Identification of neural oscillations and epileptiform changes in human brain organoids

Ranmal A. Samarasinghe, Osvaldo A. Miranda, Simon Mitchell, Isabella Ferando, Momoko Watanabe, Jessie E. Buth, Arinnae Kurdian, Peyman Golshani, Kathrin Plath, William E. Lowry, Jack M. Parent, Istvan Mody, Bennett G. Novitch

Preprint posted on 28 October 2019 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/820183v1

Article now published in Nature Neuroscience at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00906-5

Excitatory/inhibitory fusion organoids OSCILLATE! In combination with iPSC technology this allows patient specific drug tailoring, as exemplified by Rett Syndrome in this preprint.

Selected by Theresa Pohlkamp

Categories: cell biology, developmental biology, neuroscience, physiology

Background

In the past decade, human fibroblast-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) changed the landscape of preclinical research. Patient derived iPSCs are now utilized by researchers to grow organoids of different kind to study disease mechanisms and for personalized drug tailoring. Modeling the brain in form of an organoid is a particular challenge due to the diversity of neurons and other brain cell types that inhabit the most complex human organ. Networks of inhibitory and excitatory neurons are required to generate rhythmic brain activity in the range of gamma-oscillations (30-100 Hz), a modality of cognitive operations. Until very recently, brain organoids did not develop these rhythmic patterns, mostly due to an underrepresentation of GABAergic interneurons. However, in August a first study reported gamma oscillations in 6-10 months aged organoids (Trujillo et al., 2019).

During brain development GABAergic interneuron precursors migrate from a transitory structure, the ganglionic eminence (GE), to populate the maturing cortex and intermingle with excitatory neurons. Once neurons are positioned they establish a complex network across different brain structures to allow high cognitive function. Network malfunctioning can cause a variety of different neurological disorders, including schizophrenia, autism, and epilepsy. Rett syndrome is a rare neurological disorder in women, in which heterozygous disruption of the X-chromosomal gene MECP2 leads to coordination problems, repetitive movements, language deficits, and commonly epileptic seizures, which are caused by excessive and hypersynchronous activity of neural networks. In this study, the authors explore whether network-level functions of the brain, and their disruption in disease, can be studied using organoid models.

Findings

To generate brain organoids that are assembled as a network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons the authors fused human stem cell derived cortical (Cx) and GE organoids, similar as described before (Xiang et al., 2017). Organoids were treated with or without Sonic hedgehog pathway agonists to induce the growth of GE or Cx organoids, respectively. Once specified, organoids were fused and their joint development resulted in the integration of GE interneurons into the cortex. With calcium imaging and local field potential recordings (LFP), the physiological activity at single cell, microcircuit, and network level was characterized. After less than a month of co-culture the administration of GABA_A receptor antagonists evoked repetitive waves of synchronized calcium transients. Moreover, during LFP recording the authors found interneuron-dependent multi-frequency oscillations (<100 Hz), comparable to what is found in mature neural networks in vivo.

Next, the authors took advantage of the human iPSC technology to grow brain organoids of fibroblasts obtained from an individual with Rett syndrome. To obtain isogenic control organoids they took advantage of random X-chromosomal inactivation that lead to a mosaic distribution of cells that express either the functional or the mutated MECP2 allele. X-chromosomal inactivation is not reversed during iPSC reprogramming or differentiation. Whereas no obvious differences in cytoarchitecture and cell composition were detected, the number of excitatory synapses was increased in the MECP2 deficient organoids. In addition, they recorded spontaneous epochs of synchronized calcium transients similar to what was observed after GABA_A receptor treatment in controls. Moreover, whereas low-frequency (<100 Hz) oscillations were not produced by MECP2-lacking organoids, they exhibited high-frequency events.

Next, the authors performed an elegant exchange experiment in which MECP2-deficient GE organoids were fused with control Cx organoids, or vice versa. By doing this, they demonstrated that the observed differences in oscillations are caused by MECP2 lacking GE interneurons, rather than Cx derived neurons. In a drug rescue approach they found that the broad-spectrum anti-seizure medication sodium valproate reduced the events of spontaneous high-frequency firing but did not restore the oscillation pattern of MECP2-deficient mixed brain organoids. In contrast, the putative TP53 inhibitor Pifithrin-α restored gamma oscillations.

Why I chose this preprint

At the Society for Neuroscience meeting in Chicago this past October I “accidentally” learned a lot about brain organoids. The presidential lecture, held by Dr. Paola Arlotta, was so inspiring that I went to the following “Brain and Retina Organoid Social” to take my chance to fire questions at some very friendly and excited specialists in this field. I realized that in biomedical research human brain organoids provide great benefits over animal models but that this new technology also faces challenges: whereas the genetics are right, the complexity is not. Animal models designed to study human brain disorders have enhanced our molecular understanding, but their translatability usually fails once it comes to clinical trials. Now brain organoids derived from iPSCs of patients with neuronal disorders are on the forefront of efforts to model preclinical studies. Due to reduced complexity organoids will not replace animal models, but are a unique opportunity to study human genetics in a brain model. They develop a comparable neurodiversity to embryonic brains (Gotz, 2018). Recent progress in brain organoid technology allows vascularization (Pham et al., 2018), ventricle formation (Lancaster et al., 2013), organization of cortical regions (Kanton et al., 2019), and the differentiation of glia into astrocytes (Dezonne et al., 2017), microglia, and myelinating oligodendrocytes (Marton et al., 2019). To me as a scientist who characterized interneurons as a graduate student, the progress of interneuronal innervation to generate oscillatory networks was one of the most exciting aspects. Vascularization supports the nutritional supply of the brain organoids and may further promote their growth and complexity. The neuron-glia interaction is of importance to study microglial inflammatory responses that contribute to neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. Overall, there is an urgent need of a human in vitro model in which neurons, glia, and vascularization develop conjointly. The preprint highlighted here provides a pioneering and very valuable example of utilizing brain organoids for patient specific drug tailoring as a translatable tool to find a cure for human diseases of the brain.

Questions for the authors

Rett syndrome is X-linked, and MECP2-loss follows a mosaic pattern. Is it possible to produce mosaic brain organoids in culture? What would you expect if the organoids would be mosaic?
How would Pifithrin-α affect the oscillation in control brain organoids?
Trujillo et al. (Trujillo et al., 2019) grew brain organoids for up to 10 months to obtain oscillations. Your method generates oscillations after less than three months of total culture time. In addition your method allows an elegant swip-swap approach. How do you think these different methods will serve different questions in the future?
How would you compare your results to the findings published by Trujillo et al. on BioRxiv last year, where they also describe oscillation deficits in MECP2 deficient brain organoids (Trujillo et al., 2018)?

References

Dezonne, R.S., Sartore, R.C., Nascimento, J.M., Saia-Cereda, V.M., Romao, L.F., Alves-Leon, S.V., de Souza, J.M., Martins-de-Souza, D., Rehen, S.K., and Gomes, F.C. (2017). Derivation of Functional Human Astrocytes from Cerebral Organoids. Scientific reports 7, 45091.

Gotz, M. (2018). Revising concepts about adult stem cells. Science 359, 639-640.

Kanton, S., Boyle, M.J., He, Z., Santel, M., Weigert, A., Sanchis-Calleja, F., Guijarro, P., Sidow, L., Fleck, J.S., Han, D., et al. (2019). Organoid single-cell genomic atlas uncovers human-specific features of brain development. Nature 574, 418-422.

Lancaster, M.A., Renner, M., Martin, C.A., Wenzel, D., Bicknell, L.S., Hurles, M.E., Homfray, T., Penninger, J.M., Jackson, A.P., and Knoblich, J.A. (2013). Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373-379.

Marton, R.M., Miura, Y., Sloan, S.A., Li, Q., Revah, O., Levy, R.J., Huguenard, J.R., and Pasca, S.P. (2019). Differentiation and maturation of oligodendrocytes in human three-dimensional neural cultures. Nature neuroscience 22, 484-491.

Pham, M.T., Pollock, K.M., Rose, M.D., Cary, W.A., Stewart, H.R., Zhou, P., Nolta, J.A., and Waldau, B. (2018). Generation of human vascularized brain organoids. Neuroreport 29, 588-593.

Trujillo, C.A., Gao, R., Negraes, P.D., Chaim, I.A., Domissy, A., Vandenberghe, M., Devor, A., Yeo, G.W., Voytek, B., and Muotri, A.R. (2018). Nested oscillatory dynamics in cortical organoids model early human brain network development. BioRxiv.

Trujillo, C.A., Gao, R., Negraes, P.D., Gu, J., Buchanan, J., Preissl, S., Wang, A., Wu, W., Haddad, G.G., Chaim, I.A., et al. (2019). Complex Oscillatory Waves Emerging from Cortical Organoids Model Early Human Brain Network Development. Cell stem cell 25, 558-569 e557.

Xiang, Y., Tanaka, Y., Patterson, B., Kang, Y.J., Govindaiah, G., Roselaar, N., Cakir, B., Kim, K.Y., Lombroso, A.P., Hwang, S.M., et al. (2017). Fusion of Regionally Specified hPSC-Derived Organoids Models Human Brain Development and Interneuron Migration. Cell stem cell 21, 383-398 e387.

Tags: brain organoids, epilepsy, gamma oscillation, ganglionic eminence, interneurons, ipscs, mecp2, oscillation, rett syndrome

Posted on: 25 November 2019

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.15281

Read preprint

(1 votes)

Author's response

Bennett Novitch and Ranmal Samarasinghe shared

Hi Theresa,

Thank you for selecting our study for discussion! Below are are our responses to your questions. Our response is in bold text.

Rett syndrome is X-linked, and MECP2-loss follows a mosaic pattern. Is it possible to produce mosaic brain organoids in culture? What would you expect if the organoids would be mosaic?

It is theoretically possible to create a mosaic organoid by combining the mutant and isogenic control stem cells in pre-defined proportions at the time of organoid generation. For example, we typically start with ~9000 stem cells at the beginning of the organoid plating process (Day 0). To create a 50/50 mosaic (50% cells have mutant MECP2 and 50% express the functional protein), we would initiate the organoid plating process with a mix of 4500 mutant and 4500 isogenic control stem cells.

It is difficult to exactly predict how this will play out once the organoid matures, but we predict that we should end up with a hybrid phenotype similar to the mixed fusion results from the paper. In other words, something less severe than the non-mosaic mutant, but exhibiting a range of network defects. Stay tuned….

How would Pifithrin-α affect the oscillation in control brain organoids?

It is unlikely that this would have much effect in controls. Prior studies from our collaborator Bill Lowry’s group (Ohashi et al. Stem Cell Reports 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.001) found that a characteristic feature of MECP2 mutant cells is activation of p53-associated cell senescence pathways. We have no evidence that control organoids exhibit this senescence response, so we have no reason to expect that Pifithrin would have any significant impact on neural activities in these samples.

Trujillo et al. grew brain organoids for up to 10 months to obtain oscillations. Your method generates oscillations after less than three months of total culture time. In addition your method allows an elegant swip-swap approach. How do you think these different methods will serve different questions in the future?

Our approaches are different in multiple ways. We likely see oscillations earlier due to a combination of factors including (1) increased sensitivity with use of traditional microelectrodes that penetrate the organoids and (2) because we intentionally generated “fusion” organoids with a mix of inhibitory and excitatory neurons from the start. We have found that interneuron-excitatory cell integration is critical for generating complex oscillatory activity. Trujillo et al report that interneurons in their organoids spontaneously arise much later in development in their protocol than our protocol where we generate cortex and ganglionic eminence structures separately. They also use multi-electrode array methods (MEA), where the organoids lay on top of surface electrodes embedded in culture plates. This approach likely picks up activity from neurons at the outer surface of the organoid that end up in contact with the electrodes. The organoids also require prolonged plating on these MEAs, which also likely impacts their 3D structure compared to our approach where we are measuring from intact 3D samples.

As a result of these differences, we think that our approach using fusion organoids may be better suited to identify oscillatory activity at earlier time points, for isolating interneuron vs excitatory neuron contributions to oscillations, and for sampling LFPs from deeper components of the organoid. The MEA approach is better suited for chronic recordings where the same organoid can be measured a number of times over an extended period of time. In addition, to the extent that the MEA picks up activity, this approach allows one to sample with more electrodes (multiple) than what we currently employ. However, the density of electrodes can be modified in our system as well.

How would you compare your results to the findings published by Trujillo et al. on BioRxiv last year, where they also describe oscillation deficits in MECP2 deficient brain organoids (Trujillo et al., 2018)?

Please note that the Trujillo et al. removed their MECP2 mutant organoid results from their published paper. With this caveat, our LFP results are generally in agreement in that we also find deficits in oscillatory activity in MECP2 mutant brain organoids, though what we see is distinct from their analysis. For example, they show a general reduction in spiking whereas we see a marked increase which is associated with epileptiform activities. Trujillo et al. also reported deficits in overall organoid size and production of upper layer neurons (CTIP2, SATB2) in MECP2 KO organoids using single cell analysis, which we did not observe in our immunohistochemical analysis. Using our mix and match fusion organoid approach, we also found the oscillatory defects that we observe appear to stem in large part from MECP2 deficiency in the ganglionic eminence-derived cells (i.e. the interneurons that integrate into the cortical circuitry).

With best wishes,

Ben Novitch and Ranmal Samarasinghe

Have your say Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Also in the cell biology category:

TLR2 Regulates Hair Follicle Cycle and Regeneration via BMP Signaling

Luyang Xiong, Irina Zhevlakova, Xiaoxia Z. West, et al.

Selected by Marina Schernthanner

Mechano-dependent sorbitol accumulation supports biomolecular condensate

Stephanie Torrino, William M Oldham, Andrés R Tejedor, et al.

Selected by Teodora Piskova

CRISPR-dependent base editing screens identify separation of function mutants of RADX with altered RAD51 regulatory activity

Madison B. Adolph, Atharv S. Garje, Swati Balakrishnan, et al.

Selected by Jessica Chevallier, Pierre Caron

Also in the developmental biology category:

The genome of the colonial hydroid Hydractinia reveals their stem cells utilize a toolkit of evolutionarily shared genes with all animals

Christine E. Schnitzler, E. Sally Chang, Justin Waletich, et al.

Selected by Isabella Cisneros

VEGFA mRNA-LNP promotes biliary epithelial cell-to-hepatocyte conversion in acute and chronic liver diseases and reverses steatosis and fibrosis

Fatima Rizvi, Yu-Ri Lee, Ricardo Diaz-Aragon, et al.

Selected by Organogenesis and Cancer Program

Glial Draper signaling triggers cross-neuron plasticity in bystander neurons after neuronal cell death

Yupu Wang, Ruiling Zhang, Sihao Huang, et al.

Selected by Matthew Davies

Also in the neuroscience category:

CRISPR screens in iPSC-derived neurons reveal principles of tau proteostasis

Avi J. Samelson, Nabeela Ariqat, Justin McKetney, et al.

Selected by Kritika Mehta

Generating human neural diversity with a multiplexed morphogen screen in organoids

Neal D. Amin, Kevin W. Kelley, Jin Hao, et al.

Selected by Monica Tambalo

The unique synaptic circuitry of specialized olfactory glomeruli in Drosophila melanogaster

Lydia Gruber, Rafael Cantera, Markus William Pleijzier, et al.

Selected by T. W. Schwanitz

Also in the physiology category:

Hypoxia blunts angiogenic signaling and upregulates the antioxidant system in elephant seal endothelial cells

Kaitlin N Allen, Julia María Torres-Velarde, Juan Manuel Vazquez, et al.

Selected by Sarah Young-Veenstra

H₂O₂ sulfenylates CHE linking local infection to establishment of systemic acquired resistance

Lijun Cao, Heejin Yoo, Tianyuan Chen, et al.

Selected by Marc Somssich

Mitochondrial citrate carrier SLC25A1 is a dosage-dependent regulator of metabolic reprogramming and morphogenesis in the developing heart

Chiemela Ohanele, Jessica N. Peoples, Anja Karlstaedt, et al.

Selected by Chee Kiang Ewe, Preethi Krishnaraj

preLists in the cell biology category:

The Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting

This preList is made up of the preprints discussed during the Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting that took place in Chicago in July 2023.

Identification of neural oscillations and epileptiform changes in human brain organoids

Share this:

Have your say Cancel reply

Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

Also in the cell biology category:

TLR2 Regulates Hair Follicle Cycle and Regeneration via BMP Signaling

Mechano-dependent sorbitol accumulation supports biomolecular condensate

CRISPR-dependent base editing screens identify separation of function mutants of RADX with altered RAD51 regulatory activity

Also in the developmental biology category:

The genome of the colonial hydroid Hydractinia reveals their stem cells utilize a toolkit of evolutionarily shared genes with all animals

VEGFA mRNA-LNP promotes biliary epithelial cell-to-hepatocyte conversion in acute and chronic liver diseases and reverses steatosis and fibrosis

Glial Draper signaling triggers cross-neuron plasticity in bystander neurons after neuronal cell death

Also in the neuroscience category:

CRISPR screens in iPSC-derived neurons reveal principles of tau proteostasis

Generating human neural diversity with a multiplexed morphogen screen in organoids

The unique synaptic circuitry of specialized olfactory glomeruli in Drosophila melanogaster

Also in the physiology category:

Hypoxia blunts angiogenic signaling and upregulates the antioxidant system in elephant seal endothelial cells

H2O2 sulfenylates CHE linking local infection to establishment of systemic acquired resistance

Mitochondrial citrate carrier SLC25A1 is a dosage-dependent regulator of metabolic reprogramming and morphogenesis in the developing heart

preLists in the cell biology category:

The Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination

Alumni picks – preLights 5th Birthday

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

Fibroblasts

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

FENS 2020

Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

BioMalPar XVI: Biology and Pathology of the Malaria Parasite

Cell Polarity

TAGC 2020

3D Gastruloids

ECFG15 – Fungal biology

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

Autophagy

Lung Disease and Regeneration

Cellular metabolism

BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

MitoList

Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019

ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018

Also in the developmental biology category:

The Society for Developmental Biology 82nd Annual Meeting

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

9th International Symposium on the Biology of Vertebrate Sex Determination

Alumni picks – preLights 5th Birthday

CellBio 2022 – An ASCB/EMBO Meeting

2nd Conference of the Visegrád Group Society for Developmental Biology

Fibroblasts

EMBL Synthetic Morphogenesis: From Gene Circuits to Tissue Architecture (2021)

EMBL Conference: From functional genomics to systems biology

Single Cell Biology 2020

Society for Developmental Biology 79th Annual Meeting

FENS 2020

Planar Cell Polarity – PCP

Cell Polarity

TAGC 2020

3D Gastruloids

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

EDBC Alicante 2019

EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

SDB 78th Annual Meeting 2019

Lung Disease and Regeneration

Young Embryologist Network Conference 2019

Pattern formation during development

BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

Zebrafish immunology

Also in the neuroscience category:

CSHL 87th Symposium: Stem Cells

Journal of Cell Science meeting ‘Imaging Cell Dynamics’

FENS 2020

ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

SDB 78th Annual Meeting 2019

Autophagy

Young Embryologist Network Conference 2019

H₂O₂ sulfenylates CHE linking local infection to establishment of systemic acquired resistance