate in the pupa.  We believe the way forward to resolve this conundrum is to figure out the identity of the chromatin remodeler involved in chromatin closing at cell cycle genes, and how it may be regulated in a tissue-specific and cell type specific manner by ecdysone signaling.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the developmental biology category:

    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.



    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Planar differential growth rates determine the position of folds in complex epithelia

    Melda Tozluoğlu, Maria Duda, Natalie J Kirkland, et al.

    AND

    Buckling of epithelium growing under spherical confinement

    Anastasiya Trushko, Ilaria Di Meglio, Aziza Merzouki, et al.



    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    2

    Establishment of the mayfly Cloeon dipterum as a new model system to investigate insect evolution

    Isabel Almudi, Carlos Martin-Blanco, Isabel Maria Garcia-Fernandez, et al.



    Selected by Ivan Candido-Ferreira

    1

    The Spatio-Temporal Control of Zygotic Genome Activation

    George Gentsch, Nick D. L. Owens, James C. Smith



    Selected by Meng Zhu

    Microtubules stabilize intercellular contractile force transmission during tissue folding



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development

    Cornelia Fritsch, F. Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Tim Humberg, et al.



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation

    Caleb Weinreb, Alejo E Rodriguez-Fraticelli, Fernando D Camargo, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    1

    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    A direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila

    Christopher M Uyehara, Daniel J McKay



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    A metabolic switch from OXPHOS to glycolysis is essential for cardiomyocyte proliferation in the regenerating heart

    Hessel Honkoop, Dennis de Bakker, Alla Aharonov, et al.



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    1

    Reconstruction of the global neural crest gene regulatory network in vivo

    Ruth M Williams, Ivan Candido-Ferreira, Emmanouela Repapi, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Functional characterization of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE 3 in reproductive tissue

    Pauline E Jullien, Stefan Grob, Antonin Marchais, et al.



    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra

    1

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    2

    Force inference predicts local and tissue-scale stress patterns in epithelia

    Weiyuan Kong, Olivier Loison, Pruthvi Chavadimane Shivakumar, et al.



    Selected by Sundar Naganathan

    Also in the genetics category:

    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.



    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    Kinesin-6 Klp9 plays motor-dependent and -independent roles in collaboration with Kinesin-5 Cut7 and the microtubule crosslinker Ase1 in fission yeast

    Masashi Yukawa, Masaki Okazaki, Yasuhiro Teratani, et al.



    Selected by I. Bouhlel

    Human Handedness: Genetics, Microtubules, Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Brain Language Areas

    Akira Wiberg, Gwenaelle Douaud, Michael Ng, et al.



    Selected by Jose Guerrero

    The Spatio-Temporal Control of Zygotic Genome Activation

    George Gentsch, Nick D. L. Owens, James C. Smith



    Selected by Meng Zhu

    Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development

    Cornelia Fritsch, F. Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Tim Humberg, et al.



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    A direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila

    Christopher M Uyehara, Daniel J McKay



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

    Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, et al.



    Selected by Katie Weiner

    1

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    2

    The coordination of terminal differentiation and cell cycle exit is mediated through the regulation of chromatin accessibility

    Yiqin Ma, Daniel J McKay, Laura Buttitta



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Ribosomal DNA and the rDNA-binding protein Indra mediate non-random sister chromatid segregation in Drosophila male germline stem cells

    George Watase, Yukiko Yamashita



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    A non-canonical arm of UPRER mediates longevity through ER remodeling and lipophagy.

    Joseph R Daniele, Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria, Vidhya Ramachandran, et al.



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Psychiatric risk gene NT5C2 regulates protein translation in human neural progenitor cells

    Rodrigo R.R. Duarte, Nathaniel D. Bachtel, Marie-Caroline Cotel, et al.



    Selected by Joanna Cross

    The Toll pathway inhibits tissue growth and regulates cell fitness in an infection-dependent manner

    Federico Germani, Daniel Hain, Denise Sternlicht, et al.



    Selected by Rohan Khadilkar

    Rapid embryonic cell cycles defer the establishment of heterochromatin by Eggless/SetDB1 in Drosophila

    Charles A Seller, Chun-Yi Cho, Patrick H O'Farrell



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    Also in the molecular biology category:

    Optical determination of absolute membrane potential

    Julia R. Lazzari-Dean, Anneliese M.M. Gest, Evan Miller



    Selected by James Marchant

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high resolution cryo-EM

    Claudio Schmidli, Stefan Albiez, Luca Rima, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    1

    Structures of the Otopetrin Proton Channels Otop1 and Otop3

    Kei Saotome, Bochuan Teng, Che Chun (Alex) Tsui, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    Central spindle microtubules are strongly coupled to chromosomes during both anaphase A and anaphase B

    Che-Hang Yu, Stefanie Redemann, Hai-Yin Wu, et al.



    Selected by Federico Pelisch

    1

    Cell growth dilutes the cell cycle inhibitor Rb to trigger cell division

    Evgeny Zatulovskiy, Daniel F. Berenson, Benjamin R. Topacio, et al.



    Selected by Zaki Ahmad

    1

    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.



    Selected by Mila Basic

    Bacteriophage resistance alters antibiotic mediated intestinal expansion of enterococci

    Anushila Chatterjee, Cydney N Johnson, Phat Luong, et al.



    Selected by Yasmin Lau

    On-site ribosome remodeling by locally synthesized ribosomal proteins in axons

    Toshiaki Shigeoka, Max Koppers, Hovy Ho-Wai Wong, et al.



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

    Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, et al.



    Selected by Katie Weiner

    1

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Unlimited genetic switches for cell-type specific manipulation

    Jorge Garcia-Marques, Ching-Po Yang, Isabel Espinosa-Medina, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Almeida

    1

    Stable knockout and complementation of receptor expression using in vitro cell line derived reticulocytes for dissection of host malaria invasion requirements

    Timothy J Satchwell, Katherine E Wright, Katy L Haydn-Smith, et al.



    Selected by Alyson Smith
    Close