Menu

Close

Tunable molecular tension sensors reveal extension-based control of vinculin loading

Andrew S LaCroix, Andrew D Lynch, Matthew E Berginski, Brenton D Hoffman

Preprint posted on February 12, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/02/12/264549

The tension sensors of the future - better optimized genetically encoded probes reveal novel mechanistic detail in how mechanotransduction works

Selected by Amanda Haage

Categories: biophysics, cell biology

Why This Is CoolIt is now widely accepted that besides responding to chemical cues in their environment, cells also participate in mechanotransduction, a process by which they sense and respond to physical aspects of the environment (i.e. matrix stiffness or shear stress, etc.). The main way cells do this is through mechanosensitive signaling or the conformational change of load-bearing proteins in response to force. The main way this has been studied is through FRET-based tension sensors that are genetically encoded into those load-bearing proteins. The problem addressed by this work is that to date, the design of these tension sensors has been based on models created in cell-free systems, but they are then exclusively used in cells. Here they provide a novel and validated method for predicting tension sensor sensitivity in cells. This allows them to create an optimized tension sensor for the load-bearing protein vinculin that is determined to be 300% better by their calculations. They use this optimized sensor to demonstrate a gradient of forces across focal adhesions at the cell periphery. They are also able to use sensors of varying length to determine that protein extension, rather than the force experienced by the protein, may be the major mechanism of mechanical signaling in cells. This work provides an incredibly useful tool in mapping out the future of precise new sensor design. It demonstrates the usefulness of optimized sensors to uncover new mechanisms of mechanical signaling.

 

Fig. 1 – (A) Design and characterization of tunable FRET-based molecular tension sensors. Sensor function depends on the Förster radius of the chosen FRET pair (B) as well as the length (C) and stiffness (D) of the extensible polypeptide domain.

 

Why I Selected ItI think the model presented here will quickly be adopted as the new standard in molecular tension sensor design. They have essentially eliminated the previous system of designing that was based on literature guesswork and then checking if sensors work through extensive cellular characterization. As someone interested in mechanobiology, I look forward to seeing a new crop of tension sensors that are designed based on this model and expanded to other load-bearing proteins.

 Open Questions

  • Are there any reasons the principles of tension sensor design discussed here could not be expanded to proteins other than vinculin?
  • In which cellular contexts would either an extension- or force-based control mechanism be more advantageous? Why would this be a context-specific way to modulate mechanical signaling?
  • Will tension sensors ever be useful in vivo?

Related Research

  • The first calibrated genetically-encoded molecular tension sensor module & the original vinculin tension sensor
    • Grashoff, C., Hoffman, B. D., Brenner, M. D., Zhou, R., Parsons, M., Yang, M. T., McLean, M. A., Sligar, S. G., Chen, C. S., Ha, T., Schwartz, M. A. (2010). Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature, 466: 263-266. doi:10.1038/nature09198
  • Review of the field and current limitations
    • Freikamp, A., Mehlich, A., Klingner, C., Grashoff, C. (2016b). Investigating piconewton forces in cells by FRET-based molecular force microscopy. J Struct Biol. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2016.03.011

 

Tags: cell-ecm adhesion, mechanotransduction, protein biology

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Author's response

    Brent Hoffman shared

    1. The new modules can be applied to any existing tension sensor. There are always challenges associated with making a tension sensor for a new protein, as a significant number of controls have to be done to ensure that the insertion of the tension sensing module does not affect the function of the protein to be studied. In this regard, the modules developed in this work have all the same issues as the other published modules.
    2. Great question. We are working on it now
    3. While not our work, there are several examples of the tension sensor being useful in vivo. Here are two examples. Some of the papers are quite recent.
      1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118667/. Although this study has recently been challenged: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14136-y
      2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680264/

    Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    Spatiotemporally controlled Myosin relocalization and internal pressure cause biased cortical extension to generate sibling cell size asymmetry

    Tri Thanh Pham, Arnaud Monnard, Jonne Helenius, et al.



    Selected by Giuliana Clemente

    Nuclear decoupling is part of a rapid protein-level cellular response to high-intensity mechanical loading

    Hamish T J Gilbert, Venkatesh Mallikarjun, Oana Dobre, et al.



    Selected by Rebecca Quelch

    1

    A robust method for transfection in choanoflagellates illuminates their cell biology and the ancestry of animal septins

    David Booth, Heather Middleton, Nicole King



    Selected by Maya Emmons-Bell

    SWI/SNF remains localized to chromatin in the presence of SCHLAP1

    Jesse R Raab, Keriayn N Smith, Camarie C Spear, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens

    1

    Clathrin plaques form mechanotransducing platforms

    Agathe Franck, Jeanne Laine, Gilles Moulay, et al.



    Selected by Amanda Haage

    Cellular Crowding Influences Extrusion and Proliferation to Facilitate Epithelial Tissue Repair

    Jovany Jeomar Franco, Youmna Maryline Atieh, Chase Dallas Bryan, et al.



    Selected by Helen Weavers

    A non-cell autonomous actin redistribution enables isotropic retinal growth

    Marija Matejcic, Guillaume Salbreux, Caren Norden



    Selected by Yara E. Sánchez Corrales

    1

    Rearing temperature and fatty acid supplementation jointly affect membrane fluidity and heat tolerance in Daphnia

    Dominik Martin-Creuzburg, Bret L. Coggins, Dieter Ebert, et al.



    Selected by Alexander Little

    Live-cell imaging of marked chromosome regions reveals dynamics of mitotic chromosome resolution and compaction

    John K Eykelenboom, Marek Gierlinski, Zuojun Yue, et al.

    AND

    Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells

    Elisa Dultz, Roberta Mancini, Guido Polles, et al.



    Selected by Carmen Adriaens, Gautam Dey

    Optogenetic reconstitution reveals that Dynein-Dynactin-NuMA clusters generate cortical spindle-pulling forces as a multi-arm ensemble

    Masako Okumura, Toyoaki Natsume, Masato T Kanemaki, et al.



    Selected by Arnaud Monnard

    1

    Optogenetic reconstitution reveals that Dynein-Dynactin-NuMA clusters generate cortical spindle-pulling forces as a multi-arm ensemble

    Masako Okumura, Toyoaki Natsume, Masato T Kanemaki, et al.



    Selected by Ben Craske, Thibault Legal and Toni McHugh

    A novel microtubule nucleation pathway for meiotic spindle assembly in oocytes

    Pierre ROME, Hiroyuki OHKURA



    Selected by Binyam Mogessie

    ERM proteins: The missing actin linkers in clathrin-mediated endocytosis

    Audun Sverre Kvalvaag, Kay Oliver Schink, Andreas Brech, et al.



    Selected by Nicola Stevenson

    Cell type-specific interchromosomal interactions as a mechanism for transcriptional diversity

    Adan Horta, Kevin Monahan, Lisa Bashkirova, et al.



    Selected by Boyan Bonev

    A non-canonical role for dynamin-1 in regulating early stages of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in non-neuronal cells

    Saipraveen Srinivasan, Christoph J. Burckhardt, Madhura Bhave, et al.



    Selected by Penelope La-Borde

    Atomic model of microtubule-bound tau

    Elizabeth H Kellogg, Nisreen M.A. Hejab, Simon Poepsel, et al.



    Selected by Satish Bodakuntla

    1

    Close

    We want to make our website, and the services we provide, useful and reliable. This sometimes involves placing small amounts of information called cookies on the device you used to access the internet. If you continue to use this website we will assume you are happy to accept our cookies.

    Accept