Menu

Close

SABER enables highly multiplexed and amplified detection of DNA and RNA in cells and tissues

Jocelyn Y. Kishi, Brian J. Beliveau, Sylvain W. Lapan, Emma R. West, Allen Zhu, Hiroshi M. Sasaki, Sinem K. Saka, Yu Wang, Constance L. Cepko, Peng Yin

Preprint posted on August 27, 2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/27/401810

Article now published in Nature Methods at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0404-0

Utilizing strand displacing polymerases, Kishi et al. forged SABER to enable a faster, more sensitive, and cheaper protocol of fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Selected by Yen-Chung Chen

Background and context

To understand where and how much a gene is expressed or where a genetic element locates on chromosomes, in situ hybridization is often the technique of choice. In situ hybridization involves detecting nucleic acid sequences with complementary probes labeled with isotopes, fluorophores, or enzymes [Reviewed in 1]. Though in situ hybridization is powerful and enables characterization and quantification of gene expression in tissues with single cell resolution, several challenges remain.

It is challenging to examine more than a couple of genes simultaneously due to the limitation of available fluorescent channels or chromogens, and signal intensity is an issue for in situ hybridization, where low intensity leads to indistinguishable signal in complicated tissues or an environment with auto-fluorescence.

To overcome these challenges, several modifications have been developed. A number of simultaneously detected targets can be increased using a combination of fluorophores on each of the probes [2, 3] or by labeling removal and re-labeling. Signal intensity can be amplified using a probe with “branched” binding site for tagging [4] or in situ amplification of detectable concatemers [5]. While these methods greatly broadened the application of in situ hybridization, the cost and complicated workflow can often limit the availability of these methods.

Key findings

Kishi et al. aimed to improve fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) by establishing a simple but robust protocol to synthesize probes tagged by repeated sequences (or concatemers) in a programmable fashion, so that multiple fluorophore-labeled “imager” oligonucleotides complementary to the concatemer can specifically bind to and light up the probe.

Utilizing primer exchange reaction, which they previously developed [6], the authors demonstrated that concatemers can be synthesized efficiently with defined lengths, and different concatemer sequences can be synthesized on the same probes by using different combination of catalytic DNA hairpin with primer exchange reaction. This programmability of concatemer length enables precise control of the degree and variability of signal amplification in FISH (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. SABER-FISH: Amplifying FISH signal intensity with probes with programmable concatemer (Adapted from preprint figure 1C, available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.)

 

The probes synthesized with this new technique, signal amplification by exchange reaction (SABER), were then tested on an MRC-5 cell model and retinal tissues. On MRC-5 cells, unbranched SABER provided 35 times stronger signal when detecting telomere DNA, compared to unextended FISH probes. When detecting Cbx5 mRNA, branched SABER provided even more powerful signal amplification: 464 times stronger than unextended FISH probes. On mouse retinal tissues, SABER was able to detect cell type markers specifically even with low expression level, and the signal intensity of each marker closely corresponded to relative abundance observed in single-cell RNA-seq.

In terms of the ability to multiplex, the authors showed that SABER is compatible with multiple rounds of labeling removal and relabeling and immunocytochemistry by simultaneously staining 7 transcripts with SABER along with two proteins with antibody. Furthermore, SABER is also compatible with using a combination of 3 fluorophores to perform 6-color labeling at the same time (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Multiplexing detection targets in SABER-FISH: Using multiple fluorescent images, re-labeling, and immunohistochemistry. (Adapted from preprint figure 5A, available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.)

 

Finally, the authors examined potential enhancers for Grik1, a receptor enriched in OFF bipolar cells. Six enhancers were cloned into reporter constructs, driving expression of specific sequences detected with SABER. Two cell type-specific enhancers were identified, one driving expressing in Grik1-positive bipolar cells, and another driving expression in rod cells. Taking advantage of being able to detect DNA and RNA simultaneously, the authors also used SABER to quantify reporter transcripts and reporter plasmids at the same time to assess enhancer activity when accounting for plasmid number variation in each cell.

Why I like this preprint

The ease of manipulating nucleic acids makes in situ hybridization (ISH) time-efficient and powerful. Time from designing a new probe to experiment takes days instead of months. Nonetheless, the improvements to signal intensity and the ability to detect multiple targets require modifications that are not accessible to many labs, and thus the cost in time and resources to apply these improved ISH become similar to antibody-based detection methods.

In this preprint, Kishi et al. elegantly showed how strand displacing polymerase can be harnessed to simplify probe synthesis for signal-amplified FISH in a programmable and modular fashion. This technique allows precise control of concatemer length and a more defined degree of signal amplification. It is also compatible with fluorescence multiplexing and re-labeling, which enables potential high-throughput FISH on the same piece of tissue and the collection of expression profile with spatial resolution. FABER can potentially speed up and scale up research and clinical investigations relying on FISH and make the enhanced approach more accessible by lowering the cost of application.

Open question

  1. Several methods were developed to amplify FISH signal, and some of them used similar approach to enhance signal intensity per probe. I was wondering how well the signal intensity and specificity of SABER looks when compared to those.
  2. The authors showed that iterative branching concatemers enhance signal intensity by orders of magnitude in figure 2. This is a favorable feature when detecting lowly expressed transcripts, and since the probes used in figure 3 on are non-branching ones. I became curious about:
    1. Whether the signal from probes with iterative branching concatemers still closely reflects transcript abundance
    2. If probes with branching concatemers allow simultaneous detection of multiple probes

Reference

  1. Farrell, R. E. in RNA Methodologies 261–282 (Elsevier, 2010). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-374727-3.00012-7
  2. Speicher, M. R., Ballard, S. G. & Ward, D. C. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat. Genet. 12, 368 (1996).
  3. Schröck, E. et al. Multicolor Spectral Karyotyping of Human Chromosomes. Science (80-. ). 273, 494 LP-497 (1996).
  4. Player, A. N., Shen, L. P., Kenny, D., Antao, V. P. & Kolberg, J. A. Single-copy gene detection using branched DNA (bDNA) in situ hybridization. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 603–612 (2001).
  5. Dirks, R. M. & Pierce, N. A. Triggered amplification by hybridization chain reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 15275 LP-15278 (2004).
  6. Kishi, J. Y., Schaus, T. E., Gopalkrishnan, N., Xuan, F. & Yin, P. Programmable autonomous synthesis of single-stranded DNA. Nat. Chem. 10, 155 (2017).

Tags: fish

Posted on: 19th September 2018 , updated on: 20th September 2018

doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/prelights.4809

Read preprint (No Ratings Yet)




  • Have your say

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Sign up to customise the site to your preferences and to receive alerts

    Register here

    Also in the cell biology category:

    3D Gastruloids

    A curated list of preprints related to Gastruloids (in vitro models of early development obtained by 3D aggregation of embryonic cells)

     



    List by Paul Gerald L. Sanchez and Stefano Vianello

    ECFG15 – Fungal biology

    Preprints presented at 15th European Conference on Fungal Genetics 17-20 February 2020 Rome

     



    List by Hiral Shah

    ASCB EMBO Annual Meeting 2019

    A collection of preprints presented at the 2019 ASCB EMBO Meeting in Washington, DC (December 7-11)

     



    List by Madhuja Samaddar, Ramona Jühlen, Amanda Haage, Laura McCormick, Maiko Kitaoka

    EMBL Seeing is Believing – Imaging the Molecular Processes of Life

    Preprints discussed at the 2019 edition of Seeing is Believing, at EMBL Heidelberg from the 9th-12th October 2019

     



    List by Gautam Dey

    Autophagy

    Preprints on autophagy and lysosomal degradation and its role in neurodegeneration and disease. Includes molecular mechanisms, upstream signalling and regulation as well as studies on pharmaceutical interventions to upregulate the process.

     



    List by Sandra Malmgren Hill

    Lung Disease and Regeneration

    This preprint list compiles highlights from the field of lung biology.

     



    List by Rob Hynds

    Cellular metabolism

    A curated list of preprints related to cellular metabolism at Biorxiv by Pablo Ranea Robles from the Prelights community. Special interest on lipid metabolism, peroxisomes and mitochondria.

     



    List by Pablo Ranea Robles

    BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

    Preprints presented at the BSCB/BSDB Annual Meeting 2019

     



    List by Gautam Dey

    MitoList

    This list of preprints is focused on work expanding our knowledge on mitochondria in any organism, tissue or cell type, from the normal biology to the pathology.

     



    List by Sandra Franco Iborra

    Biophysical Society Annual Meeting 2019

    Few of the preprints that were discussed in the recent BPS annual meeting at Baltimore, USA

     



    List by Joseph Jose Thottacherry

    ASCB/EMBO Annual Meeting 2018

    This list relates to preprints that were discussed at the recent ASCB conference.

     



    List by Gautam Dey, Amanda Haage
    Close