Menu

Close

SWI/SNF remains localized to chromatin in the presence of SCHLAP1

Jesse R Raab, Keriayn N Smith, Camarie C Spear, Carl J Manner, J. Mauro Calabrese, Terry Magnuson

Preprint posted on May 14, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1101/322065

A powerful call for reproduction studies: overexpression of a prostate cancer specific non-coding RNA does not function by depletion of SWI/SNF from chromatin to increase invasiveness.

Selected by Carmen Adriaens

The preprint and its context

In recent years, the scientific community together with funding agencies and publishing companies more strongly recognizes the necessity for reproduction studies. Fortunately, the perceived value of these studies lies not only in calling out irreproducible work or revealing scientific misconduct, but also in strengthening observations from colleagues in the field and in helping to put forward different interpretations for existing work when more information is obtained and new ways of proving a hypothesis are developed.

In 2013, the group of Prof. Chinnaiyan at the Michigan Center for Translational Pathology published a study showing that high expression of a novel long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), SChLAP1, can be used as a prognostic factor for poor outcomes in prostate cancer patients (Presner et al., Nat. Gen., 2013). Using knockdown and overexpression assays, the authors elegantly demonstrated that SChLAP1 increased the invasiveness of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, they proposed that this lncRNA is bound by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex known to both positively and negatively influence gene expression. Through SChLAP1 binding, the complex would be depleted from the chromatin to increase the expression of pro-invasion and pro-metastasis genes, hence causing the phenotype. SChLAP1 functioning was interpreted based on two observations: (1) the lncRNA binds directly to the SNF5 (SMARCB1) subunit of the SWI/SNF complex; (2) SChLAP1 overexpression causes genome-wide loss of SNF5 binding to chromatin as assessed by ChIP-sequencing.

In a recent preprint, the group of Prof. Magnuson at the University of North Carolina partially challenged and partially corrobated the above findings. On the one hand, they provided additional evidence that SChLAP1 has an important role in the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of prostate cancer cells and they validated that the SWI/SNF subunit SNF5 physically interacts with this lncRNA. On the other hand, the authors performed a series of experiments to determine whether SWI/SNF is globally depleted from the chromatin. They found that SChLAP1 overexpression did not affect broad SWI/SNF chromatin localization and binding both with the same experimental approach in the same conditions and with the same and additional reagents as in the original study. Probing changes in chromatin accessibility by ATAC-sequencing, the authors then found that the chromatin state of a set of pro-invasive genes (GO terms NFKB signaling, epithelial to mesenchymal transitions, and nucleotide metabolism) is more open, although they could not pinpoint a direct role for the SWI/SNF complex at these loci nor find evidence in the microarray data from Presner et al. for changes in their expression. Finally, the authors demonstrated that the observed binding of SChLAP1 to SWI/SNF is due to a rather promiscuous binding ability of SWI/SNF to RNA rather than to a specific effect between this lncRNA and the complex.

My opinion

Why this preprint caught my attention is because it is different from most scientific literature: it is a reproduction study. Although the scientific community agrees that these kinds of studies are necessary, still very few are conducted, and even less are published in high-visibility journals. The reasons for this are manifold. For instance, it may often make the challenger unpopular with the author(s) of the initial work, or, there is no money available to conduct a study much less flashy and novel than when original research is performed. However, the current preprint proves they are a must.

Indeed, this preprint is an excellent example of a rigorous reproduction study: although not all the results were reproduced, part of them are, and the validity of specifically these findings are strengthened independently. In the case of consistent SChLAP1 upregulation in aggressive prostate cancer, and its role in the metastatic propensity of the tumor, this could for instance prompt a company to confidently develop SChLAP1 detection as a biomarker to determine prostate cancer malignancy. Conversely, the authors took several diverse experimental approaches to show that the initially proposed mechanism of action was probably not real. Therefore, as the authors stated in the beginning of the work, an alternative hypothesis needs to be explored and I look forward to discovering what the actual mechanism of action of SChLAP1 is.

Finally, I really like the way the authors approached their biological question. I like to imagine that the concept under study is a physical object (e.g. a cube), and each face provides a different angle to look at it. Here, SChLAP1 tethering away the SWI/SNF complex from the DNA was the cube. Maybe the authors of the original article only looked at one or two faces of it, and through looking at it from multiple angles in this preprint, a different, more accurate and more complete view was obtained, and the cube was not at all what it originally seemed to be. (Figure 1)

Figure 1: Two (left) vs the many (right) faces of a “conceptual cube” in science give a very different view on what the object looks like.

Questions and concluding remarks

What prompted the authors to conduct this study? Which event or observation or results made them doubt the proposed mechanism of action?

On a more philosophical note, would access to the peer review file have helped to understand the publishing of the results? Would the absolute requirement for mechanism in high-impact factor journals lead to the risk of either overinterpretation of the work, or a potentially less careful evaluation of a striking result? (Admittedly, this is a different debate.)

From a more experimental point of view, to assess whether the dynamic chromatin sites also change in expression, the authors used the microarray data from Presner et al. I wonder if it would not be necessary to simultaneously probe gene expression changes and chromatin dynamics to be able to reach the conclusion that the one doesn’t influence the other, especially because the GO terms in the ATAC experiment point to the “opening” of genes that could explain the phenotype.

Finally, the biology of SChLAP1 seems to be different in immortalized and transformed cells. Maybe both papers use the wrong cell type to assess the mechanism, and a system that also displays the invasion phenotype would be more appropriate to find out how this lncRNA works?

 

Posted on: 15th June 2018

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Author's response

    Dr. Jesse Raab shared

    Response to questions
    – What prompted the authors to conduct this study? Which event or observation or results made them doubt the proposed mechanism of action?
    SWI/SNF composition can vary based on inclusion of some mutually exclusive subunits (BRG1 and BRM for example). I was very interested in the hypothesis that not all forms of SWI/SNF were disrupted. In prostate cancer, it seems SWI/SNF Is surprisingly rarely mutated, so I though this might suggest a mechanism aside from the whole complex being disrupted. I thought loss of SNF5 ( one SWI/SNF subunit ), might allow a change in the composition or function of SWI/SNF. I was thinking along the lines of a nice paper a few years ago, and some continuation of that work from Cigall Kadoch and Jerry Crabtree’s labs where they showed a fusion protein found in synovial sarcoma (SS18-SSX) displaced SNF5 and affected targeting of the complex. So I really wasn’t trying to replicate the Prensner paper, we were trying to take some further steps to understand some other roles SWI/SNF complexes might play. ChIP-seq of SWI/SNF can be a little tricky, so it wasn’t really until we did the biochemical experiments that I was convinced the reported mechanism wasn’t quite right.
    – On a more philosophical note, would access to the peer review file have helped to understand the publishing of the results? Would the absolute requirement for mechanism in high-impact factor journals lead to the risk of either overinterpretation of the work, or a potentially less careful evaluation of a striking result? (Admittedly, this is a different debate.)
    It might have helped, my personal preference is journals publish those files because it would help to know if anyone had thought about the sorts of issues we were thinking about.
    – From a more experimental point of view, to assess whether the dynamic chromatin sites also change in expression, the authors used the microarray data from Presner et al. I wonder if it would not be necessary to simultaneously probe gene expression changes and chromatin dynamics to be able to reach the conclusion that the one doesn’t influence the other, especially because the GO terms in the ATAC experiment point to the “opening” of genes that could explain the phenotype.
    We interpreted the array data to at least partially support the ATAC data, and we wouldn’t really expect all ATAC and microarray expression changes to align perfectly. So I wasn’t real convinced doing more expression analysis would change our conclusion, but I agree with the suggestion and doing this might strengthen our results. To further strengthen our main result, it might make sense to knockout SNF5 from RWPE1 and see if that differs from the SCHLAP1 overexpression. If it differs, it would support our conclusions, if they look the same it would support the previous paper.
    -Finally, the biology of SChLAP1 seems to be different in immortalized and transformed cells. Maybe both papers use the wrong cell type to assess the mechanism, and a system that also displays the invasion phenotype would be more appropriate to find out how this lncRNA works?
    I think both cell types have the invasive phenotype, and it correlates with the expression of SCHLAP1. I am curious whether the benign epithelial cells (RWPE1) have the correct signaling pathways and things that might be present in tumors to really see a strong phenotype. We purposely chose to work mostly in that cell type so that we would have a relatively normal cell, but if the lncRNA needs co-factors not present in that cell type we would miss them.

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the biochemistry category:

    The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes

    Shintaro Maeda, Chinatsu Otomo, Takanori Otomo



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    LTK is an ER-resident receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates secretion

    Federica G. Centonze, Veronika Reiterer, Karsten Nalbach, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    1

    Plant photoreceptors and their signaling components compete for binding to the ubiquitin ligase COP1 using their VP-peptide motifs

    Kelvin Lau, Roman Podolec, Richard Chappuis, et al.



    Selected by Martin Balcerowicz

    HIV-1 Gag specifically restricts PI(4,5)P2 and cholesterol mobility in living cells creating a nanodomain platform for virus assembly

    C. Favard, J. Chojnacki, P. Merida, et al.



    Selected by Amberley Stephens

    Aqueous synthesis of a small-molecule lanthanide chelator amenable to copper-free click chemistry

    Stephanie Cara Bishop, Robert Winefield, Asokan Anbanandam, et al.



    Selected by Zhang-He Goh

    Hepatocyte-specific deletion of Pparα promotes NASH in the context of obesity

    Marion Regnier, Arnaud Polizzi, Sarra Smati, et al.



    Selected by Pablo Ranea Robles

    Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high resolution cryo-EM

    Claudio Schmidli, Stefan Albiez, Luca Rima, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    ENDOSOMAL MEMBRANE TENSION CONTROLS ESCRT-III-DEPENDENT INTRA-LUMENAL VESICLE FORMATION

    Vincent Mercier, Jorge Larios, Guillaume Molinard, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    1

    Dynamic Aha1 Co-Chaperone Binding to Human Hsp90

    Javier Oroz, Laura J Blair, Markus Zweckstetter



    Selected by Reid Alderson

    1

    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    1

    Structures of the Otopetrin Proton Channels Otop1 and Otop3

    Kei Saotome, Bochuan Teng, Che Chun (Alex) Tsui, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.



    Selected by Mila Basic

    S-acylated Golga7b stabilises DHHC5 at the plasma membrane to regulate desmosome assembly and cell adhesion.

    Keith T Woodley, Mark O Collins



    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne

    3

    A complex containing lysine-acetylated actin inhibits the formin INF2

    Mu A, Tak Shun Fung, Arminja N. Kettenbach, et al.



    Selected by Laura McCormick

    1

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Atlas of Subcellular RNA Localization Revealed by APEX-seq

    Furqan M Fazal, Shuo Han, Pornchai Kaewsapsak, et al.

    AND

    Proximity RNA labeling by APEX-Seq Reveals the Organization of Translation Initiation Complexes and Repressive RNA Granules

    Alejandro Padron, Shintaro Iwasaki, Nicholas Ingolia



    Selected by Christian Bates

    Also in the bioinformatics category:

    Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences

    Huanle Liu, Oguzhan Begik, Morghan C Lucas, et al.



    Selected by Christian Bates

    1

    Slide-seq: A Scalable Technology for Measuring Genome-Wide Expression at High Spatial Resolution

    Samuel G Rodriques, Robert R Stickels, Aleksandrina Goeva, et al.

    AND

    High-density spatial transcriptomics arrays for in situ tissue profiling

    Sanja Vickovic, Goekcen Eraslan, Johanna Klughammer, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Endogenous CRISPR arrays for scalable whole organism lineage tracing

    James Cotterell, James Sharpe



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation

    Caleb Weinreb, Alejo E Rodriguez-Fraticelli, Fernando D Camargo, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    1

    Charting a tissue from single-cell transcriptomes

    Mor Nitzan, Nikos Karaiskos, Nir Friedman, et al.



    Selected by Irepan Salvador-Martinez

    Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes and their predicted functions

    Hila Sberro, Nicholas Greenfield, Georgios Pavlopoulos, et al.



    Selected by Ganesh Kadamur

    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer



    Selected by Romain F. Laine

    The embryonic transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana

    Falko Hofmann, Michael A Schon, Michael D Nodine



    Selected by Chandra Shekhar Misra

    1

    The landscape of antigen-specific T cells in human cancers

    Bo Li, Longchao Liu, Jian Zhang, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals novel cell differentiation dynamics during human airway epithelium regeneration

    Sandra Ruiz Garcia, Marie Deprez, Kevin Lebrigand, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    PUMILIO hyperactivity drives premature aging of Norad-deficient mice

    Florian Kopp, Mehmet Yalvac, Beibei Chen, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Target-specific precision of CRISPR-mediated genome editing

    Anob M Chakrabarti, Tristan Henser-Brownhill, Josep Monserrat, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Precise tuning of gene expression output levels in mammalian cells

    Yale S. Michaels, Mike B Barnkob, Hector Barbosa, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs

    Chong Tang, Tian Yu, Yeming Xie, et al.



    Selected by Fabio Liberante

    An atlas of the aging lung mapped by single cell transcriptomics and deep tissue proteomics

    Ilias Angelidis, Lukas M Simon, Isis E Fernandez, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    SWI/SNF remains localized to chromatin in the presence of SCHLAP1

    Jesse R Raab, Keriayn N Smith, Camarie C Spear, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    1

    Also in the cancer biology category:

    Oncogenic hijacking of a developmental transcription factor evokes therapeutic vulnerability for ROS-induction in Ewing sarcoma

    Aruna Marchetto, Shunya Ohmura, Martin F. Orth, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    Myc instructs and maintains pancreatic adenocarcinoma phenotype

    Nicole M Sodir, Roderik M Kortlever, Valentin JA Barthet, et al.



    Selected by William Hill

    Quantification of microenvironmental metabolites in murine cancer models reveals determinants of tumor nutrient availability

    Mark R Sullivan, Laura V Danai, Caroline A Lewis, et al.



    Selected by Maria Rafaeva

    1

    Mechanical Stretch Kills Transformed Cancer Cells

    Ajay Tijore, Mingxi Yao, Yu-Hsiu Wang, et al.



    Selected by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.



    Selected by Mila Basic

    A conserved MFS orchestrates a subset of O-glycosylation to facilitate macrophage dissemination and tissue invasion

    Katarina Valoskova, Julia Biebl, Marko Roblek, et al.



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    1

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

    Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, et al.



    Selected by Katie Weiner

    1

    Applications, Promises, and Pitfalls of Deep Learning for Fluorescence Image Reconstruction

    Chinmay Belthangady , Loic A. Royer



    Selected by Romain F. Laine

    Basal extrusion drives cell invasion and mechanical stripping of E-cadherin

    John Fadul, Gloria M Slattum, Nadja M Redd, et al.



    Selected by William Hill

    Molecularly distinct models of zebrafish Myc-induced B cell leukemia

    Chiara Borga, Clay Foster, Sowmya Iyer, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    1

    The landscape of antigen-specific T cells in human cancers

    Bo Li, Longchao Liu, Jian Zhang, et al.



    Selected by Rob Hynds

    1

    Unjamming overcomes kinetic and proliferation arrest in terminally differentiated cells and promotes collective motility of carcinoma.

    Andrea Palamidessi, Chiara Malinverno, Emanuela FRITTOLI, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    STAT3 promotes melanoma metastasis by CEBP-induced repression of the MITF pigmentation pathway

    Alexander Swoboda, Robert Soukup, Katharina Kinslechner, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    Memory sequencing reveals heritable single cell gene expression programs associated with distinct cellular behaviors

    Sydney M Shaffer, Benjamin L Emert, Ann E. Sizemore, et al.



    Selected by Leighton Daigh

    2

    Anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF stimulation on endothelium deficient in phosphoinositide recycling

    Amber N Stratman, Olivia M Farrelly, Constantinos M Mikelis, et al.



    Selected by Coert Margadant

    Also in the cell biology category:

    The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes

    Shintaro Maeda, Chinatsu Otomo, Takanori Otomo



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    LTK is an ER-resident receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates secretion

    Federica G. Centonze, Veronika Reiterer, Karsten Nalbach, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    1

    Distinct RhoGEFs activate apical and junctional actomyosin contractility under control of G proteins during epithelial morphogenesis

    Alain Garcia De Las Bayonas, Jean-Marc Philippe, Annemarie C. Lellouch, et al.



    Selected by Ivana Viktorinová

    1

    In vivo glucose imaging in multiple model organisms with an engineered single-wavelength sensor

    Jacob P. Keller, Jonathan S. Marvin, Haluk Lacin, et al.



    Selected by Stephan Daetwyler

    1

    The spindle assembly checkpoint functions during early development in non-chordate embryos

    Janet Chenevert, Marianne Roca, Lydia Besnardeau, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    Blue light induces neuronal-activity-regulated gene expression in the absence of optogenetic proteins

    Kelsey M. Tyssowski, Jesse M. Gray



    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    Mutations in the Insulator Protein Suppressor of Hairy Wing Induce Genome Instability

    Shih-Jui Hsu, Emily C. Stow, James R. Simmons, et al.



    Selected by Maiko Kitaoka

    1

    Multi-immersion open-top light-sheet microscope for high-throughput imaging of cleared tissues

    Adam K. Glaser, Nicholas P. Reder, Ye Chen, et al.



    Selected by Tim Fessenden

    1

    ATAT1-enriched vesicles promote microtubule acetylation via axonal transport

    Aviel Even, Giovanni Morelli, Chiara Scaramuzzino, et al.



    Selected by Stephen Royle

    1

    HIV-1 Gag specifically restricts PI(4,5)P2 and cholesterol mobility in living cells creating a nanodomain platform for virus assembly

    C. Favard, J. Chojnacki, P. Merida, et al.



    Selected by Amberley Stephens

    Hepatocyte-specific deletion of Pparα promotes NASH in the context of obesity

    Marion Regnier, Arnaud Polizzi, Sarra Smati, et al.



    Selected by Pablo Ranea Robles

    Mitochondrial biogenesis is transcriptionally repressed in lysosomal lipid storage diseases

    King Faisal Yambire, Lorena Fernandez-Mosquera, Robert Steinfeld, et al.



    Selected by Sandra Franco Iborra

    1

    Thyroid hormone regulates distinct paths to maturation in pigment cell lineages

    Lauren Saunders, Abhishek Mishra, Andrew J Aman, et al.



    Selected by Hannah Brunsdon

    1

    Kinesin-6 Klp9 plays motor-dependent and -independent roles in collaboration with Kinesin-5 Cut7 and the microtubule crosslinker Ase1 in fission yeast

    Masashi Yukawa, Masaki Okazaki, Yasuhiro Teratani, et al.



    Selected by I. Bouhlel

    A pair of E3 ubiquitin ligases compete to regulate filopodial dynamics and axon guidance

    Nicholas P Boyer, Laura E McCormick, Fabio L Urbina, et al.



    Selected by Angika Basant

    1

    SorCS1-mediated Sorting of Neurexin in Dendrites Maintains Presynaptic Function

    Luis Filipe Ribeiro, Ben Verpoort, Julie Nys, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    1

    Also in the genetics category:

    The Hunchback temporal transcription factor determines motor neuron axon and dendrite targeting in Drosophila

    Austin Q Seroka, Chris Q Doe



    Selected by Abagael Lasseigne

    1

    Preformed Chromatin Topology Assists Transcriptional Robustness of Shh during Limb Development

    Christina Paliou, Philine Guckelberger, Robert Schöpflin, et al.



    Selected by Rafael Galupa

    1

    Molecular Logic of Spinocerebellar Tract Neuron Diversity and Connectivity

    Myungin Baek, Vilas Menon, Thomas Jessell, et al.



    Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

    Over-activation of BMP signaling in neural crest cells precipitates heart outflow tract septation

    Jean Francois Darrigrand, Mariana Valente, Pauline Martinez, et al.



    Selected by Giulia Boezio

    Functional dissection of TADs reveals non-essential and instructive roles in regulating gene expression

    Alexandra Despang, Robert Schöpflin, Martin Franke, et al.



    Selected by Clarice Hong

    Crowdfunded whole-genome sequencing of the celebrity cat Lil BUB identifies causal mutations for her osteopetrosis and polydactyly

    Mike Bridavsky, Heiner Kuhl, Arthur Woodruf, et al.



    Selected by Jesus Victorino, Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming

    Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Juan Song, et al.



    Selected by Sergio Menchero

    Kinesin-6 Klp9 plays motor-dependent and -independent roles in collaboration with Kinesin-5 Cut7 and the microtubule crosslinker Ase1 in fission yeast

    Masashi Yukawa, Masaki Okazaki, Yasuhiro Teratani, et al.



    Selected by I. Bouhlel

    Human Handedness: Genetics, Microtubules, Neuropsychiatric Diseases and Brain Language Areas

    Akira Wiberg, Gwenaelle Douaud, Michael Ng, et al.



    Selected by Jose Guerrero

    The Spatio-Temporal Control of Zygotic Genome Activation

    George Gentsch, Nick D. L. Owens, James C. Smith



    Selected by Meng Zhu

    Multilevel regulation of the glass locus during Drosophila eye development

    Cornelia Fritsch, F. Javier Bernardo-Garcia, Tim Humberg, et al.



    Selected by Gabriel Aughey

    1

    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    A direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila

    Christopher M Uyehara, Daniel J McKay



    Selected by Natalie Dye

    MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

    Emily Yun-Chia Chang, James P Wells, Shu-Huei Tsai, et al.



    Selected by Katie Weiner

    1

    Super-resolution Molecular Map of Basal Foot Reveals Novel Cilium in Airway Multiciliated Cells

    Quynh Nguyen, Zhen Liu, Rashmi Nanjundappa, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    Single cell RNA-Seq reveals distinct stem cell populations that drive sensory hair cell regeneration in response to loss of Fgf and Notch signaling

    Mark E. Lush, Daniel C. Diaz, Nina Koenecke, et al.

    AND

    Distinct progenitor populations mediate regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eric D Thomas, David Raible



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    2

    Also in the molecular biology category:

    The autophagic membrane tether ATG2A transfers lipids between membranes

    Shintaro Maeda, Chinatsu Otomo, Takanori Otomo



    Selected by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    LTK is an ER-resident receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates secretion

    Federica G. Centonze, Veronika Reiterer, Karsten Nalbach, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    1

    Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences

    Huanle Liu, Oguzhan Begik, Morghan C Lucas, et al.



    Selected by Christian Bates

    1

    Blue light induces neuronal-activity-regulated gene expression in the absence of optogenetic proteins

    Kelsey M. Tyssowski, Jesse M. Gray



    Selected by Zheng-Shan Chong

    Slide-seq: A Scalable Technology for Measuring Genome-Wide Expression at High Spatial Resolution

    Samuel G Rodriques, Robert R Stickels, Aleksandrina Goeva, et al.

    AND

    High-density spatial transcriptomics arrays for in situ tissue profiling

    Sanja Vickovic, Goekcen Eraslan, Johanna Klughammer, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    Optical determination of absolute membrane potential

    Julia R. Lazzari-Dean, Anneliese M.M. Gest, Evan Miller



    Selected by James Marchant

    MicroRNA-mediated control of developmental lymphangiogenesis

    Hyun Min Jung, Ciara Hu, Alexandra M Fister, et al.



    Selected by Rudra Nayan Das

    Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high resolution cryo-EM

    Claudio Schmidli, Stefan Albiez, Luca Rima, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    A DNA-based voltmeter for organelles

    Anand Saminathan, John Devany, Kavya S Pillai, et al.



    Selected by Robert Mahen

    1

    Structures of the Otopetrin Proton Channels Otop1 and Otop3

    Kei Saotome, Bochuan Teng, Che Chun (Alex) Tsui, et al.



    Selected by David Wright

    Central spindle microtubules are strongly coupled to chromosomes during both anaphase A and anaphase B

    Che-Hang Yu, Stefanie Redemann, Hai-Yin Wu, et al.



    Selected by Federico Pelisch

    1

    Cell growth dilutes the cell cycle inhibitor Rb to trigger cell division

    Evgeny Zatulovskiy, Daniel F. Berenson, Benjamin R. Topacio, et al.



    Selected by Zaki Ahmad

    1

    Distinct ROPGEFs successively drive polarization and outgrowth of root hairs

    Philipp Denninger, Anna Reichelt, Vanessa Aphaia Fiona Schmidt, et al.



    Selected by Marc Somssich

    Inactive USP14 and inactive UCHL5 cause accumulation of distinct ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells

    Jayashree Chadchankar, Victoria Korboukh, Peter Doig, et al.



    Selected by Mila Basic

    Bacteriophage resistance alters antibiotic mediated intestinal expansion of enterococci

    Anushila Chatterjee, Cydney N Johnson, Phat Luong, et al.



    Selected by Yasmin Lau

    On-site ribosome remodeling by locally synthesized ribosomal proteins in axons

    Toshiaki Shigeoka, Max Koppers, Hovy Ho-Wai Wong, et al.



    Selected by Srivats Venkataramanan
    Close