Menu

Close

Spatiotemporally controlled Myosin relocalization and internal pressure cause biased cortical extension to generate sibling cell size asymmetry

Tri Thanh Pham, Arnaud Monnard, Jonne Helenius, Erik Lund, Nicole Lee, Daniel Mueller, Clemens Cabernard

Preprint posted on May 01, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/01/311852

The right cell at the right size: how myosin-dependent tension and hydrostatic pressure coordinate to achieve physical asymmetry.

Selected by Giuliana Clemente

Categories: cell biology

Context and Background:

Cells of a developing organism can undergo either symmetric or asymmetric cell division. Upon symmetric cell division, the dividing cell generates two daughters of identical fate and size. Asymmetric cell division is a peculiar trait of stem cells and it serves both, self-renewal as well as lineage commitment and differentiation. In the context of cell division, asymmetry is generally meant as asymmetric inheritance of cell fate determinants or as a difference in the type and strength of signal(s) received from the niche. Furthermore, this form of division is often accompanied by asymmetry in cell size.

Drosophila Neuroblasts (NBs) represent a well-established system to study asymmetric stem cell division. These are large cells that repetitively divide to generate another self-renewing neuroblast and a smaller progenitor known as Ganglion Mother Cell (GMC). Neuroblasts generate cell-fate asymmetry by the establishment of a robust polarity axis. The generation of the polarity cues allows the cells to segregate fate determinants to the basal side, ensuring their subsequent inheritance by the future GMC. How cell size asymmetry is generated in the system is still somewhat elusive. Some evidence suggests that an apical-to-basal flow of Myosin-II provides a mean to generate unequally sized daughter cells (Cabernard et al, 2010; Connel et al. 2011; Ou et al. 2010). However it is still unclear by which mechanism Myosin-II promotes physical asymmetry and whether other forces acting on the system contribute to the outcome.

Key findings:

Pham et al. combine atomic force microscopy with the amenability and genetic power of Drosophila and suggest a multi-step model in which coordinated and dynamic changes in cortical tension and hydrostatic pressure direct apical membrane expansion and basal constriction, resulting in sibling size asymmetry (Figure 1). Specifically, they propose that an increase in internal pressure accompanied by a reduction in apical cortical tension drives apical expansion. At the onset of anaphase, once the internal pressure levels drastically reduce to basal level, a contractile ring forms shifted toward the basal side. This basal constriction starts basal membrane expansion and supports apical expansion as well.

 

Figure1: Proposed working model adopted from Figure 4 of the preprint.

 

Why I chose this paper:

Are cells smart entities able to receive, interpret and integrate multiple signals and tune their response accordingly? The question of cell intelligence is the big mystery that has been fascinating scientists for decades. How do cells know their relationship with the external environment? How are they able to travel long distances and get to the right place at the right time? Similarly, how do cells know what their right size should be in relation with the outer space and how do they tune their size during growth and division?

I chose the work from Pham and colleagues as they aim to address this latter question by trying to set a molecular base to the establishment of sibling cell asymmetry. This is physiologically relevant especially in the stem cell field, where keeping the right size ratio between the two daughter cells is crucial for cell specification and determination (Ou et al., 2010).

Questions for the Authors:

As the authors mention in the discussion, there is still space for a better characterisation of the process. The model indeed does not explain how internal pressure increases and whether this is under cell-cycle control. Another question would be: what is the membrane reservoir? Is new membrane delivered asymmetrically or asymmetric lipid distribution is achieved lately through the activity of the acto-myosin ring?

This area of research is undoubtedly expanding. In fact, on a smaller scale, one could ask how do cells know the size of their organelles? And by what molecular mechanisms do they control it? In this regard a good example has been recently offered by the Raff lab that published about regulation of centriole size and identified in Plk-4 the “homeostatic clock” which sets the time and rate of centriole growth (Aydogan M. G. et al., 2018).

References:

1. Cabernard, C., Prehoda, K.E., Doe, C.Q., 2010. A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning

pathway. Nature 467, 91–94. doi:10.1038/nature09334

2. Connell, M., Cabernard, C., Ricketson, D., Doe, C.Q., Prehoda, K.E., 2011. Asymmetric cortical

extension shifts cleavage furrow position in Drosophila neuroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4220–4226

doi:10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0173

3. Ou, G., Stuurman, N., D’Ambrosio, M., Vale, R.D., 2010. Polarized myosin produces unequal-size

daughters during asymmetric cell division. Science 330, 677–680. doi:10.1126/science.1196112

4. Mustafa G. Aydogan, ProAlan WainmanSaroj Saurya, Thomas L. Steinacker, Anna Caballe, Zsofia A. Novak, Janina Baumbach, Nadine Muschalik, Jordan W. Raff. A homeostatic clock sets daughter centriole size in flies. Journal of Cell Biology 217 (4), 1233-1248. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201801014

 

 

 

Posted on: 24th June 2018 , updated on: 25th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Central spindle microtubules are strongly coupled to chromosomes during both anaphase A and anaphase B

    Che-Hang Yu, Stefanie Redemann, Hai-Yin Wu, et al.



    Selected by Federico Pelisch

    1

    Cell growth dilutes the cell cycle inhibitor Rb to trigger cell division

    Evgeny Zatulovskiy, Daniel F. Berenson, Benjamin R. Topacio, et al.



    Selected by Zaki Ahmad

    1

    Minimal membrane interactions conferred by Rheb C-terminal farnesylation are essential for mTORC1 activation

    Shawn M Ferguson, Brittany Angarola



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Mechanical Stretch Kills Transformed Cancer Cells

    Ajay Tijore, Mingxi Yao, Yu-Hsiu Wang, et al.



    Selected by Vibha SINGH

    EHD2-mediated restriction of caveolar dynamics regulates cellular lipid uptake

    Claudia Matthaeus, Ines Lahmann, Severine Kunz, et al.



    Selected by Andreas Müller

    1

    Mechanical Stretch Kills Transformed Cancer Cells

    Ajay Tijore, Mingxi Yao, Yu-Hsiu Wang, et al.



    Selected by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.



    Selected by Mila Basic

    A metabolic switch from OXPHOS to glycolysis is essential for cardiomyocyte proliferation in the regenerating heart

    Hessel Honkoop, Dennis de Bakker, Alla Aharonov, et al.



    Selected by Andreas van Impel

    1

    S-acylated Golga7b stabilises DHHC5 at the plasma membrane to regulate desmosome assembly and cell adhesion.

    Keith T Woodley, Mark O Collins



    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne

    3

    A complex containing lysine-acetylated actin inhibits the formin INF2

    Mu A, Tak Shun Fung, Arminja N. Kettenbach, et al.



    Selected by Laura McCormick

    1

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    1

    Actomyosin-II facilitates long-range retrograde transport of large cargoes by controlling axonal radial contractility

    Tong Wang, Wei Li, Sally Martin, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer



    Selected by Romain F. Laine
    Close