Close

Frictiotaxis underlies adhesion-independent durotaxis

Adam Shellard, Peter A. E. Hampshire, Namid R. Stillman, Christina Dix, Richard Thorogate, Albane Imbert, Guillaume Charras, Ricard Alert, Roberto Mayor

Posted on: 3 July 2023

Preprint posted on 1 June 2023

These cells are made for walking, up a friction-gradient they move, One of these days these cells are gonna crawl away from you

Selected by Girish Kale

Background:

Cell motility is a complex process, and as such, there are several factors that one needs to consider when thinking about it. First of all, whether cells have the innate ability to move or not: most cells do, but there is a huge variability. Then, what kind of motility the cells are capable of: do they move like an amoeba, or do they use specific anchorage to a surface. Going even further, what is the environment of cells: is it a 2D or a 3D environment, and can cells move without restrictions or do they need to squeeze through confined spaces. On top of all this, what sort of cues/signals do cells use to find their way: are these soluble chemical signals (chemotaxis), surface bound chemical signals (haptotaxis), or is it a difference in stiffness (durotaxis).

Broadly speaking, we can use the above points to describe cell motility, a feature analogous to crawling, walking, or running. Here, we are not even talking about cells using specialized structures, like a flagellum, which they can use for swimming in a medium, or cells using cues such as a source of light (phototaxis) to guide themselves. So, where does this preprint fit into all this?

The study described in this preprint focuses on motility along surfaces. Cells are known to use durotaxis in such environments, which requires strong and specific attachment to the surface, which in turn is required to “sense” the difference in surface stiffness across the length of the cell. As the authors mention, this would preclude durotaxis in cells that use amoeboid movement, i.e., cells which are not capable of producing specific surface attachments. In this preprint the authors decided to challenge this view and asked, can cells sense surface stiffness without specific surface attachments, and if so, how?

Key findings:

One of the first points the authors make in this preprint is that it was challenging to “fabricate confined cellular environments of tunable stiffness that are necessary to study adhesion-independent migration” in 3D. So, the authors devised a microchannel setup, made of agarose gel, which can be tuned to have “substrates of physiologically relevant stiffnesses”, where the channel is wide enough for the cell to crawl through without difficulty, while being narrow enough to produce the effect of confinement. This setup also produced a gradient of stiffness along the length of the microchannel to test durotaxis.

Passivating the microchannel with polyethylene glycol (PEG) prevented cells from producing specific surface adhesion, and the authors used this treatment to assess durotaxis while the experimental cell lines performed amoeboid motility. The authors could show that cells move up the stiffness gradient, and confirmed that this occurred without a specific adhesion, seeing the absence of Paxillin staining which labels focal adhesion structures. The authors noted that cells entering the microchannel with a stiffness gradient showed greater persistence in their movement up the stiffness gradient; while cells entering a microchannel without stiffness gradient showed a tendency to move back-and-forth, as if they couldn’t “decide” which way to go.

Having shown that cells can durotax without specific adhesion to the substrate, the authors wondered how this was possible. One possibility they considered was that the effect was only correlative and not causal. They hypothesized that cells were, in fact, sensing the friction along the surface, given that the surface friction and substrate stiffness would be correlated. They formally tested this correlation using ‘lateral force microscopy’ (LFM), allowing frictional forces to be measured. This is analogous to dragging a stick over a surface to guess how slippery vs. sticky the surface is.

At this point, the authors introduced a mathematical model to describe how cell motility can be achieved using a friction gradient. The amoeboid movement of a cell relies on movement of the actomyosin meshwork: the actomyosin meshwork flows to the rear end of the cell, “squeezes” the cell there, propeling the other end of the cell forward, and the cycle repeats in a loop as long as the cell keeps moving. At the beginning of such movement, when the front or rear end is not specified, different parts of the cell will compete to be the next rear end, and whichever part wins will propel the cell towards the front. The tie breaker, in this case, is the flow of actomyosin. In the model described by the authors, friction will dictate which side of the cell will have slower flow, making that side the front, and thus indirectly specifying which side will be the rear end. Cells thus move up a stiffness/friction gradient, due to the influence of friction outside the cell, on the actomyosin flow inside the cell.

The prediction of the model was clear: if a cell is given a friction gradient, it will sense it and move up the gradient. The authors coated the surface of the microchannel with opposing surface gradients of PEG (passive non-sticky substance) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) (non-specific sticky substance) to produce microchannels with friction gradients, and duly characterized this gradient using the LFM. When cells entered the microchannel, they moved up the friction gradient: demonstrating “frictiotaxis”, for the first time.

Importance of the findings:

Identifying the environmental cues that guide cell motility has been a long-standing research interest. This preprint demonstrates, for the first time, that cells are capable of sensing the difference in surface friction, at a length-scale comparable to cell dimensions, to guide their motility. Given that the substrate stiffness and surface friction are correlated, various tissues present different stiffness in vivo, and the experiments use a physiologically relevant stiffness range, it is likely that cells use frictiotaxis under physiological conditions as well.

The authors highlight some open questions in the field: it remains unclear how cells prioritize and integrate various environmental cues to regulate their motility and find their target. This is like going on a treasure hunt, with a lot of clues, but without knowing which are the useful ones. Stretching the analogy even further, the clues might be present in a “language” that we might not even understand, and it is interesting to figure out if there are differences in the capacity of cells to interpret the clues in different “languages”, or if cells simply ignore some clues, and are biased towards some other ones. The authors argue that immune cells are a promising candidate for using frictiotaxis, as they “often need to traverse tissues of high density to reach target sites. Adhesion-independent durotaxis could contribute significantly to this type of directed migration”. Having tested the adhesion-independent durotaxis in the ‘HL60 neutrophil-like cells’, this manuscript takes the first steps towards testing the importance of durotaxis in immune cells’ motility in vivo.

Questions to authors:

1) In your experiments, the cells move up a friction/stiffness gradient in microchannels, i.e., in a 3D environment. It is likely that the cells are able to produce strong enough forces perpendicular to the surface to generate frictional forces, but only if they are in a 3D environment. In this context, what is the role of confined environment in frictiotaxis? Would the model of frictiotaxis predict that a cell would similarly movement up a friction/stiffness gradient if it were on a 2D surface?

2) It is clear that ‘frictiotaxis’ is ‘adhesion-independent durotaxis’. But, what do you think would be the difference between ‘frictiotaxis’ and ‘adhesion-independent haptotaxis’, as both require a gradient of surface bound molecules?

3) From what I understand, tumors typically have greater stiffness than the neighbouring tissue. In such a scenario, would you predict that durotaxis or frictiotaxis is trying to prevent tumor metastasis? Would you imagine that cancerous cells would need to overcome this barrier, and the other migration cues need to be strong enough for the cells to migrate out of the tumor?

Tags: cell motility, durotaxis, frictiotaxis, micro-fabrication, neutrophil-like cells

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.34966

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)

Author's response

The author team shared

1) Confinement is often a condition for amoeboid migration. It can play a few roles: First, confinement can compress a cell and potentially increase its cortical tension. Second, confining a cell provides multiple surfaces against which the cell can exert friction forces, which promotes amoeboid migration and therefore also frictiotaxis. The model, however, does not really require confinement. On a 2D surface with a friction gradient, the cell would also experience differential actomyosin flow along the gradient. Therefore, in principle, the cell should be able to perform frictiotaxis even on 2D surfaces. Whether this happens in practice is an open question.

2) We would say that frictiotaxis and adhesion-independent durotaxis are two related but different phenomena. For example, we show that cells perform frictiotaxis even on substrates with uniform stiffness. In that case, there is no durotaxis; just frictiotaxis. In our experiments, stiffness and friction are correlated, and hence cells can perform adhesion-independent durotaxis by actually performing frictiotaxis. So here, frictiotaxis underlies adhesion-independent durotaxis.

Regarding the relation to haptotaxis, there are a few differences. First, frictiotaxis does not really require a gradient of surface molecule concentration. It requires a friction gradient, which can be achieved in different ways: one of them is through a gradient of surface molecule concentration as in our experiments, but another one could be a gradient in surface roughness, for example. In the case of roughness, there is a clear difference with haptotaxis. Second, haptotaxis involves the sensing of a chemical cue via specific receptors, whereas frictiotaxis relies on a physical cue, which requires no specific molecular sensor.

3) This is possible, and it would be interesting to investigate this hypothesis. However, cancer cells also modify their focal-adhesion dynamics and reinforcement, which could also allow them to perform anti-durotaxis to migrate away from the tumor.

Have your say

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Register here

Also in the biophysics category:

Motor Clustering Enhances Kinesin-driven Vesicle Transport

Rui Jiang, Qingzhou Feng, Daguan Nong, et al.

Selected by 16 November 2024

Sharvari Pitke

Biophysics

Global coordination of protrusive forces in migrating immune cells

Patricia Reis-Rodrigues, Nikola Canigova, Mario J. Avellaneda, et al.

Selected by 10 October 2024

yohalie kalukula

Biophysics

Engineered Nanotopographies Induce Transient Openings in the Nuclear Membrane

Einollah Sarikhani, Vrund Patel, Zhi Li, et al.

Selected by 23 September 2024

Sristilekha Nath

Bioengineering

Also in the cell biology category:

Platelet-derived LPA16:0 inhibits adult neurogenesis and stress resilience in anxiety disorder

Thomas Larrieu, Charline Carron, Fabio Grieco, et al.

Selected by 04 December 2024

Harvey Roweth

Neuroscience

Investigating Mechanically Activated Currents from Trigeminal Neurons of Non-Human Primates

Karen A Lindquist, Jennifer Mecklenburg, Anahit H. Hovhannisyan, et al.

Selected by 04 December 2024

Vanessa Ehlers

Neuroscience

Motor Clustering Enhances Kinesin-driven Vesicle Transport

Rui Jiang, Qingzhou Feng, Daguan Nong, et al.

Selected by 16 November 2024

Sharvari Pitke

Biophysics

Also in the immunology category:

Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Brain Extracts Induce Multiple Pathologies in Vascularized Neuroimmune Organoids for Disease Modeling and Drug Discovery

Yanru Ji, Xiaoling Chen, Meek Connor Joseph, et al.

Selected by 07 November 2024

Manuel Lessi

Neuroscience

Global coordination of protrusive forces in migrating immune cells

Patricia Reis-Rodrigues, Nikola Canigova, Mario J. Avellaneda, et al.

Selected by 10 October 2024

yohalie kalukula

Biophysics

Integrin conformation-dependent neutrophil slowing obstructs the capillaries of the pre-metastatic lung in a model of breast cancer

Frédéric Fercoq, Gemma S. Cairns, Marco De Donatis, et al.

Selected by 07 October 2024

Simon Cleary

Cancer Biology

Also in the cell biology category:

November in preprints – the CellBio edition

This is the first community-driven preList! A group of preLighters, with expertise in different areas of cell biology, have worked together to create this preprint reading lists for researchers with an interest in cell biology. Categories include: 1) cancer cell biology 2) cell cycle and division 3) cell migration and cytoskeleton 4) cell organelles and organisation 5) cell signalling and mechanosensing 6) genetics/gene expression

 



List by Felipe Del Valle Batalla et al.

BSCB-Biochemical Society 2024 Cell Migration meeting

This preList features preprints that were discussed and presented during the BSCB-Biochemical Society 2024 Cell Migration meeting in Birmingham, UK in April 2024. Kindly put together by Sara Morais da Silva, Reviews Editor at Journal of Cell Science.

 



List by Reinier Prosee

‘In preprints’ from Development 2022-2023

A list of the preprints featured in Development's 'In preprints' articles between 2022-2023

 



List by Alex Eve, Katherine Brown

preLights peer support – preprints of interest

This is a preprint repository to organise the preprints and preLights covered through the 'preLights peer support' initiative.

 



List by preLights peer support

The Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting

This preList is made up of the preprints discussed during the Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting that took place in Chicago in July 2023.

 



List by Joyce Yu, Katherine Brown

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Preprints mentioned by speakers at the #CSHLsymp23

 



List by Alex Eve

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

This preList highlights the preprints discussed at the JCS meeting 'Imaging Cell Dynamics'. The meeting was held from 14 - 17 May 2023 in Lisbon, Portugal and was organised by Erika Holzbaur, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Rob Parton and Michael Way.

 



List by Helen Zenner

9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination

This preList contains preprints discussed during the 9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination. This conference was held in Kona, Hawaii from April 17th to 21st 2023.

 



List by Martin Estermann

Alumni picks – preLights 5th Birthday

This preList contains preprints that were picked and highlighted by preLights Alumni - an initiative that was set up to mark preLights 5th birthday. More entries will follow throughout February and March 2023.

 



List by Sergio Menchero et al.

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

This preLists features preprints that were discussed and presented during the CellBio 2022 meeting in Washington, DC in December 2022.

 



List by Nadja Hümpfer et al.

Fibroblasts

The advances in fibroblast biology preList explores the recent discoveries and preprints of the fibroblast world. Get ready to immerse yourself with this list created for fibroblasts aficionados and lovers, and beyond. Here, my goal is to include preprints of fibroblast biology, heterogeneity, fate, extracellular matrix, behavior, topography, single-cell atlases, spatial transcriptomics, and their matrix!

 



List by Osvaldo Contreras

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

A list of preprints mentioned at the #EESmorphoG virtual meeting in 2021.

 



List by Alex Eve

FENS 2020

A collection of preprints presented during the virtual meeting of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS) in 2020

 



List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

This preList contains preprints about the latest findings on Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) in various model organisms at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels.

 



List by Ana Dorrego-Rivas

BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite

[under construction] Preprints presented at the (fully virtual) EMBL BioMalPar XVI, 17-18 May 2020 #emblmalaria

 



List by Dey Lab, Samantha Seah

1

Cell Polarity

Recent research from the field of cell polarity is summarized in this list of preprints. It comprises of studies focusing on various forms of cell polarity ranging from epithelial polarity, planar cell polarity to front-to-rear polarity.

 



List by Yamini Ravichandran

TAGC 2020

Preprints recently presented at the virtual Allied Genetics Conference, April 22-26, 2020. #TAGC20

 



List by Maiko Kitaoka et al.

3D Gastruloids

A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells). Updated until July 2021.

 



List by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome

 



List by Hiral Shah

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

 



List by Madhuja Samaddar et al.

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019

 



List by Dey Lab

Autophagy

Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.

 



List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

Lung Disease and Regeneration

This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.

 



List by Rob Hynds

Cellular metabolism

A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.

 



List by Pablo Ranea Robles

BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

 



List by Dey Lab

MitoList

This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.

 



List by Sandra Franco Iborra

ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018

This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.

 



List by Dey Lab, Amanda Haage

Also in the immunology category:

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

This preList highlights the preprints discussed at the JCS meeting 'Imaging Cell Dynamics'. The meeting was held from 14 - 17 May 2023 in Lisbon, Portugal and was organised by Erika Holzbaur, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Rob Parton and Michael Way.

 



List by Helen Zenner

Fibroblasts

The advances in fibroblast biology preList explores the recent discoveries and preprints of the fibroblast world. Get ready to immerse yourself with this list created for fibroblasts aficionados and lovers, and beyond. Here, my goal is to include preprints of fibroblast biology, heterogeneity, fate, extracellular matrix, behavior, topography, single-cell atlases, spatial transcriptomics, and their matrix!

 



List by Osvaldo Contreras

Single Cell Biology 2020

A list of preprints mentioned at the Wellcome Genome Campus Single Cell Biology 2020 meeting.

 



List by Alex Eve

Autophagy

Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.

 



List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

Antimicrobials: Discovery, clinical use, and development of resistance

Preprints that describe the discovery of new antimicrobials and any improvements made regarding their clinical use. Includes preprints that detail the factors affecting antimicrobial selection and the development of antimicrobial resistance.

 



List by Zhang-He Goh

Zebrafish immunology

A compilation of cutting-edge research that uses the zebrafish as a model system to elucidate novel immunological mechanisms in health and disease.

 



List by Shikha Nayar
Close