Mechanosensitive dynamics of lysosomes regulates the emergence of leader cells during collective cell migration

Background

Processes such as wound healing and organogenesis are critically dependent on the organised motion of cell clusters, termed collective cell migration¹. During migration, a few cells at the outermost margin transform into leader cells with actin-rich lamellipodia^{1, 2}. Leader cells are responsible for guiding followers to distant sites^{1, 2}. The importance of leader cells in successful tissue development and wound healing is clear, but how do leaders emerge from a seemingly homogeneous mass of cells?

Previous studies have identified signaling proteins such as p53, Rho GTPases, and p120 catenin as markers of leader cells that distinguish them from followers^3-6. Beyond these biochemical signatures, physical forces arising from cell-cell or cell-substrate interactions experienced by collectively moving cells appear to be influential in the acquisition of leader cell identity^{7, 8}. However, how these diverse cues are integrated to promote leaders from followers remains to be solved.

Prior studies have emphasized the importance of dynamic rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton during the adoption of leader cell identity^{7, 8}. In contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to how cellular organelles are reorganized in leader cells. Aside from their established role in breaking down macromolecules, lysosomes have emerged as key players in cell motility. Studies suggest that spatial reorganization of lysosomes underlies migration of single fibroblasts and dendritic cells^{5, 9}, but their role in collective migration is unknown.

Using a combination of live-cell imaging, optogenetics, and micropatterning, the authors uncovered a novel role of lysosomes in leader cells during collective cell migration. In epithelial monolayers and Drosophila embryos, they demonstrate that lysosomes amass at the cell periphery in cells located at the migrating front. This peripheral relocalization occurs before development of lamellipodia and blocking lysosomal relocalization disrupts leader cell emergence. Overall, the authors present a surprising role of lysosomes as integrators of biochemical and physical cues in leader cells.

Key Findings

Lysosomes accumulate peripherally in leader cells

To visualize lysosomes during collective cell migration, the authors grew MDCK or EpH4 epithelial cells to confluence inside migration chambers with removable inserts. These cells undergo collective migration after their confinement has been lifted. Immunostaining with lysosomal marker LAMP1 at different time points revealed peripheral accumulation of lysosomes in marginal cells. This accumulation was only observed in marginal cells, whereas lysosomes were present throughout the cytoplasm of follower cells. The peripheral occupancy of lysosomes (POL) was even greater in leader cells, which could be distinguished from marginal cells by the presence of lamellipodia.

To determine whether peripheral accumulation of lysosomes is conserved in vivo, the authors used a wound healing assay in D. melanogaster embryos. As observed in epithelial monolayers, lysosomes accrued peripherally in cells exhibiting lamellipodia at the migrating front, suggesting that the dynamic reorganization of lysosomes in emerging leaders is evolutionarily conserved.

Figure 1. Immunostaining of lysosomal marker LAMP1 reveals accumulation at the periphery of marginal cells in collectively migrating epithelial cells.

Peripheral lysosome accumulation is required for leader cell identity

Next, they investigated whether lysosomal accumulation is necessary for leader cell emergence. To explore this, they used the Reversible Association of Motor Protein (RAMP) system¹⁰. In this system, the authors preferentially drove fluorescently tagged lysosomes toward the cell periphery or sequestered them near the nucleus. After being grown in a migration chamber, cells at the migration front were subjected to fluorescent time-lapse imaging. Strikingly, cells with peripheral lysosomes had a significantly greater proportion of leader cells compared to cells with perinuclear lysosomes. In fact, the proportion of leaders in cells with perinuclear lysosomes was even smaller than the baseline occurrence of leaders, and these cells exhibited peripheral actin cables and smaller focal adhesions, which are characteristic of follower cells.

Lysosomal accumulation is mechanosensitive and depends on actomyosin contractility

To determine how lysosomal reorganization occurs, the authors treated epithelial monolayers with blebbistatin or Y27632 to disrupt actomyosin contractility. After being allowed to migrate as sheets, the authors found that lysosomal relocalization was reduced and there was a lack of leader cells at the migrating front, suggesting that lysosome accumulation depends on force transmitted by the actin cytoskeleton.

To test the mechanosensitivity of lysosomal accumulation further, the authors adopted an optogenetic strategy to increase actomyosin contractility in specific cells within a monolayer¹¹. Blue light stimulation resulted in either mitochondrial or plasma membrane localization of the RhoA activator ARHGEF11. When contractility was enhanced by localizing ARGHEF11 at the plasma membrane, they observed that lysosomes in adjacent cells gathered at the cell periphery away from the light-stimulated cell. Importantly, this finding suggests that physical forces transmitted via cell-cell interactions are key relocators of lysosomes. Furthermore, the authors cultured cells in micropatterned chambers with narrow beaks, which impart spatial cues to one or two cells trapped in the beak to become leaders. They observed lysosomal reorganization in cells trapped within beaks, indicating that concentrated mechanical force triggers peripheral lysosome accumulation.

Lastly, the authors demonstrated that peripheral lysosomes promote lamellipodium formation by sequestering inactive Rho GTPase Rac1 from the plasma membrane, enhancing actin remodeling.

The figure above summarizes the proposed role of lysosomes in leader cell emergence during collective cell migration.

Why I chose this study

I was intrigued by this study because the idea that lysosomes are integrators of mechanical cues differs greatly from the canonical role of lysosomes as sites of catabolism. This study clearly demonstrates how much there is still to learn about organelles with ‘well-established’ functions.  I was also interested in this study due to my research background in brain tumour mechanobiology and cell migration. It would be fascinating to see if lysosomal reorganization also underlies tumour cell invasion in different models of cancer, and whether metastatic potential is affected by the mechanical properties of different tissues. I also appreciated the multiple experimental paradigms the authors used to address their research questions.

Questions for the authors

1. The models of collective cell migration used in this study mimic wound closure. Do you anticipate that lysosomal accumulation is conserved across different examples of collective cell migration such as gastrulation and tumour cell invasion?
2. This study demonstrates that mechanical forces from cell-cell interactions promote peripheral lysosome accumulation. Is it possible for cell-substrate interactions to influence lysosome accumulation as well? Are lysosomal accumulation and leader cell emergence sensitive to substrate stiffness?

References

1. Mayor R & Etienne-Manneville S (2016) The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 17(2):97-109.
2. Brugués A, et al. (2014) Forces driving epithelial wound healing. Nature Physics 10(9):683-690.
3. Reffay M, et al. (2014) Interplay of RhoA and mechanical forces in collective cell migration driven by leader cells. Nature Cell Biology 16(3):217-223.
4. Peglion F, Llense F, & Etienne-Manneville S (2014) Adherens junction treadmilling during collective migration. Nature Cell Biology 16(7):639-651.
5. Schiefermeier N, et al. (2014) The late endosomal p14-MP1 (LAMTOR2/3) complex regulates focal adhesion dynamics during cell migration. The Journal of Cell Biology 205(4):525-540.
6. Kozyrska K, et al. (2022) p53 directs leader cell behavior, migration, and clearance during epithelial repair. Science 375(6581):eabl8876.
7. Das T, et al. (2015) A molecular mechanotransduction pathway regulates collective migration of epithelial cells. Nature Cell Biology 17(3):276
8. Vishwakarma M, et al. (2018) Mechanical interactions among followers determine the emergence of leaders in migrating epithelial cell collectives. Nature Communications 9.
9. Bretou M, et al. (2017) Lysosome signaling controls the migration of dendritic cells. Science Immunology 2(16).
10. Guardia CM, et al. (2019) Reversible association with motor proteins (RAMP): A streptavidin-based method to manipulate organelle positioning. PLoS Biology 17(5):e3000279
11. Valon L, Marín-Llauradó A, Wyatt T, Charras G, & Trepat X (2017) Optogenetic control of cellular forces and mechanotransduction. Nature Communications 8:14396.

 

 

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.32741

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)